Huma Abedin Emails Show Clinton Foundation Donor Demands on State Department
(Washington DC) – Judicial Watch today released 296 pages of State Department records, of which 44
email exchanges were not previously turned over to the State
Department, bringing the known total to date to 171 of new Clinton
emails (not part of the 55,000 pages of emails that Clinton turned over
to the State Department). These records further appear to contradict
statements by Clinton that, “as far as she knew,” all of her government
emails were turned over to the State Department
The new documents reveal that in April 2009 controversial Clinton Foundation official Doug Band
pushed for a job for an associate. In the email Band tells Hillary
Clinton’s former aides at the State Department Cheryl Mills and Huma
Abedin that it is “important to take care of [Redacted]. Band is
reassured by Abedin that “Personnel has been sending him options.” Band
was co-founder of Teneo Strategy with Bill Clinton and a top official of the Clinton Foundation, including its Clinton Global Initiative.
Included in the new document production is a 2009 email in which
Band, directs Abedin and Mills to put Lebanese-Nigerian billionaire and
Clinton Foundation donor Gilbert Chagoury
in touch with the State Department’s “substance person” on Lebanon.
Band notes that Chagoury is “key guy there [Lebanon] and to us,” and
insists that Abedin call Amb. Jeffrey Feltman to connect him to
Chagoury.
Chagoury
is a close friend of former President Bill Clinton and a top donor to
the Clinton Foundation. He has appeared near the top of the Foundation’s
donor list as a $1 million to $5 million contributor, according to
foundation documents. He also pledged $1 billion to the Clinton Global Initiative. According to a 2010 investigation by PBS Frontline, Chagoury was convicted
in 2000 in Switzerland for laundering money from Nigeria, but agreed to
a plea deal and repaid $66 million to the Nigerian government.
What else could you expect from this Lying POS HRC!!!
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Huma Abedin Emails Show Clinton Foundation Donor Demands on State Department
(Washington DC) – Judicial Watch today released 296 pages of State Department records, of which 44
email exchanges were not previously turned over to the State
Department, bringing the known total to date to 171 of new Clinton
emails (not part of the 55,000 pages of emails that Clinton turned over
to the State Department). These records further appear to contradict
statements by Clinton that, “as far as she knew,” all of her government
emails were turned over to the State Department
The new documents reveal that in April 2009 controversial Clinton Foundation official Doug Band
pushed for a job for an associate. In the email Band tells Hillary
Clinton’s former aides at the State Department Cheryl Mills and Huma
Abedin that it is “important to take care of [Redacted]. Band is
reassured by Abedin that “Personnel has been sending him options.” Band
was co-founder of Teneo Strategy with Bill Clinton and a top official of the Clinton Foundation, including its Clinton Global Initiative.
Included in the new document production is a 2009 email in which
Band, directs Abedin and Mills to put Lebanese-Nigerian billionaire and
Clinton Foundation donor Gilbert Chagoury
in touch with the State Department’s “substance person” on Lebanon.
Band notes that Chagoury is “key guy there [Lebanon] and to us,” and
insists that Abedin call Amb. Jeffrey Feltman to connect him to
Chagoury.
Chagoury
is a close friend of former President Bill Clinton and a top donor to
the Clinton Foundation. He has appeared near the top of the Foundation’s
donor list as a $1 million to $5 million contributor, according to
foundation documents. He also pledged $1 billion to the Clinton Global Initiative. According to a 2010 investigation by PBS Frontline, Chagoury was convicted
in 2000 in Switzerland for laundering money from Nigeria, but agreed to
a plea deal and repaid $66 million to the Nigerian government.
This is a very big deal. I mean it certainly isn't a new idea...we always knew she was into this kind of thing.
The reason why it is a big deal is that it is obvious proof that she had nefarious intentions for setting up her home brew server in the first place.
The second reason it is a big deal is because it allows the low information voters that still defend HRC to this day like BWS77 and darkdonkey12 to see that they have no cover left to hide behind.
WHEN Hillary gets elected we can say a big fuggin I told you so when these types of stories bombard us well into her presidency. She will certainly replace Obama as the worst president in American history.
Furthermore, the fact that she will be elected in spite of this kind knowledge being out there for so long will be absolute proof that the Democrats have zero integrity WHATSOEVER.
And for the record...I won't even bring up anything about her husband and his conscious efforts to undermine the sanctity of the White House.
In HRC's speech at the DNC, she made mention to a discussion that she and Bill had 40+ years ago that from the context, suggested that they both had Presidential aspirations for the sake of their bucket list and not for wanting to truly make a net positive difference.
Over our history. we've seen the Democrats elect some shady characters. Both parties do. The difference mainly being that once a Republican shows his/her shenanigans, they are very likely to get replaced. Whereas the Democrats have the attitude that if they can waste money and give the minorities just enough to keep them voting for them and keep them from standing up, it won't matter what shenanigans they are guilty of.
I'm very proud that my party was responsible for the Emancipation Proclamation. I'm also very proud that more Republicans voted for the 1964 Civil Rights act than the Democrats. Very proud that it wasn't a Republican that uttered the phrase "We'll keep them _____ voting Democratic for the next 200 years"
The party that championed the ideas of Margaret Sanger in the past, present and future is not my party.
Also proud that the GOP represents personal responsibility and lifts people up by trying to teach them how to fish instead of handing them a fish that someone else caught every day. It may not be the reality 100%, but the idea is sound.
How anyone can be for the party that represents the opposite of that I cannot fathom.
0
This is a very big deal. I mean it certainly isn't a new idea...we always knew she was into this kind of thing.
