There is a thread originally posted by Dawniewags (now banned) regarding a system that helps revealing frauds in the playoffs. The thread was posted on 11/06/2010. The system uses total yards - total defense yards, then divided by the 16 games. Anyone with an average of at least +35 yards generally does well in the playoffs. It also mentions the t/o ration being important also. Anyways here are the numbers...they kind of coincide with playoff seeds.
AFC Denver +107.125 / -1 TO New England +54.625 / +25 TO Houston +48.812 / +12 TO Cincy +13 / +4 TO Baltimore +1.562 / +9 TO Colts -11.812 / -12 TO
NFC San Fran +67.437 / +9 TO Seabirds +44.437 / +13 TO ATL +26.062 / +13 TO GB +22.687 / +7 TO Wash +5.5 / +17 TO Minn -13.437 / -1 TO
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
There is a thread originally posted by Dawniewags (now banned) regarding a system that helps revealing frauds in the playoffs. The thread was posted on 11/06/2010. The system uses total yards - total defense yards, then divided by the 16 games. Anyone with an average of at least +35 yards generally does well in the playoffs. It also mentions the t/o ration being important also. Anyways here are the numbers...they kind of coincide with playoff seeds.
AFC Denver +107.125 / -1 TO New England +54.625 / +25 TO Houston +48.812 / +12 TO Cincy +13 / +4 TO Baltimore +1.562 / +9 TO Colts -11.812 / -12 TO
NFC San Fran +67.437 / +9 TO Seabirds +44.437 / +13 TO ATL +26.062 / +13 TO GB +22.687 / +7 TO Wash +5.5 / +17 TO Minn -13.437 / -1 TO
I would like to see how many of Denver's TO's came in the first few weeks with the team figuring out the Payton O.
Also someone posted a site for NFL stats a while ago...any idea what it is? I want scoring D rankings and to breakdown common opponents and strength of schedule...
0
I would like to see how many of Denver's TO's came in the first few weeks with the team figuring out the Payton O.
Also someone posted a site for NFL stats a while ago...any idea what it is? I want scoring D rankings and to breakdown common opponents and strength of schedule...
YES that's the system all though last years neither team qualified but once again defense wins championships prevailed
teams that meet the requirements you can eliminate every team with a rookie QB so remove Seattle , 49ers, colts redskins ,
remove teams who lost to tampa bay in season none ever won a superbowl except saints who decided to go bench final 3 games of year
Vikings lost to Tampa at home on thursday night
Falcons got hammered at Home by tamapa and they played starters all 4 quarters
they both will be exiting playoffs again
also sos comes intoplay the teams that got in on a losers schedule will go bye bye
two of them are Denver and atalanta
also NO superbowl loser ever got back to bowl in following year (only the bills pulled it off)
the bowl losers who went kaboom next year are from earliest i can remember ,Rams Panthers, Eagles, Cardinals , Patriots Seahawks
so say bye bye to Patriots whom again their defense is ranked at bottom of league ranked 28th overall
SO we have your best possible Matchup being the one nobody sees in every forum i have looked no one not even ESPN or NFL network sees it being Texans vs Packers
all though texans lost 3 games out of 4 the last one again colts used coach being back on sidelines for motivation got them that win i think this time now with all that bullshit out of the way texans will play thier game as they have done most of year
win home game in a breeze
remember bengals played vs 2nd string of Ravens and it wasn't easy for them that rookie QB for Balty was driving bengals nuts
this is rematch of last years two teams with rookie QB's Texans vs Bengals
texans won huge then went on road and hung in as a 7.5 dog at Ravens but lost the game
So Texans have a fairly easy road into bowl 1 home game then two roads @ Patriots then @ Broncos and yes Manning was great but when your divison consist of Chargers, Raiders Chiefs LOL you get the picture
Patriots same thing gifted 6 wins and dont use that game vs Texans no team would win or even come close on that mid season 3 trip rodeo in 17 days.
