Yes or no?
If so, should he be charged with mishandling classified documents?
Yes and no.
According to the republicans during the Trump disaster, a sitting president cannot be charged.
So that answers the question.
But aside from that precedent set by the republicans, anyone who is not a sitting president, mishandling classified documents or information, should be charged. But of course the penalties will not all be the same based on the merits of each individual case.
The danger is in making a false equivalency and assuming it is all the same thing.
Yes and no.
According to the republicans during the Trump disaster, a sitting president cannot be charged.
So that answers the question.
But aside from that precedent set by the republicans, anyone who is not a sitting president, mishandling classified documents or information, should be charged. But of course the penalties will not all be the same based on the merits of each individual case.
The danger is in making a false equivalency and assuming it is all the same thing.
The real question is Did Biden break the law by TAKING classified documents while NOT a president of the United States. Then kept said documents in various locations, for years, an indication the documents were viewed and not just stored. And then never gave them back until a third party found others at The Biden Penn Center.
With that it was withheld from the public until after the midterm elections. And then, the search for more classified documents dragged on for two months. Only when the last of all these found documents were found was the FBI brought in so that people with the proper clearance could remove the last document. WTF??
Can you say "keystone cops". Bring in the FBI on the last document?
AND WHAT WAS IN JOE BIDEN'S DOCUMENTS? Shhhh, top secret!!!! Now Trump docs had
The real question is Did Biden break the law by TAKING classified documents while NOT a president of the United States. Then kept said documents in various locations, for years, an indication the documents were viewed and not just stored. And then never gave them back until a third party found others at The Biden Penn Center.
With that it was withheld from the public until after the midterm elections. And then, the search for more classified documents dragged on for two months. Only when the last of all these found documents were found was the FBI brought in so that people with the proper clearance could remove the last document. WTF??
Can you say "keystone cops". Bring in the FBI on the last document?
AND WHAT WAS IN JOE BIDEN'S DOCUMENTS? Shhhh, top secret!!!! Now Trump docs had
yep the repos screamed loud and long that no sitting president can be charged
bottom line right there according to the republicans who defended chump
but after he is out of office in 2029 then maybe
in the meantime the criminally indicted sex-offender donnie chump is out of office , lied to the fbi, lied to his lawyers , tried to conceal the whereabouts of classified documents , moved them after getting a subpoena to not move them , and obstructed justice
i think his former vp mike pence is in jeopardy as wellbut not positive there
yep the repos screamed loud and long that no sitting president can be charged
bottom line right there according to the republicans who defended chump
but after he is out of office in 2029 then maybe
in the meantime the criminally indicted sex-offender donnie chump is out of office , lied to the fbi, lied to his lawyers , tried to conceal the whereabouts of classified documents , moved them after getting a subpoena to not move them , and obstructed justice
i think his former vp mike pence is in jeopardy as wellbut not positive there
the repos screamed loud and long that no sitting president can be charged
bottom line right there
according to the republicans who defended chump the indicted sex-offender
the repos screamed loud and long that no sitting president can be charged
bottom line right there
according to the republicans who defended chump the indicted sex-offender
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.