Chris Krebs is getting destroyed today in the live senate hearings. Senator after senator questioning Krebs reveal an utter failure to do his job. Krebs admitted under oath the following.
1) He did not investigate domestic election fraud.
2) He did not investigate dead voters.
3) He did not investigate voters with incorrect addresses or missing signatures.
and finally.....
The bombshell....
4) He finally admitted the DOMINION VOTING MACHINES WERE ALL CONNECTED TO THE INTERNET (after denying this for over a month).
Gamble for entertainment, invest for wealth!
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Chris Krebs is getting destroyed today in the live senate hearings. Senator after senator questioning Krebs reveal an utter failure to do his job. Krebs admitted under oath the following.
1) He did not investigate domestic election fraud.
2) He did not investigate dead voters.
3) He did not investigate voters with incorrect addresses or missing signatures.
and finally.....
The bombshell....
4) He finally admitted the DOMINION VOTING MACHINES WERE ALL CONNECTED TO THE INTERNET (after denying this for over a month).
anyone want to bet on the OVER/UNDER on misleading statements in OP's comment.
FFS..... the republicans are dredging up "hunter biden signed "from the entire bush family" on Xmas card to Chinese businessman.
while i have no doubt HB was selling the family name.
1) ZERO evidence he sold access to Joe Biden.
2) Zero evidence that HB and JB discussed Ukraine beyond "how was your trip?"
3) most people take the entire family to mean spouse and kids... i don't usually think of that as the father of a 50 year-old or aunts/uncles.. you can parse the use of "entire"... but who really cares?
4) they can't connect to JB to anything... even given incredibly loose standards.
2
anyone want to bet on the OVER/UNDER on misleading statements in OP's comment.
FFS..... the republicans are dredging up "hunter biden signed "from the entire bush family" on Xmas card to Chinese businessman.
while i have no doubt HB was selling the family name.
1) ZERO evidence he sold access to Joe Biden.
2) Zero evidence that HB and JB discussed Ukraine beyond "how was your trip?"
3) most people take the entire family to mean spouse and kids... i don't usually think of that as the father of a 50 year-old or aunts/uncles.. you can parse the use of "entire"... but who really cares?
4) they can't connect to JB to anything... even given incredibly loose standards.
speak, and only 4,000 people tuned in to hear him give remarks on C-Span live the other day, but yeah— 80 million people were moved to vote for him and if you suspect (obvious) fraud you’re tHrEaTeNiNg dEmOcRAcY.
Do all of the election fraud deniers on covers truly believe Joe Biden received 80M legitimate votes?
speak, and only 4,000 people tuned in to hear him give remarks on C-Span live the other day, but yeah— 80 million people were moved to vote for him and if you suspect (obvious) fraud you’re tHrEaTeNiNg dEmOcRAcY.
Do all of the election fraud deniers on covers truly believe Joe Biden received 80M legitimate votes?
Chris Krebs is getting destroyed today in the live senate hearings. Senator after senator questioning Krebs reveal an utter failure to do his job. Krebs admitted under oath the following. 1) He did not investigate domestic election fraud. 2) He did not investigate dead voters. 3) He did not investigate voters with incorrect addresses or missing signatures. and finally..... The bombshell.... 4) He finally admitted the DOMINION VOTING MACHINES WERE ALL CONNECTED TO THE INTERNET (after denying this for over a month).
You hear what you want to hear...so misleading
1
Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63:
Chris Krebs is getting destroyed today in the live senate hearings. Senator after senator questioning Krebs reveal an utter failure to do his job. Krebs admitted under oath the following. 1) He did not investigate domestic election fraud. 2) He did not investigate dead voters. 3) He did not investigate voters with incorrect addresses or missing signatures. and finally..... The bombshell.... 4) He finally admitted the DOMINION VOTING MACHINES WERE ALL CONNECTED TO THE INTERNET (after denying this for over a month).
Ice. What the hearings today showed was that Chris Krebs did very little, if any, actual investigating into domestic voter fraud. He was, however, confident that no international interference occurred.
The biggest threat is the enemy within.
