So I've done some research into this and thought it was quite intriguing.. I've seen HappyKane post a lot in the MLB forum.. He posts biorhythms based on players birthdates and gives the players a rating for each day.. This includes A) Physical B) Emotional C) Intellectual
Now I know what some people think - it's not true.. Well you could be wrong.. I've seen a lot of things happen.. Though a good rating does not mean they will perform good ALWAYS.. But I've done some testing and some of it actually works..
I've made up a spreadsheet that tracks rhythms.. I've calculated all three rhythms into one number.. This number is between 100% and -100% and 0 being the middle.. This is a number I've formulated from all three rhythms..
Again, this isn't all necesarily true and I don't always believe it to be.. But I definitely think that some of it is true..
I'm a big Canucks fan and last game I told my buddy 'keep an eye on Bieksa..' Sure enough he has a great game.. I also said that the Sedins would have a breakout game.. And they did.. So ya you just never know..
Here are the spreadsheets for the Canucks and Sharks.. Have a look, keep an eye out.. I'm still testing and PLEASE do not go off this and PLEASE do not tell me I'm wrong if someone has a good game and a bad rating..! Also remember that everyone has a different skill set, more playing time, etc.. Therefore don't go off a 4th liner or a backup goalie.. Infact like I said don't go off anything! This is purely testing!! Cheers!
So I've done some research into this and thought it was quite intriguing.. I've seen HappyKane post a lot in the MLB forum.. He posts biorhythms based on players birthdates and gives the players a rating for each day.. This includes A) Physical B) Emotional C) Intellectual
Now I know what some people think - it's not true.. Well you could be wrong.. I've seen a lot of things happen.. Though a good rating does not mean they will perform good ALWAYS.. But I've done some testing and some of it actually works..
I've made up a spreadsheet that tracks rhythms.. I've calculated all three rhythms into one number.. This number is between 100% and -100% and 0 being the middle.. This is a number I've formulated from all three rhythms..
Again, this isn't all necesarily true and I don't always believe it to be.. But I definitely think that some of it is true..
I'm a big Canucks fan and last game I told my buddy 'keep an eye on Bieksa..' Sure enough he has a great game.. I also said that the Sedins would have a breakout game.. And they did.. So ya you just never know..
Here are the spreadsheets for the Canucks and Sharks.. Have a look, keep an eye out.. I'm still testing and PLEASE do not go off this and PLEASE do not tell me I'm wrong if someone has a good game and a bad rating..! Also remember that everyone has a different skill set, more playing time, etc.. Therefore don't go off a 4th liner or a backup goalie.. Infact like I said don't go off anything! This is purely testing!! Cheers!
PS - I've colored the sections where players are HOT and COLD.. In order from Hottest to Coldest it is - YELLOW, RED, ORANGE, LIGHT BLUE, TEAL, DARK BLUE..
Yellow being a player where he is at his best..
Dark Blue being at his worst..
0
PS - I've colored the sections where players are HOT and COLD.. In order from Hottest to Coldest it is - YELLOW, RED, ORANGE, LIGHT BLUE, TEAL, DARK BLUE..
Do you use the sidereal system or the tropical? I'd use the sidereal since it's based on the actual placements/movements of the planets, hence it's more accurate.
And I've seen the science that supports the idea that the movement of the planets actually do have direct influences upon people, so I do take this kind of information seriously... as long as it's sidereal-based, and not tropical-based.
The sidereal system is far better, imo.
0
Lines --
Nice!
Do you use the sidereal system or the tropical? I'd use the sidereal since it's based on the actual placements/movements of the planets, hence it's more accurate.
And I've seen the science that supports the idea that the movement of the planets actually do have direct influences upon people, so I do take this kind of information seriously... as long as it's sidereal-based, and not tropical-based.
Do you use the sidereal system or the tropical? I'd use the sidereal since it's based on the actual placements/movements of the planets, hence it's more accurate.
And I've seen the science that supports the idea that the movement of the planets actually do have direct influences upon people, so I do take this kind of information seriously... as long as it's sidereal-based, and not tropical-based.
The sidereal system is far better, imo.
To be honest I'm not sure it uses either.. It uses date of birth and uses three cycles: a 23-day "physical" cycle, a 28-day "emotional" cycle, and a 33-day "intellectual" cycle.. Not sure what that's called.. (PS - I copy/pasted that from Wiki! lol)
Thanks anyhow..
OnlyGod - hey there is only one game a day, I got time to dig deep lol..
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mozart:
Lines --
Nice!
Do you use the sidereal system or the tropical? I'd use the sidereal since it's based on the actual placements/movements of the planets, hence it's more accurate.
