WTF?

Question

If it&#x2019;s not a reviewable play, why did the refs &#x201C;get together to discuss it&#x201D;...? They couldn&#x2019;t change the outcome if they actually knew that.

LogCottage · Answer

If it&#x2019;s not a reviewable play, why did the refs &#x201C;get together to discuss it&#x201D;...? They couldn&#x2019;t change the outcome if they actually knew that.

dcp1985 · Answer

To discuss if one of them had actually seen it.  Not reviewable means not video reviewable.

LogCottage · Answer

I don&#x2019;t think so. It had to be called on the ice immediately.

dcp1985 · Answer

Basically thinking that they discuss if the far linesman or far ref might have seen it but not blown the whistle because he figured the closer guy might have whistled it, but before the far guy realizes he was the only one to see it the goal has gone in.  It was a pretty bang bang play after the actual hand pass.

dcp1985 · Answer

It&#x27;s the same way they discuss the puck over glass calls if it&#x27;s not blatantly obvious or there could have been a deflection or just the illusion of a deflection.It happened so quickly if one of the other refs had said they&#x27;d seen it clearly but wasn&#x27;t able to blow the whistle in time they could have changed the "call on the ice".

LogCottage · Answer

My point was there was no need to get together to discuss it when it wasn&#x2019;t called immediately. Even if one of them said they saw it, they couldn&#x2019;t reverse it at that point. That obviously needs to change.

LogCottage · Answer

To be fair, that non-call wouldn&#x2019;t even be an issue if your goalie could have hung on for ONE MINUTE in regulation......

Jars · Answer

They screwed up letting it go to overtime &amp; when that happens you often end up losing. They better come out with extra motivation from this next game.

tonydan · Answer

Glad to be on the right side of that shitttt for once ??????

WTF?

Hot Forum Topics