Here are my plays for the divisional round this weekend. If I lose, I will probably die, or at best, just not get laid for a while. I'll be watching the games this weekend on a stopover in Pocatello, Idaho. If anybody wants to, you can catch up with me there at Chubby's Sports Bar/gas station to watch the games and hang out. First round is on me (draft only).
SF -2.5 Wagering a month's worth of medication money - TOP PLAY
ATL -2.5 Wagering enough to pay a hot hooker for an Around-The-World (buttfucking, toe sucking, I dress like a pilot, everything. She will be smoking hot like at least a 6)
DEN -9 Wagering trashy crack person blow job money
Here are my plays for the divisional round this weekend. If I lose, I will probably die, or at best, just not get laid for a while. I'll be watching the games this weekend on a stopover in Pocatello, Idaho. If anybody wants to, you can catch up with me there at Chubby's Sports Bar/gas station to watch the games and hang out. First round is on me (draft only).
SF -2.5 Wagering a month's worth of medication money - TOP PLAY
ATL -2.5 Wagering enough to pay a hot hooker for an Around-The-World (buttfucking, toe sucking, I dress like a pilot, everything. She will be smoking hot like at least a 6)
DEN -9 Wagering trashy crack person blow job money
Kaepernick will single-handedly decide if you get your meds. But I think you are good for the trashy crack female blow job money at the very least. GL
I disagree to an extent. I see SF going with a very balnced, slighlty conservative approach for 2 reasons. Obviously, they want to avoid a shootout and keep the ball out of Rodger's hands as much as possible. Also, Frank Gore will run the ball effectively against that GB D which, although healthier, is still vulnerable.
SF has pretty much only had difficulty in the second half of the season against teams with a strong run defense (STL, SEA, and HOU). GB is not at that level. Adrian Peterson ran all over them twice, and was held to 100 yards last week only because there was no QB threat.
Kaepernick will succeed through play-action passing, and his feet, after the run is established as the focal point of the offense. SF is rested, they are fundamentally sound on both sides of the ball, and have an edge in coaching IMO. I see a 27-17 type game.
I hope I win this bet, because I need my meds, but then again, I also like having my junk licked on. I figure if I go 3-1, I'll probably have my cake and eat it too, so to speak.
0
Quote Originally Posted by tonyrome:
Kaepernick will single-handedly decide if you get your meds. But I think you are good for the trashy crack female blow job money at the very least. GL
I disagree to an extent. I see SF going with a very balnced, slighlty conservative approach for 2 reasons. Obviously, they want to avoid a shootout and keep the ball out of Rodger's hands as much as possible. Also, Frank Gore will run the ball effectively against that GB D which, although healthier, is still vulnerable.
SF has pretty much only had difficulty in the second half of the season against teams with a strong run defense (STL, SEA, and HOU). GB is not at that level. Adrian Peterson ran all over them twice, and was held to 100 yards last week only because there was no QB threat.
Kaepernick will succeed through play-action passing, and his feet, after the run is established as the focal point of the offense. SF is rested, they are fundamentally sound on both sides of the ball, and have an edge in coaching IMO. I see a 27-17 type game.
I hope I win this bet, because I need my meds, but then again, I also like having my junk licked on. I figure if I go 3-1, I'll probably have my cake and eat it too, so to speak.
2-2........sf and houston so I guess you will still be alive but will get to play how up got aids in the first place with you tranny hooker.......gl playing pork swords with the lady boys buahaahaahaa!
0
2-2........sf and houston so I guess you will still be alive but will get to play how up got aids in the first place with you tranny hooker.......gl playing pork swords with the lady boys buahaahaahaa!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.