These are money / wise guys plays that I have charted for more than 3 months...hit rate is outrageously high...I will do my best to post them ASAP and as early as possible, but we need to wait until the line closes at game start...I have been "handicappin" for a LONG time (40 years). Never seen anything even close to the hit rate on it (HUNDREDS OF PLAYS IN HISTORY SO FAR)...reason I am here is to document 2 weeks of plays as best I can...then find someone(s) who want to pay for it (ALLOT$$$$) but ALL plays posted here are completely verifiable by using one particular website numbers and a simple formula. In process of copyright and TM applications. Stay tuned guys there's $$$$ in them thar hills....
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
These are money / wise guys plays that I have charted for more than 3 months...hit rate is outrageously high...I will do my best to post them ASAP and as early as possible, but we need to wait until the line closes at game start...I have been "handicappin" for a LONG time (40 years). Never seen anything even close to the hit rate on it (HUNDREDS OF PLAYS IN HISTORY SO FAR)...reason I am here is to document 2 weeks of plays as best I can...then find someone(s) who want to pay for it (ALLOT$$$$) but ALL plays posted here are completely verifiable by using one particular website numbers and a simple formula. In process of copyright and TM applications. Stay tuned guys there's $$$$ in them thar hills....
Here are results from last 2 weeks (from todays date)... COMPLETELY verifiable...includes NFL, NCAAF, NBA, NHL plays.
Looks like NCAAF has the lowest hit rate. I believe that is due to the daily $$$$ wagered is spread much more thinly on those days with a huge slate of games. Will update that ASAP. Plus there are a few heavy ML plays in NHL and MLB that won but I have no long term data to prove profitability or not (yet).
10/11. 1-0
10/12. 4-4-1
10/13. 5-0
10/14. 2-0
10/15. 1-0
10/16. 1-0
10/17. 3-0
10/18. 2-0
10/19. 4-7
10/20. 2-3
10/21. 1-0
10/22. 3-1
10/23. 2-0
10/24. 1-0
Total for last 14 DAYS = 32-15-1
These were all done without one other "filter" that I am looking at to get even a higher hit rate - especially for CFB. And it IS possible...
Not including the PUSH, the hit rate is 68%.
0
Here are results from last 2 weeks (from todays date)... COMPLETELY verifiable...includes NFL, NCAAF, NBA, NHL plays.
Looks like NCAAF has the lowest hit rate. I believe that is due to the daily $$$$ wagered is spread much more thinly on those days with a huge slate of games. Will update that ASAP. Plus there are a few heavy ML plays in NHL and MLB that won but I have no long term data to prove profitability or not (yet).
10/11. 1-0
10/12. 4-4-1
10/13. 5-0
10/14. 2-0
10/15. 1-0
10/16. 1-0
10/17. 3-0
10/18. 2-0
10/19. 4-7
10/20. 2-3
10/21. 1-0
10/22. 3-1
10/23. 2-0
10/24. 1-0
Total for last 14 DAYS = 32-15-1
These were all done without one other "filter" that I am looking at to get even a higher hit rate - especially for CFB. And it IS possible...
I think I will post all plays in the NBA thread due to them playing nearly every day..otherwise I will need to spend to much time shuffling back and forth on a busy day/night
0
I think I will post all plays in the NBA thread due to them playing nearly every day..otherwise I will need to spend to much time shuffling back and forth on a busy day/night
If you actually read my first post with comprehension instead or reading between the lines - I am not asking anyone here for anything... I am not here to sell picks...PERIOD... and IF what I am saying is true, then only someone carrying a black AMEX card can afford what its worth. Somehow I don't think that would be you.
After a couple of weeks of nearly 70% winners, I will just say "you're welcome". It's not ME making the picks.. its the BIG $$$...
2-0 tonight... nice start...and I will not count them due to my post being between flights on my way home and well after the games started.
14 wagering days left...maybe you should fade them...your bookie will thank you.
0
@dyamarik
@osubucks1
If you actually read my first post with comprehension instead or reading between the lines - I am not asking anyone here for anything... I am not here to sell picks...PERIOD... and IF what I am saying is true, then only someone carrying a black AMEX card can afford what its worth. Somehow I don't think that would be you.
After a couple of weeks of nearly 70% winners, I will just say "you're welcome". It's not ME making the picks.. its the BIG $$$...
2-0 tonight... nice start...and I will not count them due to my post being between flights on my way home and well after the games started.
14 wagering days left...maybe you should fade them...your bookie will thank you.
