President Obama attempted to turn his Saturday White House weekly address into a subtle dig at Donald Trump, but Obama was the one who ended up with egg on his face.
The president made reference to the 15th anniversary of the 9/11
terror attack, and claimed that we as a nation shouldn’t respond
positively to divisive people.
“In the face of terrorism, how we respond matters,” he said at about
the 2:45 mark. “We cannot give in to those who would divide us. We
cannot react in ways that erode the fabric of our society. Because it’s
our diversity, our welcoming of all talent, our treating of everybody
fairly — no matter their race, gender, ethnicity, or faith — that’s part
of what makes our country great.”
“We cannot give in to those who would divide us”?
Although Americans felt that greater racial harmony would result from
the election of the first African-American president, just the opposite
occurred. In September 4, 2015, Rasmussen Reports conducted a survey and found:
Only 20% of Likely U.S. Voters believe President Obama
has brought Americans of different races closer together, according to a
new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey. Forty-seven percent
(47%) think Obama has driven those of different races further apart
instead. Twenty-seven percent (27%) say his words and actions have had
no major impact either way.
As for the president himself, Gallup reported in February of 2015 that Obama is the most polarizing president in modern history.
Throughout President Barack Obama’s sixth full year in
office, an average of 79% of Democrats, compared with 9% of Republicans,
approved of the job he was doing. That 70-percentage-point party gap in
approval ratings ties for the fifth-most-polarized year for a president
in Gallup records dating back to 1953.
Gallup reported that Obama ranked among the 10 most divisive
presidents in the last 60 years during his then-six years in office.
Satan himself couldn't have done a better job of destroying the country than Obama
Like I said before, Obama is the worst President we have had.
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
President Obama attempted to turn his Saturday White House weekly address into a subtle dig at Donald Trump, but Obama was the one who ended up with egg on his face.
The president made reference to the 15th anniversary of the 9/11
terror attack, and claimed that we as a nation shouldn’t respond
positively to divisive people.
“In the face of terrorism, how we respond matters,” he said at about
the 2:45 mark. “We cannot give in to those who would divide us. We
cannot react in ways that erode the fabric of our society. Because it’s
our diversity, our welcoming of all talent, our treating of everybody
fairly — no matter their race, gender, ethnicity, or faith — that’s part
of what makes our country great.”
“We cannot give in to those who would divide us”?
Although Americans felt that greater racial harmony would result from
the election of the first African-American president, just the opposite
occurred. In September 4, 2015, Rasmussen Reports conducted a survey and found:
Only 20% of Likely U.S. Voters believe President Obama
has brought Americans of different races closer together, according to a
new Rasmussen Reports national telephone survey. Forty-seven percent
(47%) think Obama has driven those of different races further apart
instead. Twenty-seven percent (27%) say his words and actions have had
no major impact either way.
As for the president himself, Gallup reported in February of 2015 that Obama is the most polarizing president in modern history.
Throughout President Barack Obama’s sixth full year in
office, an average of 79% of Democrats, compared with 9% of Republicans,
approved of the job he was doing. That 70-percentage-point party gap in
approval ratings ties for the fifth-most-polarized year for a president
in Gallup records dating back to 1953.
Gallup reported that Obama ranked among the 10 most divisive
presidents in the last 60 years during his then-six years in office.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.