I'm hoping Baker is named starter, then I'll take his yards Under. Chase Young at 7 Sacks is intriguing, he hasn't been put on PUP list yet but I might put a little on his Under hoping he is then see limited playing time to start with
0
I'm hoping Baker is named starter, then I'll take his yards Under. Chase Young at 7 Sacks is intriguing, he hasn't been put on PUP list yet but I might put a little on his Under hoping he is then see limited playing time to start with
GLuck with your plays.Does anyone know if FD waits till end of season to grade baseball RSW if you have Overs that have hit.Thats what i heard and if true thats stoopid.
0
GLuck with your plays.Does anyone know if FD waits till end of season to grade baseball RSW if you have Overs that have hit.Thats what i heard and if true thats stoopid.
GLuck with your plays.Does anyone know if FD waits till end of season to grade baseball RSW if you have Overs that have hit.Thats what i heard and if true thats stoopid.
Yes because there is usually a sneaky 'minimum games played' on those, like 160
0
Quote Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1:
GLuck with your plays.Does anyone know if FD waits till end of season to grade baseball RSW if you have Overs that have hit.Thats what i heard and if true thats stoopid.
Yes because there is usually a sneaky 'minimum games played' on those, like 160
Quote Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1: GLuck with your plays.Does anyone know if FD waits till end of season to grade baseball RSW if you have Overs that have hit.Thats what i heard and if true thats stoopid. Yes because there is usually a sneaky 'minimum games played' on those, like 160
Those books are really sneaky ...I always read all the terms and conditions on futures , after getting screwed by a local almost 20 years ago .
Some count it as long as the missed games has no impact on grading the wagers ...
Some books cancel the wager if all 162 games are not played
Some books cancel the wins and count the losses ( Fartnoy has done this )
BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
0
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77:
Quote Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1: GLuck with your plays.Does anyone know if FD waits till end of season to grade baseball RSW if you have Overs that have hit.Thats what i heard and if true thats stoopid. Yes because there is usually a sneaky 'minimum games played' on those, like 160
Those books are really sneaky ...I always read all the terms and conditions on futures , after getting screwed by a local almost 20 years ago .
Some count it as long as the missed games has no impact on grading the wagers ...
Some books cancel the wager if all 162 games are not played
Some books cancel the wins and count the losses ( Fartnoy has done this )
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77: Quote Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1: GLuck with your plays.Does anyone know if FD waits till end of season to grade baseball RSW if you have Overs that have hit.Thats what i heard and if true thats stoopid. Yes because there is usually a sneaky 'minimum games played' on those, like 160 Those books are really sneaky ...I always read all the terms and conditions on futures , after getting screwed by a local almost 20 years ago . Some count it as long as the missed games has no impact on grading the wagers ... Some books cancel the wager if all 162 games are not played Some books cancel the wins and count the losses ( Fartnoy has done this )
"Make the Playoffs" bets in baseball are screwy now. On my book, the Wild Card game was not considered 'playoffs' in the last 2 years. Stupid. What was worse is that nobody could give me a definite answer either way heading towards the game. I wonder if they will change that now with a 3 game Wild Card Series, they'd pretty much have to. I didn't bet any this year, so it won't matter to me but would like to know what the rulings are from site to site
0
Quote Originally Posted by DoubleUp4Life:
Quote Originally Posted by BWS77: Quote Originally Posted by Biscuiteater1: GLuck with your plays.Does anyone know if FD waits till end of season to grade baseball RSW if you have Overs that have hit.Thats what i heard and if true thats stoopid. Yes because there is usually a sneaky 'minimum games played' on those, like 160 Those books are really sneaky ...I always read all the terms and conditions on futures , after getting screwed by a local almost 20 years ago . Some count it as long as the missed games has no impact on grading the wagers ... Some books cancel the wager if all 162 games are not played Some books cancel the wins and count the losses ( Fartnoy has done this )
"Make the Playoffs" bets in baseball are screwy now. On my book, the Wild Card game was not considered 'playoffs' in the last 2 years. Stupid. What was worse is that nobody could give me a definite answer either way heading towards the game. I wonder if they will change that now with a 3 game Wild Card Series, they'd pretty much have to. I didn't bet any this year, so it won't matter to me but would like to know what the rulings are from site to site
..I couldn't get a straight forward answer printed out at the brick and mortar sportsbook here in WNY ...The ticket writers had 3 different sets of rules for grading to make MLB playoffs last year ....The website Posted them and then took them down 2 weeks before the season started ( Shady as Faxk ) ...