Have been in flight = missed two plays now in progress. NBA Orlando -11.5 Grizz/Rockets OVER 226 Dont have to count em if you don't want...
why would anyone “count” these as wins..lol
when you posted these plays, 1 game was over with and the total was wayyyy above pace at the time and it would have taken a miracle not to actually hit
0
Quote Originally Posted by CoachDaniel:
Have been in flight = missed two plays now in progress. NBA Orlando -11.5 Grizz/Rockets OVER 226 Dont have to count em if you don't want...
why would anyone “count” these as wins..lol
when you posted these plays, 1 game was over with and the total was wayyyy above pace at the time and it would have taken a miracle not to actually hit
I know you were not asking anyone for anything, but you sound like a Tout, and a liar. Your second post says "completely verifiable". So I checked your posts from this year here on Covers. There aren't any.
So there is no "verifiable evidence" of this fantastic record.
And you state you have "Wise Guy" insider info... Which is also completely unverifiable.
And you have never posted in the NHL Forum.
Why would I not think you are nothing but an attention whoring blowhard?
Good luck to you - I won't post in your threads anymore, just stop spewing your nonsense, and post plays like the rest of us without all the drama.
0
@CoachDaniel
I know you were not asking anyone for anything, but you sound like a Tout, and a liar. Your second post says "completely verifiable". So I checked your posts from this year here on Covers. There aren't any.
So there is no "verifiable evidence" of this fantastic record.
And you state you have "Wise Guy" insider info... Which is also completely unverifiable.
And you have never posted in the NHL Forum.
Why would I not think you are nothing but an attention whoring blowhard?
Good luck to you - I won't post in your threads anymore, just stop spewing your nonsense, and post plays like the rest of us without all the drama.
You can post or not on this thread. I am actually happy to interact. Would prefer it to be without the name calling but I understand the FU mindset and skepticism. However, the infantile name calling says more about you than me.
I just updated my spreadsheet...COMPLETELY VERIFIABLE using the website I get my numbers from.. I didn't say verifiable on THIS website...and yes I consider insider money...if I showed you what and how I look at it you would probably agree.
I will be happy to send you my spreadsheet for the last two weeks. Actually I will send it to anyone. I usually don't use the spreadsheet any more because its easier and more time efficient to eyeball the games and make the plays quickly at post time. And as I mentioned in previous post, I was looking for another filter for higher hit rate, and last night found one. I use prime numbers, fib retracement, scoring/spread and scoring/spread differentials as criteria. The end result is a simple, VERIFIABLE, elegant formulae that KICKS BUTT.
You want verifiable evidence... ASK FOR IT
Never said I posted anything in NHL forum. Or any other thread for that matter.
Before this year I rarely if ever bet NHL or MLB... mostly playoffs if ever.
I don't know what the NHL record is yet.. sample size is small.
All I know is that all sports combined, NBA, NFL, CFB, NHL sits at right around 70%. A RIDICULOUS hit rate, at somewhere just about -112 to -115 avg juice. And I am NOT DONE YET. There are a couple of plays I need to add just to keep the books from skewing spreads and juice.
@dyamarik
I am about as no-nonsense as you will find.
Ask for the spreadsheet = then call me all the names you want...
0
You can post or not on this thread. I am actually happy to interact. Would prefer it to be without the name calling but I understand the FU mindset and skepticism. However, the infantile name calling says more about you than me.
I just updated my spreadsheet...COMPLETELY VERIFIABLE using the website I get my numbers from.. I didn't say verifiable on THIS website...and yes I consider insider money...if I showed you what and how I look at it you would probably agree.
I will be happy to send you my spreadsheet for the last two weeks. Actually I will send it to anyone. I usually don't use the spreadsheet any more because its easier and more time efficient to eyeball the games and make the plays quickly at post time. And as I mentioned in previous post, I was looking for another filter for higher hit rate, and last night found one. I use prime numbers, fib retracement, scoring/spread and scoring/spread differentials as criteria. The end result is a simple, VERIFIABLE, elegant formulae that KICKS BUTT.
You want verifiable evidence... ASK FOR IT
Never said I posted anything in NHL forum. Or any other thread for that matter.
Before this year I rarely if ever bet NHL or MLB... mostly playoffs if ever.
I don't know what the NHL record is yet.. sample size is small.
All I know is that all sports combined, NBA, NFL, CFB, NHL sits at right around 70%. A RIDICULOUS hit rate, at somewhere just about -112 to -115 avg juice. And I am NOT DONE YET. There are a couple of plays I need to add just to keep the books from skewing spreads and juice.
@dyamarik
I am about as no-nonsense as you will find.
Ask for the spreadsheet = then call me all the names you want...
