All Forums | NHL Betting

Blackhawks suck

...
Participants:
Search model icon
Views: 1862
Posts: 18
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2015
Posts: 80
Posted: #1
How can you not beat a depleted, poor defensive, crap goalie team. Getting raped 4-1 right now as we speak.
 
Covers Linesmen
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2001
Posts: 87445
Posted: #2
You mean the team they are tied with in the standings before the game started and the same Dallas team that is 21-10-1 at home ?
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2012
Posts: 4815
Posted: #3
Apparently this game means nothing to Chicago.  They must be tired from playing the night prior.  Oh wait... They had the prior day off and DONT PLAY EITHER SATURDAY OR SUNDAY.   wow.  great effort Chicago.  Glad u guys showed the faintest interest 
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Sep, 2015
Posts: 1631
Posted: #4
strange, expected chicago to fair much better tonight
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2013
Posts: 6989
Posted: #5
Every year there's a thread like this. Just cause they are not doing well right now does not mean they suck. We are talking about the defending champs here. That's just them but playoff comes it's a different story
Bet the right way and never chase!
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: May, 2010
Posts: 35
Posted: #6
[Quote: Originally Posted by Lippsman] You mean the team they are tied with in the standings before the game started and the same Dallas team that is 21-10-1 at home ? [/Quote exactly
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jun, 2015
Posts: 1573
Posted: #7
Quote Originally Posted by Lippsman:

You mean the team they are tied with in the standings before the game started and the same Dallas team that is 21-10-1 at home ?

he meant the same team that is 2-1 vs chicago this season
 
Prospect
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2016
Posts: 187
Posted: #8
Quote Originally Posted by Lippsman:

You mean the team they are tied with in the standings before the game started and the same Dallas team that is 21-10-1 at home ?
didnt bet on this game but you're taking out of context stats given that dallas has dropped games to some terrible teams as of late I could make the argument if chicago won that dallas was a stupid bet because dallas lost at home to the jets, detroit, nyr and boston. 

also dallas has been ice cold as of late compared to the start of the season when they were obliterating teams left and right. its really silly to think that the current standings are an indication of how a team will stack up
 
Covers Linesmen
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2001
Posts: 87445
Posted: #9
Quote Originally Posted by farmzeh:

didnt bet on this game but you're taking out of context stats given that dallas has dropped games to some terrible teams as of late I could make the argument if chicago won that dallas was a stupid bet because dallas lost at home to the jets, detroit, nyr and boston. 

also dallas has been ice cold as of late compared to the start of the season when they were obliterating teams left and right. its really silly to think that the current standings are an indication of how a team will stack up

Chicago 1
Dallas 4

You want to tell me again how silly my thought process is again. Dallas already beat them twice this year and the Hawks were 3-4 in their L 7 games. So yeah, Hawks not exactly lighting up the W column as of late. 

If, if, if.....Chicago didn't win.  

Maybe it was the stupid thread of saying how the Hawks suck that gets me riled up.  Always this crap this time of year from noobs betting on pucks when football is over.  Every team sucks if they lose a game or some noob wagers high juice -200 that thinks its always going to win.

Bah

 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Nov, 2013
Posts: 11332
Posted: #10
Quote Originally Posted by Underdogchance:

@Lippsman 

In some other thread, when i post my projected lines (which is strictly from math model) Dallas -124. Somebody told me, that my data is junk. My data is junk, after I put 1 year into it. Improving and improving, simulating games, spend hours and hours. No respect at all. 

What I hate most is the way how people communicate. 

"Your picks are crap"
"This is junk"
"This sucks"
"If I am in the net, this would be -200"
"If you want to win, just fade that and that guy"
"This team will win 100%"

and so on and so on...

But, hey, we can not change it. Betting world and people, who bet. It was the same 15 ago and it is the same now. Most of them without any strategy and when they lose, they blame everyone but not themselves. 


