Former WH chief of staff Mark Meadows, reveals that trump tested positive for covid-19 just 3 days before first debate
Reports pouring in from multiple media sources indicate that the WH wanted to keep quiet trump's positve test result. He took a different covid test and it indicated negative. So then he insisted on using that negative test as his official status and bury the positive test from the public.
4
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Former WH chief of staff Mark Meadows, reveals that trump tested positive for covid-19 just 3 days before first debate
Reports pouring in from multiple media sources indicate that the WH wanted to keep quiet trump's positve test result. He took a different covid test and it indicated negative. So then he insisted on using that negative test as his official status and bury the positive test from the public.
Former WH chief of staff Mark Meadows, reveals that trump tested positive for covid-19 just 3 days before first debate
Reports pouring in from multiple media sources indicate that the WH wanted to keep quiet trump's positve test result. He took a different covid test and it indicated negative. So then he insisted on using that negative test as his official status and bury the positive test from the public.
Shortly after the debate the WH acknowledged trump tested positive again and was so sick he was immediately admitted to hospital. He became much more sick than the public was ever told at the time.
This indicates his prior positive was true and accurate, and that trump recklessly risked the heath of hundreds of people at the WH ceremony for Judge Amy Barrett, meetings with Gold Star families, and then the future president at the debate - as well as all the production staff and security staff around the first debate.
4
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Former WH chief of staff Mark Meadows, reveals that trump tested positive for covid-19 just 3 days before first debate
Reports pouring in from multiple media sources indicate that the WH wanted to keep quiet trump's positve test result. He took a different covid test and it indicated negative. So then he insisted on using that negative test as his official status and bury the positive test from the public.
Shortly after the debate the WH acknowledged trump tested positive again and was so sick he was immediately admitted to hospital. He became much more sick than the public was ever told at the time.
This indicates his prior positive was true and accurate, and that trump recklessly risked the heath of hundreds of people at the WH ceremony for Judge Amy Barrett, meetings with Gold Star families, and then the future president at the debate - as well as all the production staff and security staff around the first debate.
“I didn’t want to take any unnecessary risks,” Meadows writes, “but I also didn’t want to alarm the public if there was nothing to worry about – which according to the new, much more accurate test, there was not.”
0
“I didn’t want to take any unnecessary risks,” Meadows writes, “but I also didn’t want to alarm the public if there was nothing to worry about – which according to the new, much more accurate test, there was not.”
“I didn’t want to take any unnecessary risks,” Meadows writes, “but I also didn’t want to alarm the public if there was nothing to worry about – which according to the new, much more accurate test, there was not.”
until the 2 days later when the new updated test showed positive and he was really sick at that point.
since the virus takes several days to metastasize from mere infection to fullblown sickness it is evident from his sickness two days after the debate that he was indeed infect well befor meaning that first test was correct and should not have been hidden from the public
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
4
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox:
“I didn’t want to take any unnecessary risks,” Meadows writes, “but I also didn’t want to alarm the public if there was nothing to worry about – which according to the new, much more accurate test, there was not.”
until the 2 days later when the new updated test showed positive and he was really sick at that point.
since the virus takes several days to metastasize from mere infection to fullblown sickness it is evident from his sickness two days after the debate that he was indeed infect well befor meaning that first test was correct and should not have been hidden from the public
Former WH chief of staff Mark Meadows, reveals that trump tested positive for covid-19 just 3 days before first debate
Reports pouring in from multiple media sources indicate that the WH wanted to keep quiet trump's positve test result. He took a different covid test and it indicated negative. So then he insisted on using that negative test as his official status and bury the positive test from the public.
Shortly after the debate the WH acknowledged trump tested positive again and was so sick he was immediately admitted to hospital. He became much more sick than the public was ever told at the time.
This indicates his prior positive was true and accurate, and that trump recklessly risked the heath of hundreds of people at the WH ceremony for Judge Amy Barrett, meetings with Gold Star families, and then the future president at the debate - as well as all the production staff and security staff around the first debate.
adolf trump denies report from Meadows; says it's "fake news"
.....and of course blames CNN
4
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Former WH chief of staff Mark Meadows, reveals that trump tested positive for covid-19 just 3 days before first debate
Reports pouring in from multiple media sources indicate that the WH wanted to keep quiet trump's positve test result. He took a different covid test and it indicated negative. So then he insisted on using that negative test as his official status and bury the positive test from the public.
Shortly after the debate the WH acknowledged trump tested positive again and was so sick he was immediately admitted to hospital. He became much more sick than the public was ever told at the time.
