Trap line, Skins are the better team an playing well. This I wear they turn it on and make a run a the division. Robert torched the Vikes last year. Road favorite covers in TNF.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Trap line, Skins are the better team an playing well. This I wear they turn it on and make a run a the division. Robert torched the Vikes last year. Road favorite covers in TNF.
Offense playing well, def playing better. Incompetent play calling on final SD possession but incompetent play calling by Shanahan not trying to run out more clock series before. As for 2nd half of Denver game, coaching again. Ivan only hope the Shanahans are learning from their mistakes. This game shouldn't be close enough to factor late game stupidity in
0
Offense playing well, def playing better. Incompetent play calling on final SD possession but incompetent play calling by Shanahan not trying to run out more clock series before. As for 2nd half of Denver game, coaching again. Ivan only hope the Shanahans are learning from their mistakes. This game shouldn't be close enough to factor late game stupidity in
I have read people talking about how the Redskins D is playing better. That is true, but that doesn't mean they are playing well. Better means they are no longer historically bad. They gave up over 400 yards to the Chargers, 41 points to the Bears (Josh McCown played the majority of the game) and 45 to the Broncos in the last three games. They are 31st in points allowed (Vikings are 30th).
Their special team are atrocious. I fully expect Patterson to do big things against the Redskins. Griffin still isn't the player he was last year, and his accuracy (for some reason) is noticeably worse. Garcon really padded his yardage (about 50 extra yards) last game with two amazing catches.
As to the guy above talking about coaching, to an extent, I agree. They have gotten away from the run when it the best thing any unit on the team does. But to act like coaching caused them to lose the 4th quarter 31 - 0 is silly. They were thoroughly dominated all around and coaching only exacerbated the difference in talent.
0
I have read people talking about how the Redskins D is playing better. That is true, but that doesn't mean they are playing well. Better means they are no longer historically bad. They gave up over 400 yards to the Chargers, 41 points to the Bears (Josh McCown played the majority of the game) and 45 to the Broncos in the last three games. They are 31st in points allowed (Vikings are 30th).
Their special team are atrocious. I fully expect Patterson to do big things against the Redskins. Griffin still isn't the player he was last year, and his accuracy (for some reason) is noticeably worse. Garcon really padded his yardage (about 50 extra yards) last game with two amazing catches.
As to the guy above talking about coaching, to an extent, I agree. They have gotten away from the run when it the best thing any unit on the team does. But to act like coaching caused them to lose the 4th quarter 31 - 0 is silly. They were thoroughly dominated all around and coaching only exacerbated the difference in talent.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
