Feel bad for the Lions though their future looks bright, you never know when you'll have the all the pieces together at the right time. Obviously for betting purposes having them go for it on fourth and goal when I had them at +6.5 was pretty great. I thought they were better than the 49ers.....for whatever reason they didn't run it outside the tackles much at all in the second half. If they could do better than Goff as a quarterback they should...though for obvious reasons a coach and a general manager's future is tied to who quarterbacks your team....in this case the Lions' organization will almost certainly play it safe and do the status quo......I would trade up to get the LSU quarterback and give up whatever it takes to get him, but then your dick is on the line if you're the GM.....I'd put it on the line, because the Lions can be a top four team with Goff, but they won't win it with him.
I use killersports or gimmethedog, online databases....the playoff history goes back to 2002 and their regular season data goes back to 1989. The query text is usually listed below the explanation of the angle in highlighted text.
A) Play on the superbowl team with the lesser winning percentage.......16-2 ATS (+6.67), 12-6 straight up (+3.72), 6-12 o/u (-3.31)....average line/total +2.9/49, average score.....24.7-21.0......ON Chiefs
playoffs=1 and tA(W)
B) Play on the superbowl team with the lesser record the previous season.....14-8 ATS....ON 49ers
playoffs=1 and tS(W, N=8)
C) When those two angles above are combined, the team with the lesser record this year, and the higher winning percentage last season, those teams have gone 6-1 ATS (+2.86).......6-1 straight up (+5.29)......2-5 o/u.....(-4.86).....average line/total......-24.1/48.1.....average score.....24.3-19
Feel bad for the Lions though their future looks bright, you never know when you'll have the all the pieces together at the right time. Obviously for betting purposes having them go for it on fourth and goal when I had them at +6.5 was pretty great. I thought they were better than the 49ers.....for whatever reason they didn't run it outside the tackles much at all in the second half. If they could do better than Goff as a quarterback they should...though for obvious reasons a coach and a general manager's future is tied to who quarterbacks your team....in this case the Lions' organization will almost certainly play it safe and do the status quo......I would trade up to get the LSU quarterback and give up whatever it takes to get him, but then your dick is on the line if you're the GM.....I'd put it on the line, because the Lions can be a top four team with Goff, but they won't win it with him.
I use killersports or gimmethedog, online databases....the playoff history goes back to 2002 and their regular season data goes back to 1989. The query text is usually listed below the explanation of the angle in highlighted text.
A) Play on the superbowl team with the lesser winning percentage.......16-2 ATS (+6.67), 12-6 straight up (+3.72), 6-12 o/u (-3.31)....average line/total +2.9/49, average score.....24.7-21.0......ON Chiefs
playoffs=1 and tA(W)
B) Play on the superbowl team with the lesser record the previous season.....14-8 ATS....ON 49ers
playoffs=1 and tS(W, N=8)
C) When those two angles above are combined, the team with the lesser record this year, and the higher winning percentage last season, those teams have gone 6-1 ATS (+2.86).......6-1 straight up (+5.29)......2-5 o/u.....(-4.86).....average line/total......-24.1/48.1.....average score.....24.3-19
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so. It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly. Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality. Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it. As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.