She besmirches the rape victims of her husband... but she is the woman that women should vote for... she is all about women's rights.
She is a freaking mess of a bipolar idiot the entire 8 years in the White House as first lady... documented cocaine addict that went to rehab. A complete disaster.
She served a term as Senator for NY with NOTHING to show for it.
She was Secratary of state and she has a HUGE legacy of blood on her hands and arguably not a single right decision. She armed the Lybian rebels with the weapons used to kill our 4 Americans at at Benghazi. She continues to act as it were nothing after making up a video BS and stepping the way of the rescue attempts. She will NOT talk about this in an honest manner.
She has sold quid=pro=quo favors to foreign heads of state for millions to her corrupt foundation... for which we can tell 10% of funds go to the charity.
She uses an illegal server for her emails to hide all of her illegal activity on these things... and will not give honest testimony and she has others take the 5th.
She has the entire federal government covering her ass right now... the Presidential administration, as well as the DOJ. She needs to have Bill go talk to Loretta Lynch to make sure the necessary delays are in place in the election year.
I am leaving out countless instances of corruption and abuse but in the spirit of making a post readable, I just find this ridiculous
Now this is covers to NOBODY will step in the defend her on these points. They will laugh at me, and deflect to any other subject. THat is the way this works here.
Who wants to defend HRC as a president?
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
She besmirches the rape victims of her husband... but she is the woman that women should vote for... she is all about women's rights.
She is a freaking mess of a bipolar idiot the entire 8 years in the White House as first lady... documented cocaine addict that went to rehab. A complete disaster.
She served a term as Senator for NY with NOTHING to show for it.
She was Secratary of state and she has a HUGE legacy of blood on her hands and arguably not a single right decision. She armed the Lybian rebels with the weapons used to kill our 4 Americans at at Benghazi. She continues to act as it were nothing after making up a video BS and stepping the way of the rescue attempts. She will NOT talk about this in an honest manner.
She has sold quid=pro=quo favors to foreign heads of state for millions to her corrupt foundation... for which we can tell 10% of funds go to the charity.
She uses an illegal server for her emails to hide all of her illegal activity on these things... and will not give honest testimony and she has others take the 5th.
She has the entire federal government covering her ass right now... the Presidential administration, as well as the DOJ. She needs to have Bill go talk to Loretta Lynch to make sure the necessary delays are in place in the election year.
I am leaving out countless instances of corruption and abuse but in the spirit of making a post readable, I just find this ridiculous
Now this is covers to NOBODY will step in the defend her on these points. They will laugh at me, and deflect to any other subject. THat is the way this works here.
She has sold quid=pro=quo favors to foreign heads of state for millions to her corrupt foundation... for which we can tell 10% of funds go to the charity.
According to politifact and factcheck, 89% of funding went to charity. Clinton foundation received an "A" rating from American Institute for philanthropy. Also hard to prove political favors in exchange for foreign donations. Author of book "Clinton cash" made errors in allegations.
0
Quote Originally Posted by SportsFan9698:
She has sold quid=pro=quo favors to foreign heads of state for millions to her corrupt foundation... for which we can tell 10% of funds go to the charity.
According to politifact and factcheck, 89% of funding went to charity. Clinton foundation received an "A" rating from American Institute for philanthropy. Also hard to prove political favors in exchange for foreign donations. Author of book "Clinton cash" made errors in allegations.
According to politifact and factcheck, 89% of funding went to charity. Clinton foundation received an "A" rating from American Institute for philanthropy. Also hard to prove political favors in exchange for foreign donations. Author of book "Clinton cash" made errors in allegations.
I guess you will believe what you want to believe... let me advance the argument. Here is a study with link to back up my statements.
According to politifact and factcheck, 89% of funding went to charity. Clinton foundation received an "A" rating from American Institute for philanthropy. Also hard to prove political favors in exchange for foreign donations. Author of book "Clinton cash" made errors in allegations.
I guess you will believe what you want to believe... let me advance the argument. Here is a study with link to back up my statements.
Federalist article debunked by politifact and factcheck. Incomplete accounting when only grants are counted. Ignored is charity work done directly worldwide by over 2000 employees of Clinton Foundation. Federalist's error is in assuming all spending beyond grants amounted to wasteful overhead.
Nothing illegal about foundations accepting foreign donations. Only candidates for public office are prohibited by law from accepting foreign contributions. No solid evidence of political favors in exchange for money.
0
Federalist article debunked by politifact and factcheck. Incomplete accounting when only grants are counted. Ignored is charity work done directly worldwide by over 2000 employees of Clinton Foundation. Federalist's error is in assuming all spending beyond grants amounted to wasteful overhead.
Nothing illegal about foundations accepting foreign donations. Only candidates for public office are prohibited by law from accepting foreign contributions. No solid evidence of political favors in exchange for money.
According to politifact and factcheck, 89% of funding went to charity. Clinton foundation received an "A" rating from American Institute for philanthropy. Also hard to prove political favors in exchange for foreign donations. Author of book "Clinton cash" made errors in allegations.
Don't rain on sports fans parade with facts from politifact and factcheck.. What his history has shown us on this site is that regardless of reality and facts...
Sportsfan is just going to believe what he wants to believe...
0
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
According to politifact and factcheck, 89% of funding went to charity. Clinton foundation received an "A" rating from American Institute for philanthropy. Also hard to prove political favors in exchange for foreign donations. Author of book "Clinton cash" made errors in allegations.
Don't rain on sports fans parade with facts from politifact and factcheck.. What his history has shown us on this site is that regardless of reality and facts...
Sportsfan is just going to believe what he wants to believe...
We know how desperate the cash poor Trump campaign is to raise funds. But none one ever expected that it would be so bad that Trump would steal from his own charity. Sources report that Trump used $12,000 of charity money to make a personal purchase. And not just any personal purchase. Trump spent the money to buy a football helmet and jersey signed by Tim Tebow from the Denver Broncos.
0
We know how desperate the cash poor Trump campaign is to raise funds. But none one ever expected that it would be so bad that Trump would steal from his own charity. Sources report that Trump used $12,000 of charity money to make a personal purchase. And not just any personal purchase. Trump spent the money to buy a football helmet and jersey signed by Tim Tebow from the Denver Broncos.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.