The Jets are always such a huge disappointment. Edmonton is the up and coming team, although they have a long way to go. But the Oil will be a playoff team to be reckoned with soon, while the Jets will forever languish in mediocrity.
But as for tonite, who knows? I'm playing the Oilers. Just because.
0
The Jets are always such a huge disappointment. Edmonton is the up and coming team, although they have a long way to go. But the Oil will be a playoff team to be reckoned with soon, while the Jets will forever languish in mediocrity.
But as for tonite, who knows? I'm playing the Oilers. Just because.
I really like the Jest tonight. These western teams always play well in the opposing barn. Plus who the hell is in net for the Oil? Maybe better than the other 2 dummies they have
0
I really like the Jest tonight. These western teams always play well in the opposing barn. Plus who the hell is in net for the Oil? Maybe better than the other 2 dummies they have
Hey Guys I pick my spots--picked Denver in the Football forum 1 month prior to superbowl--go check my thread!
Tonight Hammer the.......
Winnipeg Jets--+110
Easy Winner
Congrats on your "Easy Winner". However, had Hendricks, Purcell, McDavid, Kassian, Pouliet, Gryba, and Korpikoski all either missed open nets, or great breakawy and scoring opps in the 3rd, the Oilers would have won in Reg, and this game wouldn't have seen OT. Then there were missed opps by BOTH teams in OT that should've ended the game.
So Jets winning in a Shootout, hardly qualifies as an "EASY WINNER" Again, you won, and congrats, but cut with the drama of this "Game of the Year" that you told people to Hammer the Jets.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SportsRefund:
Hey Guys I pick my spots--picked Denver in the Football forum 1 month prior to superbowl--go check my thread!
Tonight Hammer the.......
Winnipeg Jets--+110
Easy Winner
Congrats on your "Easy Winner". However, had Hendricks, Purcell, McDavid, Kassian, Pouliet, Gryba, and Korpikoski all either missed open nets, or great breakawy and scoring opps in the 3rd, the Oilers would have won in Reg, and this game wouldn't have seen OT. Then there were missed opps by BOTH teams in OT that should've ended the game.
So Jets winning in a Shootout, hardly qualifies as an "EASY WINNER" Again, you won, and congrats, but cut with the drama of this "Game of the Year" that you told people to Hammer the Jets.
I'm not trying to start anything, and personally, could care less if you want to list "Play of the Year"
However, there are people that will come here and blindly tail people, and buy into the hype with hard earned money at risk.
Why can't you just state your Plays w/o the added hyperbole
I congratulated you on your Play and win last night. But did you even watch the game? How can you honestly say "This was never in doubt". The game was tied after 3, tied after 5 minutes of OT (with 2 minutes of it a Jets 4 on 3 PP, where they didn't score), and went to the 3rd round of the Shootout before there was a winner.
How can you possibly say that the outcome was never in doubt??
And it's great you have confidence in your Plays, but please don't title your Thread for a game between the 2 last place teams in the Western Conference playing a game in the middle of February-
"The Game of the Year"
0
Hey SportsRefund,
I'm not trying to start anything, and personally, could care less if you want to list "Play of the Year"
However, there are people that will come here and blindly tail people, and buy into the hype with hard earned money at risk.
Why can't you just state your Plays w/o the added hyperbole
I congratulated you on your Play and win last night. But did you even watch the game? How can you honestly say "This was never in doubt". The game was tied after 3, tied after 5 minutes of OT (with 2 minutes of it a Jets 4 on 3 PP, where they didn't score), and went to the 3rd round of the Shootout before there was a winner.
How can you possibly say that the outcome was never in doubt??
And it's great you have confidence in your Plays, but please don't title your Thread for a game between the 2 last place teams in the Western Conference playing a game in the middle of February-
I'm not trying to start anything, and personally, could care less if you want to list "Play of the Year"
However, there are people that will come here and blindly tail people, and buy into the hype with hard earned money at risk.
Why can't you just state your Plays w/o the added hyperbole
I congratulated you on your Play and win last night. But did you even watch the game? How can you honestly say "This was never in doubt". The game was tied after 3, tied after 5 minutes of OT (with 2 minutes of it a Jets 4 on 3 PP, where they didn't score), and went to the 3rd round of the Shootout before there was a winner.
How can you possibly say that the outcome was never in doubt??
And it's great you have confidence in your Plays, but please don't title your Thread for a game between the 2 last place teams in the Western Conference playing a game in the middle of February-
"The Game of the Year"
0
Quote Originally Posted by Hog_Wild:
Hey SportsRefund,
I'm not trying to start anything, and personally, could care less if you want to list "Play of the Year"
However, there are people that will come here and blindly tail people, and buy into the hype with hard earned money at risk.
Why can't you just state your Plays w/o the added hyperbole
I congratulated you on your Play and win last night. But did you even watch the game? How can you honestly say "This was never in doubt". The game was tied after 3, tied after 5 minutes of OT (with 2 minutes of it a Jets 4 on 3 PP, where they didn't score), and went to the 3rd round of the Shootout before there was a winner.
How can you possibly say that the outcome was never in doubt??
And it's great you have confidence in your Plays, but please don't title your Thread for a game between the 2 last place teams in the Western Conference playing a game in the middle of February-
Hog..if you know how to read a line this would have stood out to you. I don't know how long you have been gambling but the putrid jets on the road at a pk situation on Saturday night in the home of Connor Mcdavid---was an easy winner. WINNIPEG DOMINATED the entire game if you watched and could have easily won by a coupke goals..a coupke bad bounces and the game went to so..no matter how you slice it ..and from my experience it warranted the title ..if you don't like don't play it and don't respond. Maybe you should spend more time researching and complimenting cappers that win rather that tell people how to title their plays.
0
Hog..if you know how to read a line this would have stood out to you. I don't know how long you have been gambling but the putrid jets on the road at a pk situation on Saturday night in the home of Connor Mcdavid---was an easy winner. WINNIPEG DOMINATED the entire game if you watched and could have easily won by a coupke goals..a coupke bad bounces and the game went to so..no matter how you slice it ..and from my experience it warranted the title ..if you don't like don't play it and don't respond. Maybe you should spend more time researching and complimenting cappers that win rather that tell people how to title their plays.
Would you rather me pick a game of the year on the two best teams and lose my pick? Maybe some day you will come around and understand your stupid way of thinking.
0
Would you rather me pick a game of the year on the two best teams and lose my pick? Maybe some day you will come around and understand your stupid way of thinking.
. However, had Hendricks, Purcell, McDavid, Kassian, Pouliet, Gryba, and Korpikoski all either missed open nets, or great breakawy and scoring opps in the 3rd, the Oilers would have won in Reg, and this game wouldn't have seen OT. Then there were missed opps by BOTH teams in OT that should've ended the game.
Again, you won, and congrats, but cut with the drama of this "Game of the Year" that you told people to Hammer the Jets
.
Established in 1995,
though
Hot Forum Topics
