I would have been at least a little impressed if you called this three games ago. Anyone that knows this team , and hockey, at all seen this coming back then.
0
I would have been at least a little impressed if you called this three games ago. Anyone that knows this team , and hockey, at all seen this coming back then.
I would have been at least a little impressed if you called this three games ago. Anyone that knows this team , and hockey, at all seen this coming back then.
Ya Kings on their annual traditional "streak to squeek" into the playoffs end of the season run. couple tough ones coming with @ Wild and @ Blackhawks but after those good chance they "run the table" last 6. depending what Flames and Canucks do they could get as high as 2nd in Pacific
0
Quote Originally Posted by UndertakerNS:
I would have been at least a little impressed if you called this three games ago. Anyone that knows this team , and hockey, at all seen this coming back then.
Ya Kings on their annual traditional "streak to squeek" into the playoffs end of the season run. couple tough ones coming with @ Wild and @ Blackhawks but after those good chance they "run the table" last 6. depending what Flames and Canucks do they could get as high as 2nd in Pacific
I would have been at least a little impressed if you called this three games ago. Anyone that knows this team , and hockey, at all seen this coming back then.
The kings are a dam good hockey team, but this is not their year. Quick has issues, the team lost faith in him, and he is playing very nervous. If I was coach I'd go with Jones tonight. With quick in net, new jersey wins this hockey game.
So what you really meant when you said this on Monday is that it might still be their year and they will beat new jersey with quick in net?
The lion and the tiger may be more powerful, but the wolf doesn't perform in the circus.
0
Quote Originally Posted by UndertakerNS:
I would have been at least a little impressed if you called this three games ago. Anyone that knows this team , and hockey, at all seen this coming back then.
The kings are a dam good hockey team, but this is not their year. Quick has issues, the team lost faith in him, and he is playing very nervous. If I was coach I'd go with Jones tonight. With quick in net, new jersey wins this hockey game.
So what you really meant when you said this on Monday is that it might still be their year and they will beat new jersey with quick in net?
The kings are a dam good hockey team, but this is not their year. Quick has issues, the team lost faith in him, and he is playing very nervous. If I was coach I'd go with Jones tonight. With quick in net, new jersey wins this hockey game.
So what you really meant when you said this on Monday is that it might still be their year and they will beat new jersey with quick in net?
0
Quote Originally Posted by Polar_Bear:
The kings are a dam good hockey team, but this is not their year. Quick has issues, the team lost faith in him, and he is playing very nervous. If I was coach I'd go with Jones tonight. With quick in net, new jersey wins this hockey game.
So what you really meant when you said this on Monday is that it might still be their year and they will beat new jersey with quick in net?
The kings are a dam good hockey team, but this is not their year. Quick has issues, the team lost faith in him, and he is playing very nervous. If I was coach I'd go with Jones tonight. With quick in net, new jersey wins this hockey game.
So what you really meant when you said this on Monday is that it might still be their year and they will beat new jersey with quick in net?
I ment they are having a poorer then normal year for their standards, and that quick wasn't playing like himself, and that they should give him a break, and that if they didn't they would lose one hockey game. A team can have a bad year, including their goalie, and still hold their reputable resilient traits they are known for and squeek into the playoffs, despite losing one game or despite giving their starting goalie a break for a game.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Polar_Bear:
The kings are a dam good hockey team, but this is not their year. Quick has issues, the team lost faith in him, and he is playing very nervous. If I was coach I'd go with Jones tonight. With quick in net, new jersey wins this hockey game.
So what you really meant when you said this on Monday is that it might still be their year and they will beat new jersey with quick in net?
I ment they are having a poorer then normal year for their standards, and that quick wasn't playing like himself, and that they should give him a break, and that if they didn't they would lose one hockey game. A team can have a bad year, including their goalie, and still hold their reputable resilient traits they are known for and squeek into the playoffs, despite losing one game or despite giving their starting goalie a break for a game.
The kings are a dam good hockey team, but this is not their year. Quick has issues, the team lost faith in him, and he is playing very nervous. If I was coach I'd go with Jones tonight. With quick in net, new jersey wins this hockey game.
So what you really meant when you said this on Monday is that it might still be their year and they will beat new jersey with quick in net?
I have read some dumb posts in my 7 years on this site but this one takes the cake, by far. Long time Kings fan (over 30 years) and I have never seen a better clutch goalie than Quick. Playing nervous? He has surrender more than 2 goals only once in the last 10 games (empty net goals do not factor in GA) and brought his save % down to 2.26. The team has lost faith in him and should start Martin Jones? Yes, that is why he started back to back games versus NJ and NYR, then started 2 days later in Long Island. You know nothing about about this team or its cohesion. Doughty, Kopitar, Brown, carter, gaborik, Muzzin, Quick all play as a team, with new a stellar new addition in Sekara, with Richards and Martinez back: Tanner Pearson due to return soon, as well. l Apparently, Polar Bear, all it takes to be a Hall of Famer on this site is to post idiotic statements like yours over and over again. You seriously summed up an absurd knowledge of hockey and bias in a few sentences, and showed just what a Fu(ktard you really are!