I stopped using my players card at the sportsbook last year after being spooled a few hundred times ( they'd change the odds while I'm trying to hit confirm , then often change the odds back 10+ minutes later , SHADY ) ..
BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
0
@BWS77
Smart to just stay away from the BS ..
..I couldn't get a straight forward answer printed out at the brick and mortar sportsbook here in WNY ...The ticket writers had 3 different sets of rules for grading to make MLB playoffs last year ....The website Posted them and then took them down 2 weeks before the season started ( Shady as Faxk ) ...
I stopped using my players card at the sportsbook last year after being spooled a few hundred times ( they'd change the odds while I'm trying to hit confirm , then often change the odds back 10+ minutes later , SHADY ) ..
I wanted to play the Bills in some form but that schedule has me worried . I do agree with sac here also . Think the Steelers with Trubisky and Pickett may hold some good value
0
I wanted to play the Bills in some form but that schedule has me worried . I do agree with sac here also . Think the Steelers with Trubisky and Pickett may hold some good value
There is almost no value on the BILLS at the moment ...It's beyond ridiculous that they're the chalk in all 17 games and only +600 to win the Super Bowl ...
I have major concerns about McDermott being smart enough is critical situations against the best coaches in the league ...
The 13 second choke is the worst in Buffalo sports history( we've had tons of them) , it falls squarely on him ...McDermott is 0-4 on the road in the playoffs...He and Leslie Frazier can really suck on defensive in game adjustments too . .When the Patriots abandoned the forward pass completely in the 70 mph wind game , it took those derps 3.5 quarters to put 5 men on the line of scrimmage to stop the run ...When they finally did the Patriots went backwards 5 of 7 plays ....That's just one example ,but I can give at least 20 more ....He is an excellent coach when they have a big lead , not so much in tight games where adjustments need to be made .....
The Steelers have tremendous value ...they were my first futures bet back in March to win the division...Can't believe +900 is still out there...Trubisky and or Pickett should be a massive upgrade over old Ben kenobi ..They made other nice additions and subtraction on both sides of ball. The Bengals look good , but let's see what they do with a first place schedule ...Who the H E L L will Lamar be throwing the ball to ??? The Browns are the BROWNS ...
BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
0
@trainwreck66
There is almost no value on the BILLS at the moment ...It's beyond ridiculous that they're the chalk in all 17 games and only +600 to win the Super Bowl ...
I have major concerns about McDermott being smart enough is critical situations against the best coaches in the league ...
The 13 second choke is the worst in Buffalo sports history( we've had tons of them) , it falls squarely on him ...McDermott is 0-4 on the road in the playoffs...He and Leslie Frazier can really suck on defensive in game adjustments too . .When the Patriots abandoned the forward pass completely in the 70 mph wind game , it took those derps 3.5 quarters to put 5 men on the line of scrimmage to stop the run ...When they finally did the Patriots went backwards 5 of 7 plays ....That's just one example ,but I can give at least 20 more ....He is an excellent coach when they have a big lead , not so much in tight games where adjustments need to be made .....
The Steelers have tremendous value ...they were my first futures bet back in March to win the division...Can't believe +900 is still out there...Trubisky and or Pickett should be a massive upgrade over old Ben kenobi ..They made other nice additions and subtraction on both sides of ball. The Bengals look good , but let's see what they do with a first place schedule ...Who the H E L L will Lamar be throwing the ball to ??? The Browns are the BROWNS ...
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970: Bills and bucneers. Auto corrrected. Bills +300 bucs plus 400. As someone who believes rhe nfl is more sports entertainment than football , that matchup would likely be a wet dream for the NFL ..IMO
The bills are plus 600 the bucs plus 800
My thought is if either team reaches the super bowl they will be the favorite on the money line.
The other team will have value from the championship game to the superbowl
And with new york has the thumb on the scale in review of plays Bills versus Bucs will sell audiencesl
0
Quote Originally Posted by DoubleUp4Life:
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970: Bills and bucneers. Auto corrrected. Bills +300 bucs plus 400. As someone who believes rhe nfl is more sports entertainment than football , that matchup would likely be a wet dream for the NFL ..IMO
The bills are plus 600 the bucs plus 800
My thought is if either team reaches the super bowl they will be the favorite on the money line.
The other team will have value from the championship game to the superbowl
And with new york has the thumb on the scale in review of plays Bills versus Bucs will sell audiencesl
The team I see that up in the air is Cleveland for a pure nostalgia .... 50 for 1000 is still lean for a bet if that moves to 50 for 2000 I have to bite on that.
can't see Godell allowing Watson anywhere near that trophy at any point....
