Public were heavy on the overs this past Sunday. And will be once again NO DOUBT in my mind come super bowl Sunday. With the publics perceived perception the way the games played out on Sunday I would be extremely cautious playing the over on the most gambled on one game showdown in sports. Of course NO ONE wants to play an under with Brady and Ryan at the helm then please listen to me and Don't play the up or down in this game and pick a side because if you do and it's not an under I have a good feeling that Vegas wins and you lose......You've Been warned
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Public were heavy on the overs this past Sunday. And will be once again NO DOUBT in my mind come super bowl Sunday. With the publics perceived perception the way the games played out on Sunday I would be extremely cautious playing the over on the most gambled on one game showdown in sports. Of course NO ONE wants to play an under with Brady and Ryan at the helm then please listen to me and Don't play the up or down in this game and pick a side because if you do and it's not an under I have a good feeling that Vegas wins and you lose......You've Been warned
Public were heavy on the overs this past Sunday. And will be once again NO DOUBT in my mind come super bowl Sunday. With the publics perceived perception the way the games played out on Sunday I would be extremely cautious playing the over on the most gambled on one game showdown in sports. Of course NO ONE wants to play an under with Brady and Ryan at the helm then please listen to me and Don't play the up or down in this game and pick a side because if you do and it's not an under I have a good feeling that Vegas wins and you lose......You've Been warned
LAS VEGAS AND THE ONLINE BOOKS ALWAYS WIN ON SUPER BOWL. ONLY BECAUSE 90% OF THESE FOOLS THINK THESE GAMES ARE REAL LMAO. SAME FOOLS THAT THINK CAM NEWTON DIDN'T THROW SUPER BOWL 50 LMAO.
0
Quote Originally Posted by justliketoplay:
Public were heavy on the overs this past Sunday. And will be once again NO DOUBT in my mind come super bowl Sunday. With the publics perceived perception the way the games played out on Sunday I would be extremely cautious playing the over on the most gambled on one game showdown in sports. Of course NO ONE wants to play an under with Brady and Ryan at the helm then please listen to me and Don't play the up or down in this game and pick a side because if you do and it's not an under I have a good feeling that Vegas wins and you lose......You've Been warned
LAS VEGAS AND THE ONLINE BOOKS ALWAYS WIN ON SUPER BOWL. ONLY BECAUSE 90% OF THESE FOOLS THINK THESE GAMES ARE REAL LMAO. SAME FOOLS THAT THINK CAM NEWTON DIDN'T THROW SUPER BOWL 50 LMAO.
LAS VEGAS AND THE ONLINE BOOKS ALWAYS WIN ON SUPER BOWL. ONLY BECAUSE 90% OF THESE FOOLS THINK THESE GAMES ARE REAL LMAO. SAME FOOLS THAT THINK CAM NEWTON DIDN'T THROW SUPER BOWL 50 LMAO.
Dead Spot On Slops!
0
Quote Originally Posted by slops:
LAS VEGAS AND THE ONLINE BOOKS ALWAYS WIN ON SUPER BOWL. ONLY BECAUSE 90% OF THESE FOOLS THINK THESE GAMES ARE REAL LMAO. SAME FOOLS THAT THINK CAM NEWTON DIDN'T THROW SUPER BOWL 50 LMAO.
too bad favs have ruled the playoffs and so have overs... Its a new time guys just like the NBA playoffs last season when all the favs won till the NBA finals. Public has been and will continue to win. Especially playing Unders, its dumbest thing u can do.
0
too bad favs have ruled the playoffs and so have overs... Its a new time guys just like the NBA playoffs last season when all the favs won till the NBA finals. Public has been and will continue to win. Especially playing Unders, its dumbest thing u can do.
slops saying sportsbooks win every superbowl. slops loves New England which will be the biggest public bet ever..lol
Agreed and of course it's all about the 123,or 321 or the 6969 that is sooo complicated our small minds won't understand because he is such s fking genius
0
Quote Originally Posted by markpa:
slops saying sportsbooks win every superbowl. slops loves New England which will be the biggest public bet ever..lol
Agreed and of course it's all about the 123,or 321 or the 6969 that is sooo complicated our small minds won't understand because he is such s fking genius
LAS VEGAS AND THE ONLINE BOOKS ALWAYS WIN ON SUPER BOWL. ONLY BECAUSE 90% OF THESE FOOLS THINK THESE GAMES ARE REAL LMAO. SAME FOOLS THAT THINK CAM NEWTON DIDN'T THROW SUPER BOWL 50 LMAO.
