Why the hell did Shurmer go for 2???

I thought Mike Vrabel made the most ridiculous 2 point conversion I had ever seen. Well lo and behold it takes one day for that stupidity to be topped. Whether you agree with it or not, at least Vrabel was trying to win the game with a significant dawg. How in the hell can Schumer justify going for 2 when if he fails, he would be in this same exact spot again? Does this clown not know that an extra point is converted 95 % of the time and a 2 point conversion about 30 %??? Does he not know the math, that a touchdown gets them 7 points down and a miss means they are down 8???

Shurmer got the Vegas report that 75% of the public had the Falcons -3.5 or -4.  That's why he went for the 2 pt conversion. 

Did u ever think of that the Giants were down 3 with that 2 pt conversion and if that they regained possession with the onsides kick they could have had a chance to tie up the game with a FG?? Sry for your square bet Falcons loss

Unfortunately for you dumbass, I had over 26 for the 2nd half. I didn't even need the 2 point conversion at the end to cover.

I agree man that is highly unusual. But if its fixed he was playing not to cover. That was stupid unless kicker was hurt or something

You mean Vrabel made the most ridiculous 2 point ATTEMPT you ever seen(doubt it) and then justify it by saying he was trying to win the game. Well whats so ridiculous about trying to win the game? especially with the trouble they've been having scoring...

Schurmer going for 2 being 14 points down was just plain dumb. Its one thing to do that when you're in  a situation like Vrabel with the game on the line against a superior team but 14 points down you go for 2 on your 2nd TD