i think i'll take some of those shrimps at -3. i haven't checked my lines today.
i think i agree that zimmer is better than garrett generally but i think the dallas coaches have put on one of the better performances in the league so far. anyway, not enough of a difference for me with our system.
biscuit, i can see florida having trouble crossing midfield this weekend like lsu did a couple of years ago. but, i can't see alabama being priced almost 28 points better than FSU last week although i think part of that was the FSU line being too low.
i guess hugh doesn't agree but GB at 6.5 seems high to me. they had a nice game against philly, who isn't that good, but this GB team kind of sucks other than that. houston can play defense and GB's defense is horrible.
i'm not a fan of the giants but 6 seems high when Pitt has a terrible defense and the giants might be the better team.
looks like the shrimps and dallas are going to settle in at 3.
colts are -2 which obviously means luck is playing.
interesting to see chicago at only -1.5. SF is so bad and on the road. chicago has beaten two good teams at home. SF routinely gets blown out on the road. i guess they figure SF has to win again sometime. chicago did lose to the gettys at home.
0
DavidN
football champ
i think i'll take some of those shrimps at -3. i haven't checked my lines today.
i think i agree that zimmer is better than garrett generally but i think the dallas coaches have put on one of the better performances in the league so far. anyway, not enough of a difference for me with our system.
biscuit, i can see florida having trouble crossing midfield this weekend like lsu did a couple of years ago. but, i can't see alabama being priced almost 28 points better than FSU last week although i think part of that was the FSU line being too low.
i guess hugh doesn't agree but GB at 6.5 seems high to me. they had a nice game against philly, who isn't that good, but this GB team kind of sucks other than that. houston can play defense and GB's defense is horrible.
i'm not a fan of the giants but 6 seems high when Pitt has a terrible defense and the giants might be the better team.
looks like the shrimps and dallas are going to settle in at 3.
colts are -2 which obviously means luck is playing.
interesting to see chicago at only -1.5. SF is so bad and on the road. chicago has beaten two good teams at home. SF routinely gets blown out on the road. i guess they figure SF has to win again sometime. chicago did lose to the gettys at home.
everyone here will be on the shrimps at 3. it will be the first penalty box consensus play. and then they will lose by 10 and bring the penalty box down forever.
0
everyone here will be on the shrimps at 3. it will be the first penalty box consensus play. and then they will lose by 10 and bring the penalty box down forever.
zimmer is out tonight. that's a big deal on a short week. minn probably is not as bad off as denmver was when kubiak was out all week but this is definitely not what you want for a thursday game. i'm staying away.
however, the line is staying at 3. probably because dallas only beat the shrimps by 10 the other week.
0
zimmer is out tonight. that's a big deal on a short week. minn probably is not as bad off as denmver was when kubiak was out all week but this is definitely not what you want for a thursday game. i'm staying away.
however, the line is staying at 3. probably because dallas only beat the shrimps by 10 the other week.
Shrimps O line healthier, Jimmney Smity back, fish losing wr Parker, all things point to yet another Ravens victory. Count me in - 3 looks like the line is moving up.
0
Shrimps O line healthier, Jimmney Smity back, fish losing wr Parker, all things point to yet another Ravens victory. Count me in - 3 looks like the line is moving up.
i'm going to jump on the shrimps -3 as well. might buy out if i come to my senses and realize the shrimps aren't any good, but no way this line goes below 3.
Shrimps -3
0
i'm going to jump on the shrimps -3 as well. might buy out if i come to my senses and realize the shrimps aren't any good, but no way this line goes below 3.
I don't understand why the Dallas line is now at 3 (-110) or thereabouts.
I bet it earlier at -120, thinking it was going to 3.5
While this minor move has me somewhat concerned, that did not stop me from betting more on Dallas.
Of course with this line movement, and BigFnPoo being on the Cowboys, all I need now is for scal to do a 17 page writeup on the Boys and I will be able to go to sleep by 9:00pm, knowing full well that my money is toast
bigreds daddy
0
I don't understand why the Dallas line is now at 3 (-110) or thereabouts.
I bet it earlier at -120, thinking it was going to 3.5
While this minor move has me somewhat concerned, that did not stop me from betting more on Dallas.
Of course with this line movement, and BigFnPoo being on the Cowboys, all I need now is for scal to do a 17 page writeup on the Boys and I will be able to go to sleep by 9:00pm, knowing full well that my money is toast
i'm going to jump on the shrimps -3 as well. might buy out if i come to my senses and realize the shrimps aren't any good, but no way this line goes below 3.
Shrimps -3
Earlier in this thread I wrote the Shrimp's at -3 were on my radar, but did not pull the trigger.
Now I only have -3.5 available to me
If ever there was an offense that scares the crap out of me laying that extra half, it's the Shrimp's offense
bigreds daddy
0
Quote Originally Posted by ClubDirt:
i'm going to jump on the shrimps -3 as well. might buy out if i come to my senses and realize the shrimps aren't any good, but no way this line goes below 3.
Shrimps -3
Earlier in this thread I wrote the Shrimp's at -3 were on my radar, but did not pull the trigger.
Now I only have -3.5 available to me
If ever there was an offense that scares the crap out of me laying that extra half, it's the Shrimp's offense
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
looks like the line is moving up. 
Hot Forum Topics