And I've seen the science that supports the idea that the movement of the planets actually do have direct influences upon people, so I do take this kind of information seriously... as long as it's sidereal-based, and not tropical-based.
The sidereal system is far better, imo.
To be honest I'm not sure it uses either.. It uses date of birth and uses three cycles: a 23-day "physical" cycle, a 28-day "emotional" cycle, and a 33-day "intellectual" cycle.. Not sure what that's called.. (PS - I copy/pasted that from Wiki! lol)
Thanks anyhow..
OnlyGod - hey there is only one game a day, I got time to dig deep lol..
To be honest I'm not sure it uses either.. It uses date of birth and uses three cycles: a 23-day "physical" cycle, a 28-day "emotional" cycle, and a 33-day "intellectual" cycle.. Not sure what that's called.. (PS - I copy/pasted that from Wiki! lol)
Thanks anyhow..
OnlyGod - hey there is only one game a day, I got time to dig deep lol..
Hey gotta be open minded I have won some stupid bets based on this kind of thing before.
0
Quote Originally Posted by WeMoveLines:
To be honest I'm not sure it uses either.. It uses date of birth and uses three cycles: a 23-day "physical" cycle, a 28-day "emotional" cycle, and a 33-day "intellectual" cycle.. Not sure what that's called.. (PS - I copy/pasted that from Wiki! lol)
Thanks anyhow..
OnlyGod - hey there is only one game a day, I got time to dig deep lol..
Hey gotta be open minded I have won some stupid bets based on this kind of thing before.
- Look for Bieksa to have another strong performance as well as Alex Edler
- On SJ back end Murray and Vlasic should have strong performances
- SJ first line should do most of the damage - 2nd line is in a downfall - in particular Dany Heatley (maybe the media will be talking about him instead of Marleau after game 2 or 3)
- Canucks 1st and 2nd lines are in even trends (not too much happening at the moment) We saw the Kesler drop off last game - downward bio trend? Hope not!
- Like I said I don't put much theory into 3rd and 4th liners but Hodgson has been playing well and could possibly have a break out game..
Guess we'll see after this game if experiment #1 worked
0
Game #2 Predictions (using the charts)
- Look for Bieksa to have another strong performance as well as Alex Edler
- On SJ back end Murray and Vlasic should have strong performances
- SJ first line should do most of the damage - 2nd line is in a downfall - in particular Dany Heatley (maybe the media will be talking about him instead of Marleau after game 2 or 3)
- Canucks 1st and 2nd lines are in even trends (not too much happening at the moment) We saw the Kesler drop off last game - downward bio trend? Hope not!
- Like I said I don't put much theory into 3rd and 4th liners but Hodgson has been playing well and could possibly have a break out game..
Guess we'll see after this game if experiment #1 worked
PS - I've colored the sections where players are HOT and COLD.. In order from Hottest to Coldest it is - YELLOW, RED, ORANGE, LIGHT BLUE, TEAL, DARK BLUE..
Yellow being a player where he is at his best..
Dark Blue being at his worst..
Explains why that is a Maple Leafs team color
0
Quote Originally Posted by WeMoveLines:
PS - I've colored the sections where players are HOT and COLD.. In order from Hottest to Coldest it is - YELLOW, RED, ORANGE, LIGHT BLUE, TEAL, DARK BLUE..
in japan they use biorythms as a science. pilots are not allowed to fly when 2 or more biorythm readings are a 0 which is the critical point. when the biorythm is at 0 for physical injuries occur 0 for intellectual they say ppl should not sign any contracts or do things requiring extra thinking 0 for emotional is often when a woman has pms
older ppl die more often when 2 or more lines are at critical
0
in japan they use biorythms as a science. pilots are not allowed to fly when 2 or more biorythm readings are a 0 which is the critical point. when the biorythm is at 0 for physical injuries occur 0 for intellectual they say ppl should not sign any contracts or do things requiring extra thinking 0 for emotional is often when a woman has pms
older ppl die more often when 2 or more lines are at critical
- Look for Bieksa to have another strong performance as well as Alex Edler
- On SJ back end Murray and Vlasic should have strong performances
- SJ first line should do most of the damage - 2nd line is in a downfall - in particular Dany Heatley (maybe the media will be talking about him instead of Marleau after game 2 or 3)
- Canucks 1st and 2nd lines are in even trends (not too much happening at the moment) We saw the Kesler drop off last game - downward bio trend? Hope not!
- Like I said I don't put much theory into 3rd and 4th liners but Hodgson has been playing well and could possibly have a break out game..
Guess we'll see after this game if experiment #1 worked
After watching the game looks like that was a pretty bang on prediction..
Bieksa has an awesome game
Murray had a solid game before it all got outta hand..