0
Quote Originally Posted by Polar_Bear:
The kings are a dam good hockey team, but this is not their year. Quick has issues, the team lost faith in him, and he is playing very nervous. If I was coach I'd go with Jones tonight. With quick in net, new jersey wins this hockey game.
So what you really meant when you said this on Monday is that it might still be their year and they will beat new jersey with quick in net?
I have read some dumb posts in my 7 years on this site but this one takes the cake, by far. Long time Kings fan (over 30 years) and I have never seen a better clutch goalie than Quick. Playing nervous? He has surrender more than 2 goals only once in the last 10 games (empty net goals do not factor in GA) and brought his save % down to 2.26. The team has lost faith in him and should start Martin Jones? Yes, that is why he started back to back games versus NJ and NYR, then started 2 days later in Long Island. You know nothing about about this team or its cohesion. Doughty, Kopitar, Brown, carter, gaborik, Muzzin, Quick all play as a team, with new a stellar new addition in Sekara, with Richards and Martinez back: Tanner Pearson due to return soon, as well. l Apparently, Polar Bear, all it takes to be a Hall of Famer on this site is to post idiotic statements like yours over and over again. You seriously summed up an absurd knowledge of hockey and bias in a few sentences, and showed just what a Fu(ktard you really are!
I have read some dumb posts in my 7 years on this site but this one takes the cake, by far. Long time Kings fan (over 30 years) and I have never seen a better clutch goalie than Quick. Playing nervous? He has surrender more than 2 goals only once in the last 10 games (empty net goals do not factor in GA) and brought his save % down to 2.26. The team has lost faith in him and should start Martin Jones? Yes, that is why he started back to back games versus NJ and NYR, then started 2 days later in Long Island. You know nothing about about this team or its cohesion. Doughty, Kopitar, Brown, carter, gaborik, Muzzin, Quick all play as a team, with new a stellar new addition in Sekara, with Richards and Martinez back: Tanner Pearson due to return soon, as well. l Apparently, Polar Bear, all it takes to be a Hall of Famer on this site is to post idiotic statements like yours over and over again. You seriously summed up an absurd knowledge of hockey and bias in a few sentences, and showed just what a Fu(ktard you really are!
Hey dummy! The first paragraph there is from Undertaker in another thread and I cop and pasted it and responded to it in the paragraph below it. Can you seriously not figure that out by reading the entire thing and how the second paragraph is questioning the first paragraph??? So you are insulting the wrong person you ignorant dummy. Notice how the poster of the comment Undertaker responded to me questioning that statement made by him on Monday??? Try reading the entire thread slower this time and maybe your incredibly low IQ will be able to grasp what should have been so incredibly simple for you to comprehend the first time. I was questioning the posters previous post from Monday and comparing to the one he made in this thread. How could you not figure that out on your own by reading this thread???? Just unreal and thanks for the totally unwarranted insults!!!
The lion and the tiger may be more powerful, but the wolf doesn't perform in the circus.
0
Quote Originally Posted by stevopa:
I have read some dumb posts in my 7 years on this site but this one takes the cake, by far. Long time Kings fan (over 30 years) and I have never seen a better clutch goalie than Quick. Playing nervous? He has surrender more than 2 goals only once in the last 10 games (empty net goals do not factor in GA) and brought his save % down to 2.26. The team has lost faith in him and should start Martin Jones? Yes, that is why he started back to back games versus NJ and NYR, then started 2 days later in Long Island. You know nothing about about this team or its cohesion. Doughty, Kopitar, Brown, carter, gaborik, Muzzin, Quick all play as a team, with new a stellar new addition in Sekara, with Richards and Martinez back: Tanner Pearson due to return soon, as well. l Apparently, Polar Bear, all it takes to be a Hall of Famer on this site is to post idiotic statements like yours over and over again. You seriously summed up an absurd knowledge of hockey and bias in a few sentences, and showed just what a Fu(ktard you really are!
Hey dummy! The first paragraph there is from Undertaker in another thread and I cop and pasted it and responded to it in the paragraph below it. Can you seriously not figure that out by reading the entire thing and how the second paragraph is questioning the first paragraph??? So you are insulting the wrong person you ignorant dummy. Notice how the poster of the comment Undertaker responded to me questioning that statement made by him on Monday??? Try reading the entire thread slower this time and maybe your incredibly low IQ will be able to grasp what should have been so incredibly simple for you to comprehend the first time. I was questioning the posters previous post from Monday and comparing to the one he made in this thread. How could you not figure that out on your own by reading this thread???? Just unreal and thanks for the totally unwarranted insults!!!
I ment they are having a poorer then normal year for their standards, and that quick wasn't playing like himself, and that they should give him a break, and that if they didn't they would lose one hockey game. A team can have a bad year, including their goalie, and still hold their reputable resilient traits they are known for and squeek into the playoffs, despite losing one game or despite giving their starting goalie a break for a game.
The lion and the tiger may be more powerful, but the wolf doesn't perform in the circus.
0
Quote Originally Posted by UndertakerNS:
I ment they are having a poorer then normal year for their standards, and that quick wasn't playing like himself, and that they should give him a break, and that if they didn't they would lose one hockey game. A team can have a bad year, including their goalie, and still hold their reputable resilient traits they are known for and squeek into the playoffs, despite losing one game or despite giving their starting goalie a break for a game.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.