OBAMA...............0
FORD.................1
CARTER..............1
GEORGE H BUSH..1
CLINTON.............2
GEORGE W BUSH.16
RONALD REAGAN..26
RICHARD NIXON...76
DONALD J TRUMP..215
Anybody see a trend here???
OBAMA...............0
FORD.................1
CARTER..............1
GEORGE H BUSH..1
CLINTON.............2
GEORGE W BUSH.16
RONALD REAGAN..26
RICHARD NIXON...76
DONALD J TRUMP..215
Anybody see a trend here???
OBAMA...............0
FORD.................1
CARTER..............1
GEORGE H BUSH..1
CLINTON.............2
GEORGE W BUSH.16
RONALD REAGAN..26
RICHARD NIXON...76
DONALD J TRUMP..215
Anybody see a trend here???
OBAMA.............0
FORD.................1
CARTER...............1
GEORGE H BUSH..1
CLINTON...............2
GEORGE W BUSH.......16
RONALD REAGAN.........26
RICHARD NIXON.............76
DONALD J TRUMP....215
Anybody see a trend here???
a trend ? from that ?! no I dont
anyone else ?
OBAMA.............0
FORD.................1
CARTER...............1
GEORGE H BUSH..1
CLINTON...............2
GEORGE W BUSH.......16
RONALD REAGAN.........26
RICHARD NIXON.............76
DONALD J TRUMP....215
Anybody see a trend here???
a trend ? from that ?! no I dont
anyone else ?
OBAMA.............0
FORD.................1
CARTER...............1
GEORGE H BUSH..1
CLINTON...............2
GEORGE W BUSH.......16 (republican)
RONALD REAGAN.........26 (republican)
RICHARD NIXON.............76 (republican)
DONALD J TRUMP.... 215 (republican)
Anybody see a trend here???
a trend ? from that ?! no I dont
anyone else ?
I'm still checking sources to see if 215 is correct for the fraud-ridden trump-regime that was wholly supported by republican voters.
I thought it was 216.
OBAMA.............0
FORD.................1
CARTER...............1
GEORGE H BUSH..1
CLINTON...............2
GEORGE W BUSH.......16 (republican)
RONALD REAGAN.........26 (republican)
RICHARD NIXON.............76 (republican)
DONALD J TRUMP.... 215 (republican)
Anybody see a trend here???
a trend ? from that ?! no I dont
anyone else ?
I'm still checking sources to see if 215 is correct for the fraud-ridden trump-regime that was wholly supported by republican voters.
I thought it was 216.
OBAMA.............0
FORD.................1
CARTER...............1
GEORGE H BUSH..1
CLINTON...............2
GEORGE W BUSH.......16 (republican)
RONALD REAGAN.........26 (republican)
RICHARD NIXON.............76 (republican)
DONALD J TRUMP.... 215 (republican)
Anybody see a trend here???
a trend ? from that ?! no I dont
anyone else ?
I'm still checking sources to see if 215 is correct for the fraud-ridden trump-regime that was wholly supported by republican voters.
I thought it was 216.
looks like when u cut & pasted the color scheme gerald ford got accidently colored blue should b red of course since he took over after nixon was forced out in total disgrace
OBAMA.............0
FORD.................1
CARTER...............1
GEORGE H BUSH..1
CLINTON...............2
GEORGE W BUSH.......16 (republican)
RONALD REAGAN.........26 (republican)
RICHARD NIXON.............76 (republican)
DONALD J TRUMP.... 215 (republican)
Anybody see a trend here???
a trend ? from that ?! no I dont
anyone else ?
I'm still checking sources to see if 215 is correct for the fraud-ridden trump-regime that was wholly supported by republican voters.
I thought it was 216.
looks like when u cut & pasted the color scheme gerald ford got accidently colored blue should b red of course since he took over after nixon was forced out in total disgrace
OBAMA.............0
FORD.................1
CARTER...............1
GEORGE H BUSH..1
CLINTON...............2
GEORGE W BUSH.......16 (republican)
RONALD REAGAN.........26 (republican)
RICHARD NIXON.............76 (republican)
DONALD J TRUMP.... 215 (republican)
Anybody see a trend here???
a trend ? from that ?! no I dont
anyone else ?
I'm still checking sources to see if 215 is correct for the fraud-ridden trump-regime that was wholly supported by republican voters.
I thought it was 216.
looks like when u cut & pasted the color scheme gerald ford got accidently colored blue should b red of course since he took over after nixon was forced out in total disgrace
Thanks for that. Prefer to keep things accurate .