Go hang out with Jesse Ventura you weirdo! People like you are so naive and constantly cry conspiracy. "Vegas" doesn't need to "fix" a game like this, they're gonna make a boat load of money regardless of who wins because everybody and their mother will be coming out of the woodwork to throw all their money on silly props, etc.
0
Quote Originally Posted by slops:
LAS VEGAS AND THE ONLINE BOOKS ALWAYS WIN ON SUPER BOWL. ONLY BECAUSE 90% OF THESE FOOLS THINK THESE GAMES ARE REAL LMAO. SAME FOOLS THAT THINK CAM NEWTON DIDN'T THROW SUPER BOWL 50 LMAO.
Go hang out with Jesse Ventura you weirdo! People like you are so naive and constantly cry conspiracy. "Vegas" doesn't need to "fix" a game like this, they're gonna make a boat load of money regardless of who wins because everybody and their mother will be coming out of the woodwork to throw all their money on silly props, etc.
Go hang out with Jesse Ventura you weirdo! People like you are so naive and constantly cry conspiracy. "Vegas" doesn't need to "fix" a game like this, they're gonna make a boat load of money regardless of who wins because everybody and their mother will be coming out of the woodwork to throw all their money on silly props, etc.
YOU'RE A FOOL IF YOU THINK THESE GAMES AREN'T FIXED. DO YOU HONESTLY THINK NFL OWNERS AND CASINOS WOULD LEAVE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS UP TO CHANCE? LMAO. GTFO.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Dolphan:
Go hang out with Jesse Ventura you weirdo! People like you are so naive and constantly cry conspiracy. "Vegas" doesn't need to "fix" a game like this, they're gonna make a boat load of money regardless of who wins because everybody and their mother will be coming out of the woodwork to throw all their money on silly props, etc.
YOU'RE A FOOL IF YOU THINK THESE GAMES AREN'T FIXED. DO YOU HONESTLY THINK NFL OWNERS AND CASINOS WOULD LEAVE BILLIONS OF DOLLARS UP TO CHANCE? LMAO. GTFO.
Also you are claiming that they picked the winner out in advance by trading a player with a 131 connect. In that case, how would the NFL know which side would have the most money on it, before the fact?
Don't you think they would CHANGE a script, if too many billions were to be lost on the patriots?
Let's see if you can answer these "tough" questions. If not, then we can no longer hold your advice as credible. Because if you were able to answer these, or had answers for these, then you surely would. If you do not answer, it's just going to make you look stupid
LMAO. IT'S OBVIOUS YOU WANT TO KNOW THE INFO I KNOW. YOU'RE NOT AT THAT LEVEL OF KNOWLEDGE YET.
0
Quote Originally Posted by plays4all:
Also you are claiming that they picked the winner out in advance by trading a player with a 131 connect. In that case, how would the NFL know which side would have the most money on it, before the fact?
Don't you think they would CHANGE a script, if too many billions were to be lost on the patriots?
Let's see if you can answer these "tough" questions. If not, then we can no longer hold your advice as credible. Because if you were able to answer these, or had answers for these, then you surely would. If you do not answer, it's just going to make you look stupid
LMAO. IT'S OBVIOUS YOU WANT TO KNOW THE INFO I KNOW. YOU'RE NOT AT THAT LEVEL OF KNOWLEDGE YET.
Public were heavy on the overs this past Sunday. And will be once again NO DOUBT in my mind come super bowl Sunday. With the publics perceived perception the way the games played out on Sunday I would be extremely cautious playing the over on the most gambled on one game showdown in sports. Of course NO ONE wants to play an under with Brady and Ryan at the helm then please listen to me and Don't play the up or down in this game and pick a side because if you do and it's not an under I have a good feeling that Vegas wins and you lose......You've Been warned
I'm guessing you and Guitar Boy are starting a franchise called:
YOU'VE BEEN WARNED
How much is the franchise, and what percentage of the gross do you have to pay to you morons?