100% Agree Sr
 
Covers Linesmen
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2001
Posts: 87445
Posted: #11
Quote Originally Posted by Underdogchance:

@Lippsman 

In some other thread, when i post my projected lines (which is strictly from math model) Dallas -124. Somebody told me, that my data is junk. My data is junk, after I put 1 year into it. Improving and improving, simulating games, spend hours and hours. No respect at all. 

What I hate most is the way how people communicate. 

"Your picks are crap"
"This is junk"
"This sucks"
"If I am in the net, this would be -200"
"If you want to win, just fade that and that guy"
"This team will win 100%"

and so on and so on...

But, hey, we can not change it. Betting world and people, who bet. It was the same 15 ago and it is the same now. Most of them without any strategy and when they lose, they blame everyone but not themselves. 

 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Aug, 2011
Posts: 2270
Posted: #12
This stupid thread doesn't even deserve a response but I just couldn't help myself. The warriors must also suck because they lost to the lakers and got blown out in portland a month ago, and the spurs must also suck because they got blown out by the warriors.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2013
Posts: 2759
Posted: #13
5 and 8 in last 13. They are def overrated. Toews is awesome but on pace for 54 points. That's absolute garbage for his contract. 

They don't look like contender right now
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Mar, 2016
Posts: 148
Posted: #14
SJ must suck as well because they got owned by NJ the other night? With that in m I would advise you wager everything on Wash tonight! Looks like a lock as wash is the best and SJ sucks! 
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 6495
Posted: #15
The way i see it is, the blackhawks don't suck, thats a given. But the team does a piss poor job of competing on a nightly basis. They routinely take periods off from what i've seen and rarely play a full 60 minute game. I can understand just coasting until the playoffs, but these guys are getting paid big bucks. This includes being entertainers and doing your job well and playing hard. The blackhawks don't play hard most games, they rely on the talent they have and just showing up to the arena hoping that automatically translates into a win. Its really hard to predict right now how they'll fare in the playoffs. I have a feeling they pull what the SA Spurs did last year and throw in the motivation towel since they already won the championship the year prior. I'd stay clear of laying any serious juice on this team right now, they are lacking heart.
 
Veteran
Participation Meter
Joined: Jan, 2012
Posts: 4266
Posted: #16
Quote Originally Posted by Underdogchance:

@Lippsman 

In some other thread, when i post my projected lines (which is strictly from math model) Dallas -124. Somebody told me, that my data is junk. My data is junk, after I put 1 year into it. Improving and improving, simulating games, spend hours and hours. No respect at all. 

What I hate most is the way how people communicate. 

"Your picks are crap"
"This is junk"
"This sucks"
"If I am in the net, this would be -200"
"If you want to win, just fade that and that guy"
"This team will win 100%"

and so on and so on...

But, hey, we can not change it. Betting world and people, who bet. It was the same 15 ago and it is the same now. Most of them without any strategy and when they lose, they blame everyone but not themselves. 


You had Dallas as a -124 favorite with their backup goaltender and 3 defenseman out....that line is just incorrect, when the books have the other team as a -120, that should be a hint for you. It doesnt matter that the Stars won, they could have won 10-0 and I would still be here telling you the same thing. 

If you dont take key injuries into account, then sorry, your "projected lines" are junk & only misleading people. Ofcourse, result oriented people always run their mouths after the fact, bet my life you wouldnt say a word if the Stars lose that game.

1 year you put into your "projected lines", I ve put over 10 years into sports betting buddy...learn to accept criticism.
 
Captain
Participation Meter
Joined: Feb, 2007
Posts: 6495
Posted: #17
another superb effort

i can't tell if this team is seriously just waiting for the playoffs or just inferior to their competition
 
 
Banned
Participation Meter
Joined: Oct, 2015
Posts: 2141
Posted: #18
again this thred is up hahhahaah
All Forums | NHL Betting
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.