The Horrible 2 Plays

Question

I had the Vikes &#x2B;4, so this is not a comment from a bitter loser.  Favre should have run the ball.  It was wide open.  He could have gotten at least 8 yards.  I&#x27;m not even a Vikings fan, but they outplayed the Saints.  Seriously questionable calls by the Refs.  Adrian Peterson was horrible.  12 men on the field?  Childress is an idiot.  Let Longwell have a shot.  It was a bullshit game, even though I won.  Colts BIGTIME in the SuperBowl.

Kershaw · Answer

I had the Vikes &#x2B;4, so this is not a comment from a bitter loser.  Favre should have run the ball.  It was wide open.  He could have gotten at least 8 yards.  I&#x27;m not even a Vikings fan, but they outplayed the Saints.  Seriously questionable calls by the Refs.  Adrian Peterson was horrible.  12 men on the field?  Childress is an idiot.  Let Longwell have a shot.  It was a bullshit game, even though I won.  Colts BIGTIME in the SuperBowl.

DannoDanger · Answer

I agree with your main point, which I think is that the Vikes lost the game on their own. Favre wasn't running that ball though. No chance. He did have Berrian open on the sideline though. That was obviously the right move. The end of regulation was an abortion. I don't care about coin flips, bad pass interference calls, or anything else. The Vikings killed themselves time and time again. I had a Vikings to win the NFC future, and I didn't lose to a fix, like alot of idiots think. I lost because Minnesota choked away the end of regulation.

Funny that three of the most talented teams in the league (Min, Dal, SD) have extended coaches that are incapable of winning a Superbowl.

NOBAMA · Answer

favre has always made his money throwing the ball...why should it change on the last play.. he throws the ball, hes not a runner...

if his teammates didnt fumble the ball all day, the game would of been over then

LarzTallica · Answer

Funny that three of the most talented teams in the league (Min, Dal, SD) have extended coaches that are incapable of winning a Superbowl.

Really ? Dallas? SD ? they cant win playoff games. Romo sucks ass. As Aikman said what makes Romo a great QB? He hasnt done anything besides winning regular season games.

jmw59 · Answer

He&#x27;s too much of a panty-waist to run the ball.  Faking ass prick.  I hope his last game was a loss to&#xD;&#xA;the Who Dat nation.

GottaGetThat · Answer

Last time i checked, good ole Childress was not out there running the ball and losing the handoff and such!  Players lost that game, not bad coaching!  Minus the 12 men on the field deal!

TyDarius · Answer

Last I checked. Turnovers are part of the game, 12 men on the field is unacceptable, and shutting your offense down when you get to the 35 yard line is unacceptable. Play scared and you lose, ask Ryan. You play to win the game. They shoulda kept the pedal on the medal on that last drive. Two consective run plays to Peterson, who I would not trust carrying the rock on that day.

washaice · Answer

[Quote: Originally Posted by LarzTallica]  Funny that three of the most talented teams in the league (Min, Dal,&#xD;&#xA;SD) have extended coaches that are incapable of winning a Superbowl. Really ? Dallas? SD ? they cant win playoff games. Romo sucks ass. As Aikman said what makes Romo a great QB? He hasnt done anything besides winning regular season games.  [/Quote]Read the sentence dumb ass, it says INCAPABLE not capable...It&#x27;s tough to argue the same point that the person just posted before hand.

The Horrible 2 Plays

Hot Forum Topics