damn i should of taken the pens ml but i didn't want to lay out that much juice
I'm on the fence about the wings/hawks game. Both teams have been less then impressive of late so I'll prob lay off that game but any insight you guys have on the game would be great.So I'm taking:
ducks ml in regulation (2 unit play)
goodluck everyone
let me know what you guys think
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
2-0 yesterday +2.00 units
88-58 overall +18.18 units
damn i should of taken the pens ml but i didn't want to lay out that much juice
I'm on the fence about the wings/hawks game. Both teams have been less then impressive of late so I'll prob lay off that game but any insight you guys have on the game would be great.So I'm taking:
With Howard out tomorrow was thinking Hawks initially. However, looked at it again and my lean is with the Wings.
It may be a high scoring game with the back up in here. I figure both teams will get alot of shots on net. So, depends on how well the goalies handle the pressure. If they do then low scoring ,,maybe
Wings are probably getting Franzen back. So, more scoring punch on the Wings side a plus. Bertuzzi back helps.
Maybe line will drop tomorrow as peeps take Hawks cause no Jimmy.
Just a lean at this point but looks good
0
With Howard out tomorrow was thinking Hawks initially. However, looked at it again and my lean is with the Wings.
It may be a high scoring game with the back up in here. I figure both teams will get alot of shots on net. So, depends on how well the goalies handle the pressure. If they do then low scoring ,,maybe
Wings are probably getting Franzen back. So, more scoring punch on the Wings side a plus. Bertuzzi back helps.
Maybe line will drop tomorrow as peeps take Hawks cause no Jimmy.
With Howard out tomorrow was thinking Hawks initially. However, looked at it again and my lean is with the Wings.
It may be a high scoring game with the back up in here. I figure both teams will get alot of shots on net. So, depends on how well the goalies handle the pressure. If they do then low scoring ,,maybe
Wings are probably getting Franzen back. So, more scoring punch on the Wings side a plus. Bertuzzi back helps.
Maybe line will drop tomorrow as peeps take Hawks cause no Jimmy.
Just a lean at this point but looks good
thanks mixel I like the wings as well and MacDonald has been pretty solid backing up Howard and your right, Franzen will bring some more offense. The only thing thats holding me back is that Crawford will get the start tomorrow for the hawks and he's owned detroit with a 2-0-0 record with a 1.00 GAA and .970 SV% over two starts against the Red Wings this season.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mixelpic:
With Howard out tomorrow was thinking Hawks initially. However, looked at it again and my lean is with the Wings.
It may be a high scoring game with the back up in here. I figure both teams will get alot of shots on net. So, depends on how well the goalies handle the pressure. If they do then low scoring ,,maybe
Wings are probably getting Franzen back. So, more scoring punch on the Wings side a plus. Bertuzzi back helps.
Maybe line will drop tomorrow as peeps take Hawks cause no Jimmy.
Just a lean at this point but looks good
thanks mixel I like the wings as well and MacDonald has been pretty solid backing up Howard and your right, Franzen will bring some more offense. The only thing thats holding me back is that Crawford will get the start tomorrow for the hawks and he's owned detroit with a 2-0-0 record with a 1.00 GAA and .970 SV% over two starts against the Red Wings this season.
thanks mixel I like the wings as well and MacDonald has been pretty solid backing up Howard and your right, Franzen will bring some more offense. The only thing thats holding me back is that Crawford will get the start tomorrow for the hawks and he's owned detroit with a 2-0-0 record with a 1.00 GAA and .970 SV% over two starts against the Red Wings this season.
I hear ya, Crawford will have to play that way once more..?? Can you see him shutting the door a third time?...... maybe?
Can you see a 1-0 for Hawks? I don't know..low probability..i'd say.
This will be a good game. Hawks a bit pissed about screw up to ducks the other night. But, will that be enough to motivate em to win here.
Alot to consider,,I know.
Wings still the better team this year, so Hawks will be in tough in this game..i'd say.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TickleUrPickle:
thanks mixel I like the wings as well and MacDonald has been pretty solid backing up Howard and your right, Franzen will bring some more offense. The only thing thats holding me back is that Crawford will get the start tomorrow for the hawks and he's owned detroit with a 2-0-0 record with a 1.00 GAA and .970 SV% over two starts against the Red Wings this season.
I hear ya, Crawford will have to play that way once more..?? Can you see him shutting the door a third time?...... maybe?
Can you see a 1-0 for Hawks? I don't know..low probability..i'd say.
This will be a good game. Hawks a bit pissed about screw up to ducks the other night. But, will that be enough to motivate em to win here.
Alot to consider,,I know.
Wings still the better team this year, so Hawks will be in tough in this game..i'd say.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.