The puck clearly crossed the line and should've counted.
What BS!
It’s because the glove is covering the puck can’t see it. That’s why I don’t understand how they can’t put a camera on the line of a post or cross bar to clearly see the puck cross.
It’s because the glove is covering the puck can’t see it. That’s why I don’t understand how they can’t put a camera on the line of a post or cross bar to clearly see the puck cross.
@MIZARD
It was pretty obvious that the puck crossed the line. The goalies glove was covering which made it tough to see but still should've counted.
@MIZARD
It was pretty obvious that the puck crossed the line. The goalies glove was covering which made it tough to see but still should've counted.
@docpj72
The glove was completely covering the puck so it's impossible to have any type of video evidence.
I personally felt it should've counted but not a huge deal cause they scored on the PP right after.
@docpj72
The glove was completely covering the puck so it's impossible to have any type of video evidence.
I personally felt it should've counted but not a huge deal cause they scored on the PP right after.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.