Gamble for entertainment, invest for wealth!
0
Ice. What the hearings today showed was that Chris Krebs did very little, if any, actual investigating into domestic voter fraud. He was, however, confident that no international interference occurred.
The following beauty is from Candace Owens! No one ever shows up to hear @JoeBiden speak, and only 4,000 people tuned in to hear him give remarks on C-Span live the other day, but yeah— 80 million people were moved to vote for him and if you suspect (obvious) fraud you’re tHrEaTeNiNg dEmOcRAcY. Do all of the election fraud deniers on covers truly believe Joe Biden received 80M legitimate votes?
Candace Owens...
2
Quote Originally Posted by sundance:
The following beauty is from Candace Owens! No one ever shows up to hear @JoeBiden speak, and only 4,000 people tuned in to hear him give remarks on C-Span live the other day, but yeah— 80 million people were moved to vote for him and if you suspect (obvious) fraud you’re tHrEaTeNiNg dEmOcRAcY. Do all of the election fraud deniers on covers truly believe Joe Biden received 80M legitimate votes?
Ice. What the hearings today showed was that Chris Krebs did very little, if any, actual investigating into domestic voter fraud. He was, however, confident that no international interference occurred. The biggest threat is the enemy within.
So today, just a handful of hours after Krebs appeared to answer questions on the Senate floor claiming no international election interference, CBS correspondent Catherine Herridge announces that DNI Radcliffe has confirmed interference in our election by China.
Biden will never take office.
Stay tuned....
Gamble for entertainment, invest for wealth!
0
Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63:
Ice. What the hearings today showed was that Chris Krebs did very little, if any, actual investigating into domestic voter fraud. He was, however, confident that no international interference occurred. The biggest threat is the enemy within.
So today, just a handful of hours after Krebs appeared to answer questions on the Senate floor claiming no international election interference, CBS correspondent Catherine Herridge announces that DNI Radcliffe has confirmed interference in our election by China.
The following beauty is from Candace Owens! No one ever shows up to hear @JoeBiden speak, and only 4,000 people tuned in to hear him give remarks on C-Span live the other day, but yeah— 80 million people were moved to vote for him and if you suspect (obvious) fraud you’re tHrEaTeNiNg dEmOcRAcY. Do all of the election fraud deniers on covers truly believe Joe Biden received 80M legitimate votes?
Yes, it's called the silent majority. Boring Joe isn't worth watching so nobody really wants to bother tuning in but as I pointed out to someone, perhaps Americans wanted boring as opposed to Trump's daily bluster. I'm confident Biden received those votes legitimately since Americans are usually lazy or apathetic about voting. Trump's presidency woke people up and they stopped thinking that one vote doesn't make a difference. Why do you think Trump got so many votes as well? Prior Republican turnout has never been that high. Why is Trump's vote count legitimate and why is Biden's illegitimate? How do I know dead people didn't vote for Trump and that numerous ballots were changed from Biden to Trump? It's the same conjecture you've provided but I have no evidence that the Supreme Court cares about and neither do you.
5
Quote Originally Posted by sundance:
The following beauty is from Candace Owens! No one ever shows up to hear @JoeBiden speak, and only 4,000 people tuned in to hear him give remarks on C-Span live the other day, but yeah— 80 million people were moved to vote for him and if you suspect (obvious) fraud you’re tHrEaTeNiNg dEmOcRAcY. Do all of the election fraud deniers on covers truly believe Joe Biden received 80M legitimate votes?
Yes, it's called the silent majority. Boring Joe isn't worth watching so nobody really wants to bother tuning in but as I pointed out to someone, perhaps Americans wanted boring as opposed to Trump's daily bluster. I'm confident Biden received those votes legitimately since Americans are usually lazy or apathetic about voting. Trump's presidency woke people up and they stopped thinking that one vote doesn't make a difference. Why do you think Trump got so many votes as well? Prior Republican turnout has never been that high. Why is Trump's vote count legitimate and why is Biden's illegitimate? How do I know dead people didn't vote for Trump and that numerous ballots were changed from Biden to Trump? It's the same conjecture you've provided but I have no evidence that the Supreme Court cares about and neither do you.
Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63: Ice. What the hearings today showed was that Chris Krebs did very little, if any, actual investigating into domestic voter fraud. He was, however, confident that no international interference occurred. The biggest threat is the enemy within. So today, just a handful of hours after Krebs appeared to answer questions on the Senate floor claiming no international election interference, CBS correspondent Catherine Herridge announces that DNI Radcliffe has confirmed interference in our election by China. Biden will never take office. Stay tuned....
Biden will be in office 1/20/21...time to move on kid
4
Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63:
Quote Originally Posted by gambleholic63: Ice. What the hearings today showed was that Chris Krebs did very little, if any, actual investigating into domestic voter fraud. He was, however, confident that no international interference occurred. The biggest threat is the enemy within. So today, just a handful of hours after Krebs appeared to answer questions on the Senate floor claiming no international election interference, CBS correspondent Catherine Herridge announces that DNI Radcliffe has confirmed interference in our election by China. Biden will never take office. Stay tuned....
Biden will be in office 1/20/21...time to move on kid
Yes, it's called the silent majority. Boring Joe isn't worth watching so nobody really wants to bother tuning in but as I pointed out to someone, perhaps Americans wanted boring as opposed to Trump's daily bluster. I'm confident Biden received those votes legitimately since Americans are usually lazy or apathetic about voting.
yep . of course the election deniers r still pouting cuz they lost and wetting the bed evry night .
but truth is biden was way ahead in the polls for the past year solid and as fubah kept pointing out biden was also far ahead in approval rating .
it follows logically that if the guy with a horrible approval rating and also way behind in the polls got 75 million votes , then only the dumbest of the stupid would think the guy (joe biden) beating rump in those two critical stats would get LESS votes . then again rumplickers believe in hydroxychloroquine as a cure , the hunter biden laptop conspiracy theory ,the US did not land on the moon , and the earth is flat
"I'm the MOST HONEST HUMAN BEING that God has EVER created!!" - Donald Trump
2
Quote Originally Posted by sicknesscity:
Yes, it's called the silent majority. Boring Joe isn't worth watching so nobody really wants to bother tuning in but as I pointed out to someone, perhaps Americans wanted boring as opposed to Trump's daily bluster. I'm confident Biden received those votes legitimately since Americans are usually lazy or apathetic about voting.
yep . of course the election deniers r still pouting cuz they lost and wetting the bed evry night .
but truth is biden was way ahead in the polls for the past year solid and as fubah kept pointing out biden was also far ahead in approval rating .
it follows logically that if the guy with a horrible approval rating and also way behind in the polls got 75 million votes , then only the dumbest of the stupid would think the guy (joe biden) beating rump in those two critical stats would get LESS votes . then again rumplickers believe in hydroxychloroquine as a cure , the hunter biden laptop conspiracy theory ,the US did not land on the moon , and the earth is flat
yep . of course the election deniers r still pouting cuz they lost and wetting the bed evry night .
but truth is biden was way ahead in the polls for the past year solid and as fubah kept pointing out biden was also far ahead in approval rating .
it follows logically that if the guy with a horrible approval rating and also way behind in the polls got 75 million votes , then only the dumbest of the stupid would think the guy (joe biden) beating rump in those two critical stats would get LESS votes . then again rumplickers believe in hydroxychloroquine as a cure , the hunter biden laptop conspiracy theory ,the US did not land on the moon , and the earth is flat
Great analysis, Kelly. And all true.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KellyM_1964:
yep . of course the election deniers r still pouting cuz they lost and wetting the bed evry night .
but truth is biden was way ahead in the polls for the past year solid and as fubah kept pointing out biden was also far ahead in approval rating .
it follows logically that if the guy with a horrible approval rating and also way behind in the polls got 75 million votes , then only the dumbest of the stupid would think the guy (joe biden) beating rump in those two critical stats would get LESS votes . then again rumplickers believe in hydroxychloroquine as a cure , the hunter biden laptop conspiracy theory ,the US did not land on the moon , and the earth is flat
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.