Sorry guys puck just doesn't bounce right some days. Days like this are to be expected. Should have played what I recommended to a few guys on the forum yesterday..
Detroit ML won
Montreal ML won
Washington Tie + under. Won
Chicago. ML lost
File it under next time. I will look at today's games 2 in hockey and some NBA + NCAA games. Will post picks soon as possible. Tonight let's go 4-0.
As always good luck.
3
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Sorry guys puck just doesn't bounce right some days. Days like this are to be expected. Should have played what I recommended to a few guys on the forum yesterday..
Detroit ML won
Montreal ML won
Washington Tie + under. Won
Chicago. ML lost
File it under next time. I will look at today's games 2 in hockey and some NBA + NCAA games. Will post picks soon as possible. Tonight let's go 4-0.
Good stuff as always.....love the way you stay positive....the unpredictability of Sports happens...that's what makes it fun and exciting....you have an amazing record and definitely have a knack for picking winner's....continued success...Cheers
1
Good stuff as always.....love the way you stay positive....the unpredictability of Sports happens...that's what makes it fun and exciting....you have an amazing record and definitely have a knack for picking winner's....continued success...Cheers
@FillyFlier16 Yes last 3 games vs.Buffalo he's had 14 shots on net. Averaging 4.7 shots per game. Plus Sabres and Penguins are 30 and 31 in shots allowed. Another good prop is Vegas and Carolina no goal 1st 10 mins of game. In last 7 games only 1 goal scored in 1st 10 mins. Good luck
Appreciate your insight and feedback Underbar.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Underbar:
@FillyFlier16 Yes last 3 games vs.Buffalo he's had 14 shots on net. Averaging 4.7 shots per game. Plus Sabres and Penguins are 30 and 31 in shots allowed. Another good prop is Vegas and Carolina no goal 1st 10 mins of game. In last 7 games only 1 goal scored in 1st 10 mins. Good luck
So Rust over 2.5 shots was a loser, as he ended up with 2 shots on net. However I find it interesting that dyamarik was able to find Rust at 1.5 shots for the game, which turned out to be a winner. I asked him on his thread where he was able to find this number for Rust but did not receive a reply (as of yet). In closing, past stats don't always bode well for the present when it comes to betting.
find a new book then….its 2025. Honestly how people still can’t grasp this is wild. Not being rude, just honest.
0
Quote Originally Posted by FillyFlier16:
So Rust over 2.5 shots was a loser, as he ended up with 2 shots on net. However I find it interesting that dyamarik was able to find Rust at 1.5 shots for the game, which turned out to be a winner. I asked him on his thread where he was able to find this number for Rust but did not receive a reply (as of yet). In closing, past stats don't always bode well for the present when it comes to betting.
find a new book then….its 2025. Honestly how people still can’t grasp this is wild. Not being rude, just honest.
I'm not about to open an account at every book or check all the books for lines. If I lose i lose. I use one book that I trust that has always paid out.Their lines are usually really good. I will be totally honest I was debating between over 2.5 and Vegas vs Carolina no goal 1st 10 mins. Went the wrong way but I still put it on my post for others to consider. Went 2-2 yesterday. Enough digressing on to today. Best of luck.
0
@vaas187
I'm not about to open an account at every book or check all the books for lines. If I lose i lose. I use one book that I trust that has always paid out.Their lines are usually really good. I will be totally honest I was debating between over 2.5 and Vegas vs Carolina no goal 1st 10 mins. Went the wrong way but I still put it on my post for others to consider. Went 2-2 yesterday. Enough digressing on to today. Best of luck.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.