0
YES that's the system all though last years neither team qualified but once again defense wins championships prevailed
teams that meet the requirements you can eliminate every team with a rookie QB so remove Seattle , 49ers, colts redskins ,
remove teams who lost to tampa bay in season none ever won a superbowl except saints who decided to go bench final 3 games of year
Vikings lost to Tampa at home on thursday night
Falcons got hammered at Home by tamapa and they played starters all 4 quarters
they both will be exiting playoffs again
also sos comes intoplay the teams that got in on a losers schedule will go bye bye
two of them are Denver and atalanta
also NO superbowl loser ever got back to bowl in following year (only the bills pulled it off)
the bowl losers who went kaboom next year are from earliest i can remember ,Rams Panthers, Eagles, Cardinals , Patriots Seahawks
so say bye bye to Patriots whom again their defense is ranked at bottom of league ranked 28th overall
SO we have your best possible Matchup being the one nobody sees in every forum i have looked no one not even ESPN or NFL network sees it being Texans vs Packers
all though texans lost 3 games out of 4 the last one again colts used coach being back on sidelines for motivation got them that win i think this time now with all that bullshit out of the way texans will play thier game as they have done most of year
win home game in a breeze
remember bengals played vs 2nd string of Ravens and it wasn't easy for them that rookie QB for Balty was driving bengals nuts
this is rematch of last years two teams with rookie QB's Texans vs Bengals
texans won huge then went on road and hung in as a 7.5 dog at Ravens but lost the game
So Texans have a fairly easy road into bowl 1 home game then two roads @ Patriots then @ Broncos and yes Manning was great but when your divison consist of Chargers, Raiders Chiefs LOL you get the picture
Patriots same thing gifted 6 wins and dont use that game vs Texans no team would win or even come close on that mid season 3 trip rodeo in 17 days.
So Texans have a fairly easy road into bowl 1 home game then two roads @ Patriots then @ Broncos
I know this is well after the fact but an easy road to the superbowl would include back to back games of being close to 10 point dogs? Do you kill your bookies to avoid paying your debts to them? Do you pick out your own clothes to wear or does someone have to do that for you? If that is an easy road into bowl how easy is the pats 1 home game then @ broncos? Or how about the Broncos 2 home games? Does every team have an easy road into the superbowl? They should all make it right? Wouldn't that be fair? I bet you got loads of trophies growing up. Maybe you even got your own nice, short bus. BTW lets eliminate the 49ers 'rookie' qb..................... Patriots gifted 6 wins.. Pats had a tougher schedule than the Texans by any metric you want to use. So much fking garbage in that one post. Pretty much everything you said there is wrong and I'm not talking about your predictions. [/useless directionless rant]
0
Quote Originally Posted by tonyroman:
So Texans have a fairly easy road into bowl 1 home game then two roads @ Patriots then @ Broncos
I know this is well after the fact but an easy road to the superbowl would include back to back games of being close to 10 point dogs? Do you kill your bookies to avoid paying your debts to them? Do you pick out your own clothes to wear or does someone have to do that for you? If that is an easy road into bowl how easy is the pats 1 home game then @ broncos? Or how about the Broncos 2 home games? Does every team have an easy road into the superbowl? They should all make it right? Wouldn't that be fair? I bet you got loads of trophies growing up. Maybe you even got your own nice, short bus. BTW lets eliminate the 49ers 'rookie' qb..................... Patriots gifted 6 wins.. Pats had a tougher schedule than the Texans by any metric you want to use. So much fking garbage in that one post. Pretty much everything you said there is wrong and I'm not talking about your predictions. [/useless directionless rant]
I would like to see how many of Denver's TO's came in the first few weeks with the team figuring out the Payton O.
Also someone posted a site for NFL stats a while ago...any idea what it is? I want scoring D rankings and to breakdown common opponents and strength of schedule...
This should keep you busy...don't forget to reset the little calendar box, if looking at other dates than up to today, every time you select a different stat.
I would like to see how many of Denver's TO's came in the first few weeks with the team figuring out the Payton O.
Also someone posted a site for NFL stats a while ago...any idea what it is? I want scoring D rankings and to breakdown common opponents and strength of schedule...
This should keep you busy...don't forget to reset the little calendar box, if looking at other dates than up to today, every time you select a different stat.
There is a thread originally posted by Dawniewags (now banned) regarding a system that helps revealing frauds in the playoffs. The thread was posted on 11/06/2010. The system uses total yards - total defense yards, then divided by the 16 games. Anyone with an average of at least +35 yards generally does well in the playoffs. It also mentions the t/o ration being important also. Anyways here are the numbers...they kind of coincide with playoff seeds.
