//
Umm, objectivity would be nice.
The Giants have so many injuries on defence. Plus, Eli Manning throws more interceptions than jenna Jameson sex partners.
Redskins win this one outright. When the NYG get healthy, they have potential. Not yet.
Umm, objectivity would be nice.
The Giants have so many injuries on defence. Plus, Eli Manning throws more interceptions than jenna Jameson sex partners.
Redskins win this one outright. When the NYG get healthy, they have potential. Not yet.
Umm, objectivity would be nice.
The Giants have so many injuries on defence. Plus, Eli Manning throws more interceptions than jenna Jameson sex partners.
Redskins win this one outright. When the NYG get healthy, they have potential. Not yet.
Umm, objectivity would be nice.
The Giants have so many injuries on defence. Plus, Eli Manning throws more interceptions than jenna Jameson sex partners.
Redskins win this one outright. When the NYG get healthy, they have potential. Not yet.
Its an NFC East battle and will be a close game throughout. I think the Giants defense does not get exploited by this Skins team and they get the W. I think it is closer than anticipated though.
Its an NFC East battle and will be a close game throughout. I think the Giants defense does not get exploited by this Skins team and they get the W. I think it is closer than anticipated though.
Its an NFC East battle and will be a close game throughout. I think the Giants defense does not get exploited by this Skins team and they get the W. I think it is closer than anticipated though.
Its an NFC East battle and will be a close game throughout. I think the Giants defense does not get exploited by this Skins team and they get the W. I think it is closer than anticipated though.
The Giants are a worse team than last year. I like WAS to surprise.
Definitely not a lock, as you alluded to earlier. If I had to pick one "lock," I'd say ATL to cover the spread against Chicago. But, I never bet heavy in Week 1. I like to learn a bit more about the teams.
The Giants are a worse team than last year. I like WAS to surprise.
Definitely not a lock, as you alluded to earlier. If I had to pick one "lock," I'd say ATL to cover the spread against Chicago. But, I never bet heavy in Week 1. I like to learn a bit more about the teams.
The Giants are a worse team than last year. I like WAS to surprise.
Definitely not a lock, as you alluded to earlier. If I had to pick one "lock," I'd say ATL to cover the spread against Chicago. But, I never bet heavy in Week 1. I like to learn a bit more about the teams.
The Giants are a worse team than last year. I like WAS to surprise.
Definitely not a lock, as you alluded to earlier. If I had to pick one "lock," I'd say ATL to cover the spread against Chicago. But, I never bet heavy in Week 1. I like to learn a bit more about the teams.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.