You are right... don't count them!!!!!! When I posted them orlando was up 11 pts. but game was far from over, in fact was not decided until inside last 25 seconds or so... it was almost a back door cover the other way, looked to me like they played that game according to beating the spread or not. and the totals was not obtainable at the number either...as they were a bit over in 3rd period.
The numbers I look at in my formulae are after the books close their static spread/totals/moneyline at tip off. So you could check those at any time.. even right now.
I just happened to be on a plane when that happened last night.
On to a couple of weeks of profits here guys...its really that good..
0
@osubucks1
You are right... don't count them!!!!!! When I posted them orlando was up 11 pts. but game was far from over, in fact was not decided until inside last 25 seconds or so... it was almost a back door cover the other way, looked to me like they played that game according to beating the spread or not. and the totals was not obtainable at the number either...as they were a bit over in 3rd period.
The numbers I look at in my formulae are after the books close their static spread/totals/moneyline at tip off. So you could check those at any time.. even right now.
I just happened to be on a plane when that happened last night.
On to a couple of weeks of profits here guys...its really that good..
Never said i POSTED anywhere... If you want my spreadsheet for the last two weeks... I will send it... but if you want the formulae and the website i use for them, that is a different story...
Or just forget about the record. consider it bogus. It's all a lie until proven otherwise yes? A conspiracy theory.
Let me ask you...if you had a round about 70% hit rate and someone wanted to look at the method you discovered after days, weeks, months, years, and a few decades of work... would you just give it away? The information is worth alot to some... my time is worth a fortune to me.
If you want evidence of publicly posted plays I get it... I don't have them... and the extra time and effort it takes to post them is not worth it to me in the long run... extra websites, forums ... for what? I am busy betting the plays myself and then watching the games...I am posting here to MAKE a public record, then decide what exactly if anything, I will do with it...Im not interested in the least about selling the picks as a tout. So its either just making the plays myself and sharing with a couple of friends, or selling the method...and if it performs as I know it does... it is worth ALOT of money to someone.
0
@mrod112
Never said i POSTED anywhere... If you want my spreadsheet for the last two weeks... I will send it... but if you want the formulae and the website i use for them, that is a different story...
Or just forget about the record. consider it bogus. It's all a lie until proven otherwise yes? A conspiracy theory.
Let me ask you...if you had a round about 70% hit rate and someone wanted to look at the method you discovered after days, weeks, months, years, and a few decades of work... would you just give it away? The information is worth alot to some... my time is worth a fortune to me.
If you want evidence of publicly posted plays I get it... I don't have them... and the extra time and effort it takes to post them is not worth it to me in the long run... extra websites, forums ... for what? I am busy betting the plays myself and then watching the games...I am posting here to MAKE a public record, then decide what exactly if anything, I will do with it...Im not interested in the least about selling the picks as a tout. So its either just making the plays myself and sharing with a couple of friends, or selling the method...and if it performs as I know it does... it is worth ALOT of money to someone.
I will post all the plays in the NBA thread by the same name since there are games nearly every day. Screwed up last night and posted in NHL I believe...
0
@mrod112
I will post all the plays in the NBA thread by the same name since there are games nearly every day. Screwed up last night and posted in NHL I believe...
Coach, I will be looking forward to the picks in NBA forum …. Just post your plays when you feel like you want to and the record will speak for itself to everyone
0
Coach, I will be looking forward to the picks in NBA forum …. Just post your plays when you feel like you want to and the record will speak for itself to everyone
MONITOR NBA THREAD (SAME NAME) FOR ALL LEAGUE PLAYS
DAY 3 OF 14 WAGERING DAYS
START BANK = $5000. TODAYS BANK = $5586.
TODAYS WAGERS = $200 FLAT (4% OF BANK) normally I would use 2% but hit overall hit rate hovers between 68-72% so I am a bit more aggressive.
(increases or decreases in wagers is triggered after a profit or loss of 20% of bank - todays bank shows a profit of less than 20% from original $5k. Thus 4% of START BANK = $200
W/L = 5-1
ROI = 54.51%
Let's get a couple tonight....
0
MONITOR NBA THREAD (SAME NAME) FOR ALL LEAGUE PLAYS
DAY 3 OF 14 WAGERING DAYS
START BANK = $5000. TODAYS BANK = $5586.
TODAYS WAGERS = $200 FLAT (4% OF BANK) normally I would use 2% but hit overall hit rate hovers between 68-72% so I am a bit more aggressive.
(increases or decreases in wagers is triggered after a profit or loss of 20% of bank - todays bank shows a profit of less than 20% from original $5k. Thus 4% of START BANK = $200
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.