All thus idiot had to do is shot his focking mouth , be contrite, and testify but he did none of those things
All thus idiot had to do is shot his focking mouth , be contrite, and testify but he did none of those things
But I think had Trump let his lawyers handle his case it’s more likely he would have emerged victorious or with a hung jury!
Reminds me of a mustachioed man who some years ago kept overruling his generals thereby accelerating his armies’ defeats.
Yet another similarity.
if he we’re to be elected again just think of all the military leader he praised only to disparage months later!
But I think had Trump let his lawyers handle his case it’s more likely he would have emerged victorious or with a hung jury!
Reminds me of a mustachioed man who some years ago kept overruling his generals thereby accelerating his armies’ defeats.
Yet another similarity.
if he we’re to be elected again just think of all the military leader he praised only to disparage months later!
He’s banking on Leonard Leo’s bribes to Clarence, Sammy, Brett and Amy to help bail him out on a petition for cert with the SCOTUS. He usually doesn’t interfere with his appellate attorneys. They will argue that a state court has no jurisdiction over a federal question (the underlying election fraud).
One wild card touches on one of your valid points - his trial counsel didn’t CYA very well with preserving issues and objections. Probably because he was right there, telling them what to do. If he had let the lawyers lawyer, he coulda defeated the weakest of the three cases against him.
(I say that because this one has the weirdest legal theory - it works but it does have a bit of a reach.)
instead, he and his counsel handled it poorly. If this is how he intends to handle the other (much stronger) cases against him, he’s FUBAR.
(I say that because unless he wins the election, he is FUBAR on the documents case. He is less FUBAR against the Georgia case, but that one doesn’t look good for him either.) He’s already made so many damaging public admissions on that (documents) case the only hope is for winning the election, or hoping for prosecutorial error. Jack Smith doesn’t make many unforced errors.
He’s banking on Leonard Leo’s bribes to Clarence, Sammy, Brett and Amy to help bail him out on a petition for cert with the SCOTUS. He usually doesn’t interfere with his appellate attorneys. They will argue that a state court has no jurisdiction over a federal question (the underlying election fraud).
One wild card touches on one of your valid points - his trial counsel didn’t CYA very well with preserving issues and objections. Probably because he was right there, telling them what to do. If he had let the lawyers lawyer, he coulda defeated the weakest of the three cases against him.
(I say that because this one has the weirdest legal theory - it works but it does have a bit of a reach.)
instead, he and his counsel handled it poorly. If this is how he intends to handle the other (much stronger) cases against him, he’s FUBAR.
(I say that because unless he wins the election, he is FUBAR on the documents case. He is less FUBAR against the Georgia case, but that one doesn’t look good for him either.) He’s already made so many damaging public admissions on that (documents) case the only hope is for winning the election, or hoping for prosecutorial error. Jack Smith doesn’t make many unforced errors.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.