He is a public relations nightmare and an utter embarrassment to the Browns franchise....The league is marketing hard towards women ...The only chance the Browns have ot winning a super Bowl is to cut ties with him....
I will say he is the perfect WWE style heel for the entertainment aspect......Kind of hope he starts at Buffalo November 20th , expect the fans to be way worse than they were to even Michael Vick ( he looked like he wanted to spontaneous combust on the bench here) ...
BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
0
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970:
The team I see that up in the air is Cleveland for a pure nostalgia .... 50 for 1000 is still lean for a bet if that moves to 50 for 2000 I have to bite on that.
can't see Godell allowing Watson anywhere near that trophy at any point....
He is a public relations nightmare and an utter embarrassment to the Browns franchise....The league is marketing hard towards women ...The only chance the Browns have ot winning a super Bowl is to cut ties with him....
I will say he is the perfect WWE style heel for the entertainment aspect......Kind of hope he starts at Buffalo November 20th , expect the fans to be way worse than they were to even Michael Vick ( he looked like he wanted to spontaneous combust on the bench here) ...
Quote Originally Posted by DoubleUp4Life: Quote Originally Posted by nature1970: Bills and bucneers. Auto corrrected. Bills +300 bucs plus 400. As someone who believes rhe nfl is more sports entertainment than football , that matchup would likely be a wet dream for the NFL ..IMO The bills are plus 600 the bucs plus 800 My thought is if either team reaches the super bowl they will be the favorite on the money line. The other team will have value from the championship game to the superbowl And with new york has the thumb on the scale in review of plays Bills versus Bucs will sell audiencesl
If we go the sports entertainment human intrest story angle , we can't discount that the BILLS will be honoring the BUFFALO mass shooting victims all season ....Also they just signed a massive deal with the state for a new futuristic stadium !!! NY State is shelling out a lot of tax dollars ..
BEST OF HEALTH, HAPPINESS,WEALTH, BLESSINGS and LUCK TO ALL !!
0
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970:
Quote Originally Posted by DoubleUp4Life: Quote Originally Posted by nature1970: Bills and bucneers. Auto corrrected. Bills +300 bucs plus 400. As someone who believes rhe nfl is more sports entertainment than football , that matchup would likely be a wet dream for the NFL ..IMO The bills are plus 600 the bucs plus 800 My thought is if either team reaches the super bowl they will be the favorite on the money line. The other team will have value from the championship game to the superbowl And with new york has the thumb on the scale in review of plays Bills versus Bucs will sell audiencesl
If we go the sports entertainment human intrest story angle , we can't discount that the BILLS will be honoring the BUFFALO mass shooting victims all season ....Also they just signed a massive deal with the state for a new futuristic stadium !!! NY State is shelling out a lot of tax dollars ..
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970: Quote Originally Posted by DoubleUp4Life: Quote Originally Posted by nature1970: Bills and bucneers. Auto corrrected. Bills +300 bucs plus 400. As someone who believes rhe nfl is more sports entertainment than football , that matchup would likely be a wet dream for the NFL ..IMO The bills are plus 600 the bucs plus 800 My thought is if either team reaches the super bowl they will be the favorite on the money line. The other team will have value from the championship game to the superbowl And with new york has the thumb on the scale in review of plays Bills versus Bucs will sell audiencesl If we go the sports entertainment human intrest story angle , we can't discount that the BILLS will be honoring the BUFFALO mass shooting victims all season ....Also they just signed a massive deal with the state for a new futuristic stadium !!! NY State is shelling out a lot of tax dollars ..
See this angle new stadium ,
personal interest after the top grocery market attack.
The fact that NFL want to expand to the Canadian European markets.
This is the angles for great story lines.
1
Quote Originally Posted by DoubleUp4Life:
Quote Originally Posted by nature1970: Quote Originally Posted by DoubleUp4Life: Quote Originally Posted by nature1970: Bills and bucneers. Auto corrrected. Bills +300 bucs plus 400. As someone who believes rhe nfl is more sports entertainment than football , that matchup would likely be a wet dream for the NFL ..IMO The bills are plus 600 the bucs plus 800 My thought is if either team reaches the super bowl they will be the favorite on the money line. The other team will have value from the championship game to the superbowl And with new york has the thumb on the scale in review of plays Bills versus Bucs will sell audiencesl If we go the sports entertainment human intrest story angle , we can't discount that the BILLS will be honoring the BUFFALO mass shooting victims all season ....Also they just signed a massive deal with the state for a new futuristic stadium !!! NY State is shelling out a lot of tax dollars ..
See this angle new stadium ,
personal interest after the top grocery market attack.
The fact that NFL want to expand to the Canadian European markets.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.