Dolphins +170 ML vs Raiders
Jets +450 ML vs Broncos
Jaguars +280 ML vs Cardinals
Colts +205 ML vs Titans
@I_Need_A_Detox
That would knock me out
I don't see it Brother....Jersey Jets S U C K ....
Of course its the NFL, anything can happen though ...
@I_Need_A_Detox
That would knock me out
I don't see it Brother....Jersey Jets S U C K ....
Of course its the NFL, anything can happen though ...
Two teams who will probably have backup QB's, and the other 2 teams have rookies starting who are not yet ready.
I wouldn't be shocked if 1 of your teams wins, but kinda hard to see 2 of them winning.
But that's why they play the games. GL Detox
Two teams who will probably have backup QB's, and the other 2 teams have rookies starting who are not yet ready.
I wouldn't be shocked if 1 of your teams wins, but kinda hard to see 2 of them winning.
But that's why they play the games. GL Detox
Or the Cards losing to the Jags on the road the week before they have to play the Rams...
Or the Cards losing to the Jags on the road the week before they have to play the Rams...
If the NYJ don't win you will need to go 2-1 with the other 3 to make anything.
NYJ with a rookie QB on the road and a 1st year coach in the Bronco's first home game? You know Lawrence leads the NFL along with Zack Wilson with 5 interceptions and has the worst QB grade out of all the 35 qbs that have played so far, right? AZ defense is 4th in sacks and it's offense is 2nd in points. That's an 0-2 right off the bat with NYJ & JAX.
MI off a so loss and @home and they beat LV (barely) last year? Possibly, but starting QB is out. On the plus side, you are catching LV in a "look-ahead" spot and Gruden has a poor record in 1pm ET games.
Indy qualifies as a strong trend in week 3. Since 2016 0-2 teams that were .500 or better the year before are 10-1 ats week 3. But ats doesn't equal ml su. Another team with QB issues too. And that bad Tenn defense will have to play X-tra bad this week @home.
Ats trends do however favor 0-2 teams week 3 though. Since 2016 0-2 teams were 21-5 ats. as of the beginning of last year. So baring any b.s. Covid issues, ats. is where these week 3 trends point to. Not a rookie QB getting his first win or hobbled or replacement QBs turning things around. But as the saying goes "on any given Sunday", so GL on those long odds.
If the NYJ don't win you will need to go 2-1 with the other 3 to make anything.
NYJ with a rookie QB on the road and a 1st year coach in the Bronco's first home game? You know Lawrence leads the NFL along with Zack Wilson with 5 interceptions and has the worst QB grade out of all the 35 qbs that have played so far, right? AZ defense is 4th in sacks and it's offense is 2nd in points. That's an 0-2 right off the bat with NYJ & JAX.
MI off a so loss and @home and they beat LV (barely) last year? Possibly, but starting QB is out. On the plus side, you are catching LV in a "look-ahead" spot and Gruden has a poor record in 1pm ET games.
Indy qualifies as a strong trend in week 3. Since 2016 0-2 teams that were .500 or better the year before are 10-1 ats week 3. But ats doesn't equal ml su. Another team with QB issues too. And that bad Tenn defense will have to play X-tra bad this week @home.
Ats trends do however favor 0-2 teams week 3 though. Since 2016 0-2 teams were 21-5 ats. as of the beginning of last year. So baring any b.s. Covid issues, ats. is where these week 3 trends point to. Not a rookie QB getting his first win or hobbled or replacement QBs turning things around. But as the saying goes "on any given Sunday", so GL on those long odds.
@Doja45
@Doja45
It's a 1-15 team from a year ago on a 17 game losing streak. Arizona is just inconsistently bad enough to let the Jaguars win this game. They're also inconsistently good enough to be resting their starters in the 4th quarter. The Cards are the most bet team right now at -7.5 but the line isn't moving.
It's a 1-15 team from a year ago on a 17 game losing streak. Arizona is just inconsistently bad enough to let the Jaguars win this game. They're also inconsistently good enough to be resting their starters in the 4th quarter. The Cards are the most bet team right now at -7.5 but the line isn't moving.
@I_Need_A_Detox
Respect for being the first one to chime in and own it...betting dogs can always go sidewides and is not for the faint of heart
Jets and Jags may end up going down in history as the two worst teams combined in the same season...two rookie QBs playing at HS level speed versus NFL professionals looking to pad all their personal stats every snap versus these two kids.
Better luck next week and beyond with your sports wagers...
@I_Need_A_Detox
Respect for being the first one to chime in and own it...betting dogs can always go sidewides and is not for the faint of heart
Jets and Jags may end up going down in history as the two worst teams combined in the same season...two rookie QBs playing at HS level speed versus NFL professionals looking to pad all their personal stats every snap versus these two kids.
Better luck next week and beyond with your sports wagers...
Gambling on sports has to be the hardest way to make a living. I would guess that tens of millions of people have dreamed about it but only a handful have ever been able to do it successfully.
It’s probably harder to become a professional sports gambler than it is to become a professional athlete.
Anyways, my much anticipated card will be dropped later on today. Just crossing the t’s and dotting the i’s.
Gambling on sports has to be the hardest way to make a living. I would guess that tens of millions of people have dreamed about it but only a handful have ever been able to do it successfully.
It’s probably harder to become a professional sports gambler than it is to become a professional athlete.
Anyways, my much anticipated card will be dropped later on today. Just crossing the t’s and dotting the i’s.
This site is full of pea brains telling you they’re killing it gambling on sports.
I’m 40 years old. I’ve been gambling on sports for 27 years. I was a degenerate in my teens and early 20’s. I was a bookie for a few years. I went to the local bar and let people bet on horses for the big races. Nobody wins betting on horses. Might as well just lite your money on fire. I know hundreds of gamblers. I know a handful of bookies. I played golf for years with one of the biggest bookies in the Boston area before he was indicted. You know how many people win that gamble on a consistent basis? None. Nobody wins. Yet people are lined up to partake in this activity.
Then we have stocks and real estate. You know who wins in stocks and real estate? Everyone. Literally every single person.
I’m not sure what the psychology is behind this but it’s pretty interesting to me.
Thoughts?
This site is full of pea brains telling you they’re killing it gambling on sports.
I’m 40 years old. I’ve been gambling on sports for 27 years. I was a degenerate in my teens and early 20’s. I was a bookie for a few years. I went to the local bar and let people bet on horses for the big races. Nobody wins betting on horses. Might as well just lite your money on fire. I know hundreds of gamblers. I know a handful of bookies. I played golf for years with one of the biggest bookies in the Boston area before he was indicted. You know how many people win that gamble on a consistent basis? None. Nobody wins. Yet people are lined up to partake in this activity.
Then we have stocks and real estate. You know who wins in stocks and real estate? Everyone. Literally every single person.
I’m not sure what the psychology is behind this but it’s pretty interesting to me.
Thoughts?
If you’re a young kid and you like gambling you always want to be the house. Be the bookie. When you go to party’s on Friday and Saturday nights be the blackjack dealer.
I feel like this isn’t taught enough or talked about enough on this site.
If you’re a young kid and you like gambling you always want to be the house. Be the bookie. When you go to party’s on Friday and Saturday nights be the blackjack dealer.
I feel like this isn’t taught enough or talked about enough on this site.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.