The reason why it is a big deal is that it is obvious proof that she had nefarious intentions for setting up her home brew server in the first place.
The second reason it is a big deal is because it allows the low information voters that still defend HRC to this day like BWS77 and darkdonkey12 to see that they have no cover left to hide behind.
WHEN Hillary gets elected we can say a big fuggin I told you so when these types of stories bombard us well into her presidency. She will certainly replace Obama as the worst president in American history.
Furthermore, the fact that she will be elected in spite of this kind knowledge being out there for so long will be absolute proof that the Democrats have zero integrity WHATSOEVER.
And for the record...I won't even bring up anything about her husband and his conscious efforts to undermine the sanctity of the White House.
In HRC's speech at the DNC, she made mention to a discussion that she and Bill had 40+ years ago that from the context, suggested that they both had Presidential aspirations for the sake of their bucket list and not for wanting to truly make a net positive difference.
Over our history. we've seen the Democrats elect some shady characters. Both parties do. The difference mainly being that once a Republican shows his/her shenanigans, they are very likely to get replaced. Whereas the Democrats have the attitude that if they can waste money and give the minorities just enough to keep them voting for them and keep them from standing up, it won't matter what shenanigans they are guilty of.
I'm very proud that my party was responsible for the Emancipation Proclamation. I'm also very proud that more Republicans voted for the 1964 Civil Rights act than the Democrats. Very proud that it wasn't a Republican that uttered the phrase "We'll keep them _____ voting Democratic for the next 200 years"
The party that championed the ideas of Margaret Sanger in the past, present and future is not my party.
Also proud that the GOP represents personal responsibility and lifts people up by trying to teach them how to fish instead of handing them a fish that someone else caught every day. It may not be the reality 100%, but the idea is sound.
How anyone can be for the party that represents the opposite of that I cannot fathom.
This is a very big deal. I mean it certainly isn't a new idea...we always knew she was into this kind of thing.
The reason why it is a big deal is that it is obvious proof that she had nefarious intentions for setting up her home brew server in the first place.
The second reason it is a big deal is because it allows the low information voters that still defend HRC to this day like BWS77 and darkdonkey12 to see that they have no cover left to hide behind.
WHEN Hillary gets elected we can say a big fuggin I told you so when these types of stories bombard us well into her presidency. She will certainly replace Obama as the worst president in American history.
Furthermore, the fact that she will be elected in spite of this kind knowledge being out there for so long will be absolute proof that the Democrats have zero integrity WHATSOEVER.
And for the record...I won't even bring up anything about her husband and his conscious efforts to undermine the sanctity of the White House.
In HRC's speech at the DNC, she made mention to a discussion that she and Bill had 40+ years ago that from the context, suggested that they both had Presidential aspirations for the sake of their bucket list and not for wanting to truly make a net positive difference.
Over our history. we've seen the Democrats elect some shady characters. Both parties do. The difference mainly being that once a Republican shows his/her shenanigans, they are very likely to get replaced. Whereas the Democrats have the attitude that if they can waste money and give the minorities just enough to keep them voting for them and keep them from standing up, it won't matter what shenanigans they are guilty of.
I'm very proud that my party was responsible for the Emancipation Proclamation. I'm also very proud that more Republicans voted for the 1964 Civil Rights act than the Democrats. Very proud that it wasn't a Republican that uttered the phrase "We'll keep them _____ voting Democratic for the next 200 years"
The party that championed the ideas of Margaret Sanger in the past, present and future is not my party.
Also proud that the GOP represents personal responsibility and lifts people up by trying to teach them how to fish instead of handing them a fish that someone else caught every day. It may not be the reality 100%, but the idea is sound.
How anyone can be for the party that represents the opposite of that I cannot fathom.
0
Quote Originally Posted by bowlslit:
This is a very big deal. I mean it certainly isn't a new idea...we always knew she was into this kind of thing.
The reason why it is a big deal is that it is obvious proof that she had nefarious intentions for setting up her home brew server in the first place.
The second reason it is a big deal is because it allows the low information voters that still defend HRC to this day like BWS77 and darkdonkey12 to see that they have no cover left to hide behind.
WHEN Hillary gets elected we can say a big fuggin I told you so when these types of stories bombard us well into her presidency. She will certainly replace Obama as the worst president in American history.
Furthermore, the fact that she will be elected in spite of this kind knowledge being out there for so long will be absolute proof that the Democrats have zero integrity WHATSOEVER.
And for the record...I won't even bring up anything about her husband and his conscious efforts to undermine the sanctity of the White House.
In HRC's speech at the DNC, she made mention to a discussion that she and Bill had 40+ years ago that from the context, suggested that they both had Presidential aspirations for the sake of their bucket list and not for wanting to truly make a net positive difference.
Over our history. we've seen the Democrats elect some shady characters. Both parties do. The difference mainly being that once a Republican shows his/her shenanigans, they are very likely to get replaced. Whereas the Democrats have the attitude that if they can waste money and give the minorities just enough to keep them voting for them and keep them from standing up, it won't matter what shenanigans they are guilty of.
I'm very proud that my party was responsible for the Emancipation Proclamation. I'm also very proud that more Republicans voted for the 1964 Civil Rights act than the Democrats. Very proud that it wasn't a Republican that uttered the phrase "We'll keep them _____ voting Democratic for the next 200 years"
The party that championed the ideas of Margaret Sanger in the past, present and future is not my party.
Also proud that the GOP represents personal responsibility and lifts people up by trying to teach them how to fish instead of handing them a fish that someone else caught every day. It may not be the reality 100%, but the idea is sound.
How anyone can be for the party that represents the opposite of that I cannot fathom.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Hot Forum Topics