AFC Denver +107.125 / -1 TO New England +54.625 / +25 TO Houston +48.812 / +12 TO Cincy +13 / +4 TO Baltimore +1.562 / +9 TO Colts -11.812 / -12 TO
NFC San Fran +67.437 / +9 TO Seabirds +44.437 / +13 TO ATL +26.062 / +13 TO GB +22.687 / +7 TO Wash +5.5 / +17 TO Minn -13.437 / -1 TO
Playoff Numbers
Baltimore +3.233 / +5 TO
San Fran +30.75 / +2 TO
I really would not read to much into the system above as it has been proven to not be that accurate in the past. I have ran several numbers and definately have some questions.
The sample size is small....I guess you would have to ask yourself who played the stronger teams in the playoffs?
Either way Baltimore is on fire right now, but have they really played any competition? NE and Indy's D is proven to be bad. Everyone also said Denver, NE and Indy played a very weak schedule....
Did Atlanta and Green Bay play a weak schedule? We all know that SF played a much tougher schedule during the season, but I tend to lean on the idea of the playoffs are a new season.
I am definately concerned with the kicking game of SF and moderately concerned about the young QB, Kap. Even though Kap has had several games to implode this year, but he has proven himself everytime.... NO, NE, GB, ATL.....he could have easily buckled in everyone of these games. NO away, NE away, GB pick 6, and ATL down big......each time he did not falter. Another concern is SF vs great defenses, they struggled with Seattle and St. Louis.
I am leaning SF, I just think overall they are a better football TEAM with a very good defense. Just a few thoughts.....
0
Quote Originally Posted by VegasSB:
There is a thread originally posted by Dawniewags (now banned) regarding a system that helps revealing frauds in the playoffs. The thread was posted on 11/06/2010. The system uses total yards - total defense yards, then divided by the 16 games. Anyone with an average of at least +35 yards generally does well in the playoffs. It also mentions the t/o ration being important also. Anyways here are the numbers...they kind of coincide with playoff seeds.
AFC Denver +107.125 / -1 TO New England +54.625 / +25 TO Houston +48.812 / +12 TO Cincy +13 / +4 TO Baltimore +1.562 / +9 TO Colts -11.812 / -12 TO
NFC San Fran +67.437 / +9 TO Seabirds +44.437 / +13 TO ATL +26.062 / +13 TO GB +22.687 / +7 TO Wash +5.5 / +17 TO Minn -13.437 / -1 TO
Playoff Numbers
Baltimore +3.233 / +5 TO
San Fran +30.75 / +2 TO
I really would not read to much into the system above as it has been proven to not be that accurate in the past. I have ran several numbers and definately have some questions.
The sample size is small....I guess you would have to ask yourself who played the stronger teams in the playoffs?
Either way Baltimore is on fire right now, but have they really played any competition? NE and Indy's D is proven to be bad. Everyone also said Denver, NE and Indy played a very weak schedule....
Did Atlanta and Green Bay play a weak schedule? We all know that SF played a much tougher schedule during the season, but I tend to lean on the idea of the playoffs are a new season.
I am definately concerned with the kicking game of SF and moderately concerned about the young QB, Kap. Even though Kap has had several games to implode this year, but he has proven himself everytime.... NO, NE, GB, ATL.....he could have easily buckled in everyone of these games. NO away, NE away, GB pick 6, and ATL down big......each time he did not falter. Another concern is SF vs great defenses, they struggled with Seattle and St. Louis.
I am leaning SF, I just think overall they are a better football TEAM with a very good defense. Just a few thoughts.....
Either way Baltimore is on fire right now, but have they really played any competition? NE and Indy's D is proven to be bad. Everyone also said Denver, NE and Indy played a very weak schedule....
Did Atlanta and Green Bay play a weak schedule? We all know that SF played a much tougher schedule during the season, but I tend to lean on the idea of the playoffs are a new season.
NE and Denver were two of the favs to win the SB.. Before they lost AT HOME.
Pretty impressive IMO
and FYI
Balt had 6 regular season meetings with eventual playoff teams.