0
Quote Originally Posted by justliketoplay:
Public were heavy on the overs this past Sunday. And will be once again NO DOUBT in my mind come super bowl Sunday. With the publics perceived perception the way the games played out on Sunday I would be extremely cautious playing the over on the most gambled on one game showdown in sports. Of course NO ONE wants to play an under with Brady and Ryan at the helm then please listen to me and Don't play the up or down in this game and pick a side because if you do and it's not an under I have a good feeling that Vegas wins and you lose......You've Been warned
I'm guessing you and Guitar Boy are starting a franchise called:
YOU'VE BEEN WARNED
How much is the franchise, and what percentage of the gross do you have to pay to you morons?
LAS VEGAS AND THE ONLINE BOOKS ALWAYS WIN ON SUPER BOWL. ONLY BECAUSE 90% OF THESE FOOLS THINK THESE GAMES ARE REAL LMAO. SAME FOOLS THAT THINK CAM NEWTON DIDN'T THROW SUPER BOWL 50 LMAO.
I know from years of experience how your hand will be shaking placing this bet. I know how many times you will postpone taking it. I know how you will be hiding your bet even if you took it from your friends and the family so they won't think you're a complete idiot. And, I also know how triumphant you will the minute after the game is over. I also know how you will be showing your winning ticket to every Tom, person and Harry that will come up your way. I've been there. With the same Broncos, but on an opposite side. I had people calling me a lunatic when I took the Seahawks against the Broncos two seasons ago. I also remember how ridiculous I looked after a goal line interception by the Pats against the Seahawks in the last Super Bowl. The Ravens vs the Niners was the easiest win - I agree. Well, this Super Bowl is nothing like the previous ones. We have here an absolute and undisputed favorite with Cam Newton in the role of a Superman. We have a team who literally destroyed everything on its way 90% of the games. And the Panthers did it in the first half already. I know. Because we cashed on most of those first half wins. And who they have on an opposite side? The Broncos led by a semi retired Senior Citizen who can hardly tie up his shoes those days. Every rib and every bone is asking Peyton - please quit bro, retire, screw the football. It is not your game anymore. There is a new king. Long live the new king. MJ mentored him, he's friends with LBJ and he is the most selling thing in NFL today.
To be short - we have an old school versus the new wild wild west football where every play can be scoring one, defensive or offensive. The Panthers should destroy the ailing and tired Broncos by at least 35 points already in the first half. And why not? They did destroy the Seahawks that way -and the Seahawks are the Seahawks who are very well in the defensive department. The Broncos are good too - but the Seahwaks are the name brand for the kind of defense that should have hold the Panthers from running away. And then the Cardinals. The way they were destroyed was inconceivable too. Suddenly they looked like the shadow of themselves. And we got even more convinced that the line for the Super Bowl - although against the Broncos who just beat the Brady's bunch -should have at least opened up at -9.5. The least. And the first half at all should have been or removed from the table or opened at the Panthers -7.5. Why not? Look at their first halves in the playoffs. And we all remember what happened when the Newton and Newtronnetes meet the Mannings. Yes. Mannings cover no matter how ridiculous that looks. And that was a lesser Manning we're talking about -Eli.
The Panthers away from home facing a man who build at least few floors in Casinos and Hotels in Vegas by rolling over at the right moment - all this smells like the dues paid by the new rising star to the old and wise. No way Peyton Manning is walking away from this one without the ring. If that happens - that will be the beginning of a new era when the Vegas have lost it's grip.
I bet on Vegas. I bet on Peyton Manning. I bet on Phix is ON
0
Quote Originally Posted by slops:
LAS VEGAS AND THE ONLINE BOOKS ALWAYS WIN ON SUPER BOWL. ONLY BECAUSE 90% OF THESE FOOLS THINK THESE GAMES ARE REAL LMAO. SAME FOOLS THAT THINK CAM NEWTON DIDN'T THROW SUPER BOWL 50 LMAO.
