May not be up early enough so posting early.
Like the way the Vikings have looked and based on how the Jets have looked this line tells me everything- IMO
Jets +3 buy (5 units)
over 40.5 (2 units)
GL
May not be up early enough so posting early.
Like the way the Vikings have looked and based on how the Jets have looked this line tells me everything- IMO
Jets +3 buy (5 units)
over 40.5 (2 units)
GL
May not be up early enough so posting early.
Like the way the Vikings have looked and based on how the Jets have looked this line tells me everything- IMO
Jets +3 buy (5 units)
over 40.5 (2 units)
GL
Yes, because that's how a Contrarian thinks. Minnesota has been dominant; the Jets just lost to the Broncos.
It seems at -140 that the books are begging people to take the Vikings.
Yes, because that's how a Contrarian thinks. Minnesota has been dominant; the Jets just lost to the Broncos.
It seems at -140 that the books are begging people to take the Vikings.
Yes based on what I’ve seen in 4 weeks this line is ridiculous. I could be wrong but Jets win in London and Rodgers continues his dominance over the Vikings.
Either way BOL to you
Yes based on what I’ve seen in 4 weeks this line is ridiculous. I could be wrong but Jets win in London and Rodgers continues his dominance over the Vikings.
Either way BOL to you
Good luck OWO!
Good luck OWO!
absolutely. The line on this game should be more like Minnesota -6 based on what we’ve seen so far. I think this will be the type of season where the jets look great every other week. Jets for me as well.
absolutely. The line on this game should be more like Minnesota -6 based on what we’ve seen so far. I think this will be the type of season where the jets look great every other week. Jets for me as well.
First of all... I'm a Vikings fan since my youth in the 70s. I never bet a side on them.
Mean regression could be the story for both teams. The poison Nick Sabin talks about is real. Jets were a lot of SB picks whereas Vikings were last in division.
I wouldn't trust the Vikings but I sure want too. This game in London doesn't bode well for Vikings either.
First of all... I'm a Vikings fan since my youth in the 70s. I never bet a side on them.
Mean regression could be the story for both teams. The poison Nick Sabin talks about is real. Jets were a lot of SB picks whereas Vikings were last in division.
I wouldn't trust the Vikings but I sure want too. This game in London doesn't bode well for Vikings either.
@Rowdie22
Wtf, fanatic since the 70s yet you don't have trust and faith in the Vikings on a phenomenal season and miracle performance by Donald so far
@Rowdie22
Wtf, fanatic since the 70s yet you don't have trust and faith in the Vikings on a phenomenal season and miracle performance by Donald so far
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.