Packers: 6 games vs po team
Denver, NE and SF: 5 games vs playoff team
Atlanta: Just two games vs playoff bound team..
SF reg season schedule looked middle of the pack to me.
0
Quote Originally Posted by VegasSB:
Either way Baltimore is on fire right now, but have they really played any competition? NE and Indy's D is proven to be bad. Everyone also said Denver, NE and Indy played a very weak schedule....
Did Atlanta and Green Bay play a weak schedule? We all know that SF played a much tougher schedule during the season, but I tend to lean on the idea of the playoffs are a new season.
NE and Denver were two of the favs to win the SB.. Before they lost AT HOME.
Pretty impressive IMO
and FYI
Balt had 6 regular season meetings with eventual playoff teams.
Packers: 6 games vs po team
Denver, NE and SF: 5 games vs playoff team
Atlanta: Just two games vs playoff bound team..
SF reg season schedule looked middle of the pack to me.
I really would not read to much into the system above as it has been proven to not be that accurate in the past. I have ran several numbers and definately have some questions.
The sample size is small....I guess you would have to ask yourself who played the stronger teams in the playoffs?
Either way Baltimore is on fire right now, but have they really played any competition? NE and Indy's D is proven to be bad. Everyone also said Denver, NE and Indy played a very weak schedule....
Did Atlanta and Green Bay play a weak schedule? We all know that SF played a much tougher schedule during the season, but I tend to lean on the idea of the playoffs are a new season.
I am definately concerned with the kicking game of SF and moderately concerned about the young QB, Kap. Even though Kap has had several games to implode this year, but he has proven himself everytime.... NO, NE, GB, ATL.....he could have easily buckled in everyone of these games. NO away, NE away, GB pick 6, and ATL down big......each time he did not falter. Another concern is SF vs great defenses, they struggled with Seattle and St. Louis.
I am leaning SF, I just think overall they are a better football TEAM with a very good defense. Just a few thoughts.....
niners gl
0
Quote Originally Posted by VegasSB:
Playoff Numbers
Baltimore +3.233 / +5 TO
San Fran +30.75 / +2 TO
I really would not read to much into the system above as it has been proven to not be that accurate in the past. I have ran several numbers and definately have some questions.
The sample size is small....I guess you would have to ask yourself who played the stronger teams in the playoffs?
Either way Baltimore is on fire right now, but have they really played any competition? NE and Indy's D is proven to be bad. Everyone also said Denver, NE and Indy played a very weak schedule....
Did Atlanta and Green Bay play a weak schedule? We all know that SF played a much tougher schedule during the season, but I tend to lean on the idea of the playoffs are a new season.
I am definately concerned with the kicking game of SF and moderately concerned about the young QB, Kap. Even though Kap has had several games to implode this year, but he has proven himself everytime.... NO, NE, GB, ATL.....he could have easily buckled in everyone of these games. NO away, NE away, GB pick 6, and ATL down big......each time he did not falter. Another concern is SF vs great defenses, they struggled with Seattle and St. Louis.
I am leaning SF, I just think overall they are a better football TEAM with a very good defense. Just a few thoughts.....
You could also add that only a small handful of teams won the SB that were negative in TO's in the regular season, which would eliminate Denver.
I have the exact number and will try and look it up when I have time.
Denver I'm pretty sure was losing the TO battle all year just not at the start of the season as I track that stat in every game for every team. If I remember correctly the problem for Denver was their defense failing to get many takeaways.
The other thing to add is that teams with +20 or more TO'S rarely get to SB's. You could eliminate the Pats with this.
I have the exact numbers for this also but will have to go find it.
Teams +20 TO or more are generally getting alot of TO luck and are not as good as they may appear.............................................
0
You could also add that only a small handful of teams won the SB that were negative in TO's in the regular season, which would eliminate Denver.
I have the exact number and will try and look it up when I have time.
Denver I'm pretty sure was losing the TO battle all year just not at the start of the season as I track that stat in every game for every team. If I remember correctly the problem for Denver was their defense failing to get many takeaways.
The other thing to add is that teams with +20 or more TO'S rarely get to SB's. You could eliminate the Pats with this.
I have the exact numbers for this also but will have to go find it.
Teams +20 TO or more are generally getting alot of TO luck and are not as good as they may appear.............................................
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.