I know from years of experience how your hand will be shaking placing this bet. I know how many times you will postpone taking it. I know how you will be hiding your bet even if you took it from your friends and the family so they won't think you're a complete idiot. And, I also know how triumphant you will the minute after the game is over. I also know how you will be showing your winning ticket to every Tom, person and Harry that will come up your way. I've been there. With the same Broncos, but on an opposite side. I had people calling me a lunatic when I took the Seahawks against the Broncos two seasons ago. I also remember how ridiculous I looked after a goal line interception by the Pats against the Seahawks in the last Super Bowl. The Ravens vs the Niners was the easiest win - I agree. Well, this Super Bowl is nothing like the previous ones. We have here an absolute and undisputed favorite with Cam Newton in the role of a Superman. We have a team who literally destroyed everything on its way 90% of the games. And the Panthers did it in the first half already. I know. Because we cashed on most of those first half wins. And who they have on an opposite side? The Broncos led by a semi retired Senior Citizen who can hardly tie up his shoes those days. Every rib and every bone is asking Peyton - please quit bro, retire, screw the football. It is not your game anymore. There is a new king. Long live the new king. MJ mentored him, he's friends with LBJ and he is the most selling thing in NFL today.
To be short - we have an old school versus the new wild wild west football where every play can be scoring one, defensive or offensive. The Panthers should destroy the ailing and tired Broncos by at least 35 points already in the first half. And why not? They did destroy the Seahawks that way -and the Seahawks are the Seahawks who are very well in the defensive department. The Broncos are good too - but the Seahwaks are the name brand for the kind of defense that should have hold the Panthers from running away. And then the Cardinals. The way they were destroyed was inconceivable too. Suddenly they looked like the shadow of themselves. And we got even more convinced that the line for the Super Bowl - although against the Broncos who just beat the Brady's bunch -should have at least opened up at -9.5. The least. And the first half at all should have been or removed from the table or opened at the Panthers -7.5. Why not? Look at their first halves in the playoffs. And we all remember what happened when the Newton and Newtronnetes meet the Mannings. Yes. Mannings cover no matter how ridiculous that looks. And that was a lesser Manning we're talking about -Eli.
The Panthers away from home facing a man who build at least few floors in Casinos and Hotels in Vegas by rolling over at the right moment - all this smells like the dues paid by the new rising star to the old and wise. No way Peyton Manning is walking away from this one without the ring. If that happens - that will be the beginning of a new era when the Vegas have lost it's grip.
I bet on Vegas. I bet on Peyton Manning. I bet on Phix is ON
I'm new here on your site and I have to say I've never read more insane foolish insignificant trite CRAP in my 56 years on this planet. It's so bad I'm laughing not to cry. Conspiracies abound, Scientology theories of " levels " of logic, fools chasing fools. Not everyone mind you, and those who know football know who I am talking about. But Damn, how about some stats, the injury reports, thoughts on the matchups and who can neutralize who? What's Belichik gonna do with a Julio, does Dan Quin try to hurry Brady and blitz every down? Oh well, it troubles my sleep.
0
I'm new here on your site and I have to say I've never read more insane foolish insignificant trite CRAP in my 56 years on this planet. It's so bad I'm laughing not to cry. Conspiracies abound, Scientology theories of " levels " of logic, fools chasing fools. Not everyone mind you, and those who know football know who I am talking about. But Damn, how about some stats, the injury reports, thoughts on the matchups and who can neutralize who? What's Belichik gonna do with a Julio, does Dan Quin try to hurry Brady and blitz every down? Oh well, it troubles my sleep.
I'm new here on your site and I have to say I've never read more insane foolish insignificant trite CRAP in my 56 years on this planet. It's so bad I'm laughing not to cry. Conspiracies abound, Scientology theories of " levels " of logic, fools chasing fools. Not everyone mind you, and those who know football know who I am talking about. But Damn, how about some stats, the injury reports, thoughts on the matchups and who can neutralize who? What's Belichik gonna do with a Julio, does Dan Quin try to hurry Brady and blitz every down? Oh well, it troubles my sleep.
SPOKEN LIKE A TRUE FISH.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Pentuppete:
I'm new here on your site and I have to say I've never read more insane foolish insignificant trite CRAP in my 56 years on this planet. It's so bad I'm laughing not to cry. Conspiracies abound, Scientology theories of " levels " of logic, fools chasing fools. Not everyone mind you, and those who know football know who I am talking about. But Damn, how about some stats, the injury reports, thoughts on the matchups and who can neutralize who? What's Belichik gonna do with a Julio, does Dan Quin try to hurry Brady and blitz every down? Oh well, it troubles my sleep.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.