Heatley basically a no show..
I thought Hodgson played good - got robbed outta 2 goals..
..
0
Quote Originally Posted by WeMoveLines:
Game #2 Predictions (using the charts)
- Look for Bieksa to have another strong performance as well as Alex Edler
- On SJ back end Murray and Vlasic should have strong performances
- SJ first line should do most of the damage - 2nd line is in a downfall - in particular Dany Heatley (maybe the media will be talking about him instead of Marleau after game 2 or 3)
- Canucks 1st and 2nd lines are in even trends (not too much happening at the moment) We saw the Kesler drop off last game - downward bio trend? Hope not!
- Like I said I don't put much theory into 3rd and 4th liners but Hodgson has been playing well and could possibly have a break out game..
Guess we'll see after this game if experiment #1 worked
After watching the game looks like that was a pretty bang on prediction..
Bieksa has an awesome game
Murray had a solid game before it all got outta hand..
Heatley basically a no show..
I thought Hodgson played good - got robbed outta 2 goals..
Cool stuff. I was thinking about this post during the game. I've followed HappyKane's posts for awhile, be it NHL/MLB/NFL, and the dude always seems to be in the green.
Nice job tonight, it's a different approach and I like it. BTW, where are you in BC? Prince George here
0
Cool stuff. I was thinking about this post during the game. I've followed HappyKane's posts for awhile, be it NHL/MLB/NFL, and the dude always seems to be in the green.
Nice job tonight, it's a different approach and I like it. BTW, where are you in BC? Prince George here
Cool stuff. I was thinking about this post during the game. I've followed HappyKane's posts for awhile, be it NHL/MLB/NFL, and the dude always seems to be in the green.
Nice job tonight, it's a different approach and I like it. BTW, where are you in BC? Prince George here
Not far away.. Mackenzie.. lol.
0
Quote Originally Posted by ctm1985:
Cool stuff. I was thinking about this post during the game. I've followed HappyKane's posts for awhile, be it NHL/MLB/NFL, and the dude always seems to be in the green.
Nice job tonight, it's a different approach and I like it. BTW, where are you in BC? Prince George here
- I look for the Lecavalier, St. Louis, Purcell line to get some points tonight.. Stamkos line trending downwards..
- Hedman should have a solid game tonight..
- Roloson got pulled last game in favor of Mike Smith.. Though it wasn't all his fault his rhythm is in a downward trend so I will be looking to see if he has an 'average' game tonight..
Boston Predictions
- Not too much happening for Boston players tonight - but I look for the 1st line to get it done again - Lucic should have a solid game..
- 1st D pairing Chara/Seidenberg should be good tonight.. Seidenberg should have a good game..
- I don't expect Seguin to contribute as much tonight - tho he must have a lot of confidence after last game so that should help him..
My pick/prediction - Boston 4-2
0
Tampa Predictions
- I look for the Lecavalier, St. Louis, Purcell line to get some points tonight.. Stamkos line trending downwards..
- Hedman should have a solid game tonight..
- Roloson got pulled last game in favor of Mike Smith.. Though it wasn't all his fault his rhythm is in a downward trend so I will be looking to see if he has an 'average' game tonight..
Boston Predictions
- Not too much happening for Boston players tonight - but I look for the 1st line to get it done again - Lucic should have a solid game..
- 1st D pairing Chara/Seidenberg should be good tonight.. Seidenberg should have a good game..
- I don't expect Seguin to contribute as much tonight - tho he must have a lot of confidence after last game so that should help him..
After watching the game looks like that was a pretty bang on prediction..
Bieksa has an awesome game
Murray had a solid game before it all got outta hand..
Heatley basically a no show..
I thought Hodgson played good - got robbed outta 2 goals..
..
actually in review murray was actually the guy that cost sharks the game winning goal. murray was supposed to be on the left side when bieksa was sent on a breakaway for the winning goal on the side murray was supposed to defend.
btw that was a set play- van had 4 skaters on the ice while higgins sat on the boards when van broke out coach v told him to skate in take the pass and hit bieksa on the streak
0
Quote Originally Posted by WeMoveLines:
After watching the game looks like that was a pretty bang on prediction..
Bieksa has an awesome game
Murray had a solid game before it all got outta hand..
Heatley basically a no show..
I thought Hodgson played good - got robbed outta 2 goals..
..
actually in review murray was actually the guy that cost sharks the game winning goal. murray was supposed to be on the left side when bieksa was sent on a breakaway for the winning goal on the side murray was supposed to defend.
btw that was a set play- van had 4 skaters on the ice while higgins sat on the boards when van broke out coach v told him to skate in take the pass and hit bieksa on the streak
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.