This indicates his prior positive was true and accurate, and that trump recklessly risked the heath of hundreds of people at the WH ceremony for Judge Amy Barrett, meetings with Gold Star families, and then the future president at the debate - as well as all the production staff and security staff around the first debate.
adolf trump denies report from Meadows; says it's "fake news"
They are stretching at anything they can to try to cover biden and the horrid performance he's giving us. They are stretching like 85% of their threads/posts.
1
@UNIMAN
They are stretching at anything they can to try to cover biden and the horrid performance he's giving us. They are stretching like 85% of their threads/posts.
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox: “I didn’t want to take any unnecessary risks,” Meadows writes, “but I also didn’t want to alarm the public if there was nothing to worry about – which according to the new, much more accurate test, there was not.” until the 2 days later when the new updated test showed positive and he was really sick at that point. since the virus takes several days to metastasize from mere infection to fullblown sickness it is evident from his sickness two days after the debate that he was indeed infect well befor meaning that first test was correct and should not have been hidden from the public
Right, Kelly. His severe illness 2 days after the debate -- combined with the FACT that it takes several days to reach that stage of severe illness -- *PROVES* he was positive days BEFORE the debate.
4
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox: “I didn’t want to take any unnecessary risks,” Meadows writes, “but I also didn’t want to alarm the public if there was nothing to worry about – which according to the new, much more accurate test, there was not.” until the 2 days later when the new updated test showed positive and he was really sick at that point. since the virus takes several days to metastasize from mere infection to fullblown sickness it is evident from his sickness two days after the debate that he was indeed infect well befor meaning that first test was correct and should not have been hidden from the public
Right, Kelly. His severe illness 2 days after the debate -- combined with the FACT that it takes several days to reach that stage of severe illness -- *PROVES* he was positive days BEFORE the debate.
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox: “I didn’t want to take any unnecessary risks,” Meadows writes, “but I also didn’t want to alarm the public if there was nothing to worry about – which according to the new, much more accurate test, there was not.” until the 2 days later when the new updated test showed positive and he was really sick at that point. since the virus takes several days to metastasize from mere infection to fullblown sickness it is evident from his sickness two days after the debate that he was indeed infect well befor meaning that first test was correct and should not have been hidden from the public Right, Kelly. His severe illness 2 days after the debate -- combined with the FACT that it takes several days to reach that stage of severe illness -- *PROVES* he was positive days BEFORE the debate.
That is accurate. It does require several days to incubate from the date of first infection. So working back from the time he was admitted into hospital means he was infected several days before then, which would be well before that first debate.
4
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964: Quote Originally Posted by I_Need_A_Detox: “I didn’t want to take any unnecessary risks,” Meadows writes, “but I also didn’t want to alarm the public if there was nothing to worry about – which according to the new, much more accurate test, there was not.” until the 2 days later when the new updated test showed positive and he was really sick at that point. since the virus takes several days to metastasize from mere infection to fullblown sickness it is evident from his sickness two days after the debate that he was indeed infect well befor meaning that first test was correct and should not have been hidden from the public Right, Kelly. His severe illness 2 days after the debate -- combined with the FACT that it takes several days to reach that stage of severe illness -- *PROVES* he was positive days BEFORE the debate.
That is accurate. It does require several days to incubate from the date of first infection. So working back from the time he was admitted into hospital means he was infected several days before then, which would be well before that first debate.
Former WH chief of staff Mark Meadows, reveals that trump tested positive for covid-19 just 3 days before first debate
Reports pouring in from multiple media sources indicate that the WH wanted to keep quiet trump's positve test result. He took a different covid test and it indicated negative. So then he insisted on using that negative test as his official status and bury the positive test from the public.
Alyssa Farrah, former WH Director of strategic communications under trump in 2020, who was not told of his 1st positive status, said: 'This revelation shocked me'
"This is a flagrant disregard for the health of the American public! One of my colleagues could have been killed!!!"
VIDEO interview: https://tinyurl.com/3snuypbz
1
Quote Originally Posted by fubah2:
Former WH chief of staff Mark Meadows, reveals that trump tested positive for covid-19 just 3 days before first debate
Reports pouring in from multiple media sources indicate that the WH wanted to keep quiet trump's positve test result. He took a different covid test and it indicated negative. So then he insisted on using that negative test as his official status and bury the positive test from the public.
Alyssa Farrah, former WH Director of strategic communications under trump in 2020, who was not told of his 1st positive status, said: 'This revelation shocked me'
"This is a flagrant disregard for the health of the American public! One of my colleagues could have been killed!!!"
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.