All Forums | NFL Betting Forum

Trend I have been noticing this post season before you pound Pats for S.B

...

Participants:

Posts: 25

Envy123

Prospect

Joined: Dec, 2014

Posts: 87

Posted: Jan. 19, 2015 - 12:49 AM ET #1

Every team that was "gifted" a victory by either a bs call or poor play has covered there next game this post season. Examples: Balt vs Pitts, with Bell being out the majority of people thought Balt only won because of Pitts Star RB didnt play and didn't have a chance against a team like N.E with everyone healthy, Balt covered. Detroit vs Dallas. People said there was no way Dallas would cover against G.B when they got gifted the win from the refs on that bs Penalty. Dallas covered +6. Balt N.E. people said that N.E would not cover there spread against Indy because they barely beat Baltimore, and Balt outplayed them the majority game, just blew out Indy and obviously covered. I already see it now, everyone will be on N.E because Seattle doesn't deserve to be there after there improbable win and they should have lost. N.E can't contain Lynch, Seattle can most certainly completely contain bluont. N.E will have a very one dimensional offence similar to what we saw against Balt. They were fortunate to come out of there with a victory but on a neutral field, I think Seattle's D is too much for N.E here. Agree or disagree, you know where the public will be on after watching N.E demolish Indy. But mg lean is currently on the Hawks and that damn heart they have.

Envy123

Prospect

Joined: Dec, 2014

Posts: 87

Posted: Jan. 19, 2015 - 12:57 AM ET #2

Forgot about Dallas vs G.B game where the catch was called back on Dez Bryant which would have most likely gave Dallas the win. Majority thought G.B should have lost that game. Today, out played hawks and covered. Can't make this up peeps

Rookieguru

Veteran

Joined: Dec, 2012

Posts: 1397

Posted: Jan. 19, 2015 - 1:06 AM ET #3

N.E can't contain Lynch, Seattle can most certainly completely contain bluont. N.E will have a very one dimensional offence similar to what we saw against Balt. They were fortunate to come out of there with a victory but on a neutral field, I think Seattle's D is too much for N.E here.

---

The sorry axx GB def contained the the entire hawks offense for 55 minutes...

hawks def is over rate...offense is on par.

Hawks need all kind tricks to win the NFC...BillyCheck will not be out trick. Monkeys will not trick human twice.

NE Large.

---

mafia13

Veteran

Joined: Sep, 2013

Posts: 1415

Posted: Jan. 19, 2015 - 1:16 AM ET #4

hawks

theclaw

All-Star

Joined: May, 2008

Posts: 12118

Posted: Jan. 19, 2015 - 2:20 AM ET #5

Quote Originally Posted by Rookieguru:

N.E can't contain Lynch, Seattle can most certainly completely contain bluont. N.E will have a very one dimensional offence similar to what we saw against Balt. They were fortunate to come out of there with a victory but on a neutral field, I think Seattle's D is too much for N.E here.

---

The sorry axx GB def contained the the entire hawks offense for 55 minutes...

hawks def is over rate...offense is on par.

Hawks need all kind tricks to win the NFC...BillyCheck will not be out trick. Monkeys will not trick human twice.

NE Large.

---

Pats would of almost certainly lost to the Ravens had they not pulled trick formations out of their bag of tricks.

Classic case of building info around your perception instead of letting the info guide you to a perception.

SiuLungBao

All-Star

Joined: Nov, 2009

Posts: 12241

Posted: Jan. 19, 2015 - 5:38 AM ET #6

Billacheat

goldengrants

Veteran

Joined: Dec, 2010

Posts: 1158

Posted: Jan. 19, 2015 - 6:13 AM ET #7

Sea wins 24-23 or 27-23

Seattle has LB who can cover better than Ravens
Seattle can contain Blount and Seattle secondary can cover ... Best thing is watching this D fly around together in sync...

luck was way off his game and Had no second receiver once Pats doubled TY...

Seattle can run better than Balt and Russell is a true dual threat... sea showed how quick and explosive their offense can be...

Pats center still a big question mark time to watch him hold up against Seattle...