OBAMA.............0
FORD.................1
CARTER...............1
GEORGE H BUSH..1
CLINTON...............2
GEORGE W BUSH.......16 (republican)
RONALD REAGAN.........26 (republican)
RICHARD NIXON.............76 (republican)
DONALD J TRUMP.... 215 (republican)
Anybody see a trend here???
a trend ? from that ?! no I dont
anyone else ?
I'm still checking sources to see if 215 is correct for the fraud-ridden trump-regime that was wholly supported by republican voters.
I thought it was 216.
looks like when u cut & pasted the color scheme gerald ford got accidently colored blue should b red of course since he took over after nixon was forced out in total disgrace
Thanks for that. Prefer to keep things accurate .
UPDATE.....FACT CHECK on that viral social media posting, from PolitiFACT:
"The claim is essentially on target for the Democratic presidents. But the comparison to the GOP presidents is overstated, because the numbers of Trump and Nixon administration indictments claimed are exaggerated.
Even so, with a generous count, there were roughly 142 people indicted in the three GOP presidents — far less than 317 (combined), but still far more than the two under the Democrats. "
UPDATE.....FACT CHECK on that viral social media posting, from PolitiFACT:
"The claim is essentially on target for the Democratic presidents. But the comparison to the GOP presidents is overstated, because the numbers of Trump and Nixon administration indictments claimed are exaggerated.
Even so, with a generous count, there were roughly 142 people indicted in the three GOP presidents — far less than 317 (combined), but still far more than the two under the Democrats. "
UPDATE.....FACT CHECK on that viral social media posting, from PolitiFACT: "The claim is essentially on target for the Democratic presidents. But the comparison to the GOP presidents is overstated, because the numbers of Trump and Nixon administration indictments claimed are exaggerated. Even so, with a generous count, there were roughly 142 people indicted in the three GOP presidents — far less than 317 (combined), but still far more than the two under the Democrats. "
good glad we got that cleared up
the politfact checkers are not countiing the criminal indictments of many that were caught up in the trump web of lies and deceit but not actually in his administration per se
still the numbers r stunning !
UPDATE.....FACT CHECK on that viral social media posting, from PolitiFACT: "The claim is essentially on target for the Democratic presidents. But the comparison to the GOP presidents is overstated, because the numbers of Trump and Nixon administration indictments claimed are exaggerated. Even so, with a generous count, there were roughly 142 people indicted in the three GOP presidents — far less than 317 (combined), but still far more than the two under the Democrats. "
good glad we got that cleared up
the politfact checkers are not countiing the criminal indictments of many that were caught up in the trump web of lies and deceit but not actually in his administration per se
still the numbers r stunning !
UPDATE.....FACT CHECK on that viral social media posting, from PolitiFACT: "The claim is essentially on target for the Democratic presidents. But the comparison to the GOP presidents is overstated, because the numbers of Trump and Nixon administration indictments claimed are exaggerated. Even so, with a generous count, there were roughly 142 people indicted in the three GOP presidents — far less than 317 (combined), but still far more than the two under the Democrats. "
good glad we got that cleared up
the politfact checkers are not countiing the criminal indictments of many that were caught up in the trump web of lies and deceit but not actually in his administration per se
still the numbers r stunning !
Of course. Nobody and no source claims to be 100% accurate all of the time. But like "instant replay,the idea is to make the call right upon further review. The story was mostly accurate in the democrat tallies and most importantly making the stark contrast between democrat and republicans administrations -- which was the whole point. *HUGE* contrast (despite being off on specific numbers depending on how the tallies are included or not amidst all the trump fraud/corruption)
Thanks for making that point, Midnight1
UPDATE.....FACT CHECK on that viral social media posting, from PolitiFACT: "The claim is essentially on target for the Democratic presidents. But the comparison to the GOP presidents is overstated, because the numbers of Trump and Nixon administration indictments claimed are exaggerated. Even so, with a generous count, there were roughly 142 people indicted in the three GOP presidents — far less than 317 (combined), but still far more than the two under the Democrats. "
good glad we got that cleared up
the politfact checkers are not countiing the criminal indictments of many that were caught up in the trump web of lies and deceit but not actually in his administration per se
still the numbers r stunning !
Of course. Nobody and no source claims to be 100% accurate all of the time. But like "instant replay,the idea is to make the call right upon further review. The story was mostly accurate in the democrat tallies and most importantly making the stark contrast between democrat and republicans administrations -- which was the whole point. *HUGE* contrast (despite being off on specific numbers depending on how the tallies are included or not amidst all the trump fraud/corruption)
Thanks for making that point, Midnight1
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.