From an article the IER put out in May of 2020:
Impact of Biden’s Bans on Fracking and Oil Production on Federal Lands and Offshore
At his debate with Bernie Sanders on March 15, 2020, Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden said he would prevent oil companies from drilling as part of his effort to combat climate change. At the CNN debate, he said “No more drilling on federal lands. No more drilling, including offshore. No ability for the oil industry to continue to drill, period. Ends.” He also said there would be no “new fracking” and “not another coal plant will be built” under his administration. The U.S. Chamber of Commerce did two studies that address these issues: a ban on hydraulic fracturing and a ban on drilling on federal lands and offshore areas. In both cases, the effects are devastating, with huge losses to the economy, higher energy prices, and lower employment.
Biden’s policies would produce similar effects on the oil industry as the coronavirus pandemic and the Saudi-Russia price war, only in Biden’s case, demand for oil products would still be strong and the United States would become dependent on foreign oil again, making Saudi Arabia and Russia jubilant, but increasing U.S. energy prices and putting our national security in danger.
Impact of a Ban on Fracking
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce’s Global Energy Institute found that a fracking ban would double gasoline prices as oil prices spike to $130 per barrel, raise the average cost of living by $5,661 per person, and reduce employment by 19 million people over a five-year period. Prohibiting fracking would also quadruple electricity prices, reduce Gross Domestic Product (GDP) by $7.1 trillion, and increase natural gas prices by 324 percent from 2021 to 2025, causing household energy bills to more than quadruple. This would be the equivalent of a major recession.
A ban on fracking would effectively represent a ban on U.S. natural-gas extraction, given that 95 percent of natural-gas production involves hydraulic fracturing. Natural gas is not only used for electricity generation where environmentalists want it replaced with renewable energy, but it is also used in cooking and heating homes and other buildings, in factories for manufacturing and processing, and in agriculture to pump water. In 2019, all renewables (hydro, solar, wind, biomass, and geothermal) represented 11.4 percent of the nation’s energy supply. Wind and solar combined represented just 3.8 percent of that supply. Politicians’ expectation that these sources will replace fossil fuels is bewildering. Yet, for some reason, some Americans want to believe them. Perhaps Michael Moore’s new movie, Planet of the Humans, will help convince some of the folly of so-called “green energy” sources.