HoldingXYZ

Captain

Joined: Sep, 2013

Posts: 6667

Posted: Jan. 19, 2015 - 6:41 AM ET #8

There's no doubt in my mind that the public will fall for it again. Op you're correct as far as the team that advances and doesn't cover , ends up covering the following game. However I think the Seahawks held back on greenbay because they needed to keep it a competitive game instead of shutting out greenbay. The big corporations that run this sh.t simply wouldn't allow it. So Green Bay had the 1h and the hawks had the second half. If you noticed the refs flagged the Seahawks with 10 penalties in the first half. I mean how many points is that off the board? Then in the final nail to the coffin on a back door win ,, the corner gave enough space for Wilson to complete that pass to his wr. All along they could've ran them over running beast mode all day. And they didn't even bother. The packs defense can't stop no one other than some pass happy team like the pats. And the pats didn't run the ball either against the pack. Gee I wonder why? Now there's your answer . New England goes to the superbowl and has the priv to tank it while the Seahawks are not under the radar. You cannot look steller all year long like when brady went 17-0 and tanked the sb. The houses losses would've been catastrophic if the pats covered. Similar situation here.

lucas57

Rookie

Joined: Sep, 2014

Posts: 503

Posted: Jan. 19, 2015 - 7:29 AM ET #9

If your already making bold statements on what going to happen in the Super Bowl . with out knowing who is hurt ,who got banged up ,whats going on with Shermans arm ,thinking this or that is going to happen based on yesterdays game ,the week before that games .then you might of found the reason why you not wining as much as you should...I only started wining when I learned not to jump on teams based on what they just accomplished .Perfect example is the NE game .So many people loved the Colts based on them beating the Bengals an the Broncos .They failed to see even when many threads by a lot more people than me,pointed out the matchup problems they will have pointed out the Broncos beat themselves ,they argue instead of taking it all in and at least look at another perspective .IMO some of you rather be right or have your favorite team win then win money which . is evident in all the teen age girl crush posts we all have to deal with in trying to see what the best play is . GL

iamnotpeterose

Prospect

Joined: Feb, 2007

Posts: 274

Posted: Jan. 19, 2015 - 7:31 AM ET #10

Quote Originally Posted by HoldingXYZ:

There's no doubt in my mind that the public will fall for it again. Op you're correct as far as the team that advances and doesn't cover , ends up covering the following game. However I think the Seahawks held back on greenbay because they needed to keep it a competitive game instead of shutting out greenbay. The big corporations that run this sh.t simply wouldn't allow it. So Green Bay had the 1h and the hawks had the second half. If you noticed the refs flagged the Seahawks with 10 penalties in the first half. I mean how many points is that off the board? Then in the final nail to the coffin on a back door win ,, the corner gave enough space for Wilson to complete that pass to his wr. All along they could've ran them over running beast mode all day. And they didn't even bother. The packs defense can't stop no one other than some pass happy team like the pats. And the pats didn't run the ball either against the pack. Gee I wonder why? Now there's your answer . New England goes to the superbowl and has the priv to tank it while the Seahawks are not under the radar. You cannot look steller all year long like when brady went 17-0 and tanked the sb. The houses losses would've been catastrophic if the pats covered. Similar situation here.

so Seattle had them right where they wanted them and just chose to only win of they could make an on side kick recovery, fluke 2 py conversion, and win the coin toss? What are your thoughts about 9/11?

inthetank

Veteran

Joined: Nov, 2010

Posts: 1193

Posted: Jan. 19, 2015 - 8:33 AM ET #11

If, key question is IF u watched the onside kick, the GB guy who was ready to catch that kick had his HANDS APART and let the ball hit him right between the eyes...Aren't you supposed to have your BEST HANDS TEAM there on onside kicks??.....And of course M. LYNCH runs UNTOUCHED, 25 yards for a td....And GB who passed at will for all but the last 3 minutes of the game, goes dive play, offf tackle run, another short run....And as Hold stated, the corner gave enough room for ME to catch that ball.....Everything in the NFL is a set up....And your name, IAMNOTPETERROSE, well, u gamble like him, and lose!.....And 9/11?....GODDELL, RAY LEWIS AND SHARPTON DID IT!

rudy22

Veteran

Joined: Nov, 2013

Posts: 2412

Posted: Jan. 19, 2015 - 8:47 AM ET #12

Quote Originally Posted by iamnotpeterose:

Awesome.

