I have a much better play on this over. TAke over 6 in reg. Not expecting a 3-3 tie if it lands 4-2 avs u push and don't lose. I also have it at 6 -120 not a bad line. Take it this way much easier and 1/2 puck less. I'm here to help everybody out.
.
1
I have a much better play on this over. TAke over 6 in reg. Not expecting a 3-3 tie if it lands 4-2 avs u push and don't lose. I also have it at 6 -120 not a bad line. Take it this way much easier and 1/2 puck less. I'm here to help everybody out.
Quote Originally Posted by HabsHater88: Rookie Goalie might let in 4 ... or, stand on his head, again. Better than expected, so far. Return of Hughes really helps Vancouver. Perhaps 3-1, either way.
youre talking about 2 different games here I think man.
0
Quote Originally Posted by gmcsports:
Quote Originally Posted by HabsHater88: Rookie Goalie might let in 4 ... or, stand on his head, again. Better than expected, so far. Return of Hughes really helps Vancouver. Perhaps 3-1, either way.
youre talking about 2 different games here I think man.
I can write pages on why this Over is as easy as they come but at the end of the day we all just want to make money and not read. Take the OVER 6.5 in the Avalanche ?? Blackhawks game let me know if you tail and best of luck to all.
Any more great totals you want to share going forward?
0
Quote Originally Posted by ParlayGuru1:
I can write pages on why this Over is as easy as they come but at the end of the day we all just want to make money and not read. Take the OVER 6.5 in the Avalanche ?? Blackhawks game let me know if you tail and best of luck to all.
Any more great totals you want to share going forward?
Quote Originally Posted by gmcsports: Quote Originally Posted by HabsHater88: Rookie Goalie might let in 4 ... or, stand on his head, again. Better than expected, so far. Return of Hughes really helps Vancouver. Perhaps 3-1, either way. youre talking about 2 different games here I think man.
Thank you for pointing out this error.
Apolgies for the unintentional confusion created.
Problem was ... UNDER 6 in (Lankinen) van/WAS, and UNDER 6.5 in (Miner) col/CHI each was the correct side to be on, according to the numbers involved.
Moving forward, will do better to not conflate the different but similar narratives.
0
Quote Originally Posted by triplee2385:
Quote Originally Posted by gmcsports: Quote Originally Posted by HabsHater88: Rookie Goalie might let in 4 ... or, stand on his head, again. Better than expected, so far. Return of Hughes really helps Vancouver. Perhaps 3-1, either way. youre talking about 2 different games here I think man.
Thank you for pointing out this error.
Apolgies for the unintentional confusion created.
Problem was ... UNDER 6 in (Lankinen) van/WAS, and UNDER 6.5 in (Miner) col/CHI each was the correct side to be on, according to the numbers involved.
Moving forward, will do better to not conflate the different but similar narratives.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