Envy123

Prospect

Joined: Dec, 2014

Posts: 87

Posted: Jan. 19, 2015 - 11:22 AM ET #13

Quote Originally Posted by lucas57:

If your already making bold statements on what going to happen in the Super Bowl . with out knowing who is hurt ,who got banged up ,whats going on with Shermans arm ,thinking this or that is going to happen based on yesterdays game ,the week before that games .then you might of found the reason why you not wining as much as you should...I only started wining when I learned not to jump on teams based on what they just accomplished .Perfect example is the NE game .So many people loved the Colts based on them beating the Bengals an the Broncos .They failed to see even when many threads by a lot more people than me,pointed out the matchup problems they will have pointed out the Broncos beat themselves ,they argue instead of taking it all in and at least look at another perspective .IMO some of you rather be right or have your favorite team win then win money which . is evident in all the teen age girl crush posts we all have to deal with in trying to see what the best play is . GL

Well if you looked at my other threads about Championship weekend, I was one of those pointing out the matchup problems and I provided analysis on both games and was 100% correct. I predicted Bluont would have 150 yrds+ and 3 tds. I don't jump to conclusions and have been winning tons this season. I just know how the public will react to what just happened and that makes me want to take the Hawks to the bank. I'll wait because I think Seattle will be a dog by S.B to be honest. GL with your plays

LETGOPACK1234

All-Star

Joined: Feb, 2011

Posts: 12243

Posted: Jan. 19, 2015 - 11:39 AM ET #14

Quote Originally Posted by HoldingXYZ:

There's no doubt in my mind that the public will fall for it again. Op you're correct as far as the team that advances and doesn't cover , ends up covering the following game. However I think the Seahawks held back on greenbay because they needed to keep it a competitive game instead of shutting out greenbay. The big corporations that run this sh.t simply wouldn't allow it. So Green Bay had the 1h and the hawks had the second half. If you noticed the refs flagged the Seahawks with 10 penalties in the first half. I mean how many points is that off the board? Then in the final nail to the coffin on a back door win ,, the corner gave enough space for Wilson to complete that pass to his wr. All along they could've ran them over running beast mode all day. And they didn't even bother. The packs defense can't stop no one other than some pass happy team like the pats. And the pats didn't run the ball either against the pack. Gee I wonder why? Now there's your answer . New England goes to the superbowl and has the priv to tank it while the Seahawks are not under the radar. You cannot look steller all year long like when brady went 17-0 and tanked the sb. The houses losses would've been catastrophic if the pats covered. Similar situation here.

Dude...can I have some drugs??

Maybe it had to do with Capers being a moron and playing 4 deep prevent the last 4 minutes of the game...

Seattle did nothing until prevent defense

Im sure Seattle was just waiting along all game, then decided they would use a fake field to get their first score

cucamonga

Prospect

Joined: Apr, 2010

Posts: 236

Posted: Jan. 19, 2015 - 12:36 PM ET #15

THE PLAYER WHO FUMBLED THE BALL ON THE ONSIDE KICK WSNT SUPPOSE TO TRY TO CATCH IT. HE WAS SUPPOSE TO BLOCK. DONT YOU WATCH ESPN

smarterthanyou

Banned

Joined: Jul, 2014

Posts: 2341

Posted: Jan. 19, 2015 - 12:41 PM ET #16

belic will definitely plan to stop lynch and put it all on wilson--and given 2 weeks, i'd guess his plan will be very successful.

now whether ne offense can be successful is another story.

statfreak

Veteran

Joined: Nov, 2007

Posts: 2241

Posted: Jan. 19, 2015 - 2:08 PM ET #17

what about colts who won vs denver who had peyton manning hurt?? shouldnt have they coevered at NE??

habs1

Banned

Joined: Sep, 2013

Posts: 948

Posted: Jan. 19, 2015 - 4:44 PM ET #18

Quote Originally Posted by cucamonga:

THE PLAYER WHO FUMBLED THE BALL ON THE ONSIDE KICK WSNT SUPPOSE TO TRY TO CATCH IT. HE WAS SUPPOSE TO BLOCK. DONT YOU WATCH ESPN

He did not fumble it moron, the ball went through his hands and hit his nogin.Do you not watch ESPN?

98ITR

Banned

Joined: Feb, 2008

Posts: 4870

Posted: Jan. 20, 2015 - 10:25 AM ET #19

Quote Originally Posted by cucamonga:

THE PLAYER WHO FUMBLED THE BALL ON THE ONSIDE KICK WSNT SUPPOSE TO TRY TO CATCH IT. HE WAS SUPPOSE TO BLOCK. DONT YOU WATCH ESPN

He should have left it for J Nelson right behind him

98ITR

Banned

Joined: Feb, 2008

Posts: 4870

Posted: Jan. 20, 2015 - 10:31 AM ET #20

I agree bud.. Hawks win this.. Even if Brady tries the short passing game like what they did with Baltimore the Carrol will have that covered. Wagner should be able to cover Vereen.. Thomas or Chancellor on Gronk will be nice to see.. I am sure Sherman will be covering Edelman even with 1 arm.