It’s been over a year since the WHO declared the coronavirus a pandemic after originally downplaying the threat. It is no secret that both the disease and the response to combat it following this SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in late 2019 have turned our world upside-down. Mandates, lockdowns, and guidelines seem to change every time Dr. Fauci opens his mouth. All of these unprecedented rules were put into place, we were told, to slow down the spread of a disease that today is linked to the death of over half a million Americans and 3.7 million global citizens in the last year.
Cardiologist and Professor of Medicine Peter McCullough testified in Texas earlier this year. Dr. McCullough sees COVID patients and says 85% of COVID patients given multi-drug treatment plan recover from the disease with complete immunity. McCullough added, “The pandemic could have been over by now, he says, if those who tested positive for covid had been immediately treated before they fell ill enough to be hospitalized. He also says that thousands could have been, and still could be saved if the treatment protocol he and other physicians use were not suppressed.”
Dr. Fauci and the CDC and WHO suppressed this effective treatment plan and others.
The e-mails also showed that Fauci was more in the loop than he let on concerning some of the Trump administration’s proposed treatment solutions.
He notoriously second-guessed then-President Donald Trump during a press conference statement about the benefits of using hydroxychloroquine.
Fauci refuted President Trump in a White House press conference on March 25:
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
It’s been over a year since the WHO declared the coronavirus a pandemic after originally downplaying the threat. It is no secret that both the disease and the response to combat it following this SARS-CoV-2 outbreak in late 2019 have turned our world upside-down. Mandates, lockdowns, and guidelines seem to change every time Dr. Fauci opens his mouth. All of these unprecedented rules were put into place, we were told, to slow down the spread of a disease that today is linked to the death of over half a million Americans and 3.7 million global citizens in the last year.
Cardiologist and Professor of Medicine Peter McCullough testified in Texas earlier this year. Dr. McCullough sees COVID patients and says 85% of COVID patients given multi-drug treatment plan recover from the disease with complete immunity. McCullough added, “The pandemic could have been over by now, he says, if those who tested positive for covid had been immediately treated before they fell ill enough to be hospitalized. He also says that thousands could have been, and still could be saved if the treatment protocol he and other physicians use were not suppressed.”
Dr. Fauci and the CDC and WHO suppressed this effective treatment plan and others.
The e-mails also showed that Fauci was more in the loop than he let on concerning some of the Trump administration’s proposed treatment solutions.
He notoriously second-guessed then-President Donald Trump during a press conference statement about the benefits of using hydroxychloroquine.
Fauci refuted President Trump in a White House press conference on March 25:
Scientific consensus rejects hydroxychloroquine as covid treatment. In 2020, many countries experimented with different drugs that have proven to be ineffective in treating coronavirus. According to lancet, reports from large clinical trials conclude hydroxychloroquine isn't beneficial for covid patients requiring hospitalization. Prevention effectiveness is uncertain but unlikely since drug isn't therapeutic. Cochrane review found that hydroxychloroquine doesn't reduce covid death rate or number of patients who need mechanical ventilation. Food drug administration revokes emergency authorization of hydroxychloroquine. No longer reasonable to believe that the drug is effective against coronavirus or that benefits outweigh risks. Also National institute of health recommends against use of hydroxychloroquine.
7
Scientific consensus rejects hydroxychloroquine as covid treatment. In 2020, many countries experimented with different drugs that have proven to be ineffective in treating coronavirus. According to lancet, reports from large clinical trials conclude hydroxychloroquine isn't beneficial for covid patients requiring hospitalization. Prevention effectiveness is uncertain but unlikely since drug isn't therapeutic. Cochrane review found that hydroxychloroquine doesn't reduce covid death rate or number of patients who need mechanical ventilation. Food drug administration revokes emergency authorization of hydroxychloroquine. No longer reasonable to believe that the drug is effective against coronavirus or that benefits outweigh risks. Also National institute of health recommends against use of hydroxychloroquine.
The FDA is aware of reports of serious heart rhythm problems in patients with COVID-19 treated with hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine, often in combination with azithromycin and other QT prolonging medicines. We are also aware of increased use of these medicines through outpatient prescriptions. Therefore, we would like to remind health care professionals and patients of the known risks associated with both hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine. We will continue to investigate risks associated with the use of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine for COVID-19 and communicate publicly when we have more information.
Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine can cause abnormal heart rhythms such as QT interval prolongation and a dangerously rapid heart rate called ventricular tachycardia. These risks may increase when these medicines are combined with other medicines known to prolong the QT interval, including the antibiotic azithromycin, which is also being used in some COVID-19 patients without FDA approval for this condition. Patients who also have other health issues such as heart and kidney disease are likely to be at increased risk of these heart problems when receiving these medicines.
The FDA is aware of reports of serious heart rhythm problems in patients with COVID-19 treated with hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine, often in combination with azithromycin and other QT prolonging medicines. We are also aware of increased use of these medicines through outpatient prescriptions. Therefore, we would like to remind health care professionals and patients of the known risks associated with both hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine. We will continue to investigate risks associated with the use of hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine for COVID-19 and communicate publicly when we have more information.
Hydroxychloroquine and chloroquine can cause abnormal heart rhythms such as QT interval prolongation and a dangerously rapid heart rate called ventricular tachycardia. These risks may increase when these medicines are combined with other medicines known to prolong the QT interval, including the antibiotic azithromycin, which is also being used in some COVID-19 patients without FDA approval for this condition. Patients who also have other health issues such as heart and kidney disease are likely to be at increased risk of these heart problems when receiving these medicines.
If you’ve recently been diagnosed with COVID-19, you may have a treatment option: bamlanivimab (bam-la-NIV-i-mab) and etesevimab (e-te-SEV-i-mab), administered together. The research so far shows that for certain people, this treatment option may help limit the amount of virus in the body. This may help their symptoms improve sooner — and they may be less likely to need to go to the hospital. But bamlanivimab and etesevimab administered together is a treatment option that’s still being studied, so there’s a lot that scientists don’t know about the benefits and risks.
Here, you'll learn about COVID-19 and this treatment — including its possible benefits and side effects. Together, you and your healthcare provider can decide if this treatment is an option for you.
Bamlanivimab and etesevimab are investigational medicines used together to treat mild to moderate symptoms of COVID-19 in adults and adolescents (12 years of age or older who weigh at least 88 pounds [40 kg]), and who are at high risk for developing severe COVID-19 symptoms or the need for hospitalization
0
Drug approved to treat covid.
If you’ve recently been diagnosed with COVID-19, you may have a treatment option: bamlanivimab (bam-la-NIV-i-mab) and etesevimab (e-te-SEV-i-mab), administered together. The research so far shows that for certain people, this treatment option may help limit the amount of virus in the body. This may help their symptoms improve sooner — and they may be less likely to need to go to the hospital. But bamlanivimab and etesevimab administered together is a treatment option that’s still being studied, so there’s a lot that scientists don’t know about the benefits and risks.
Here, you'll learn about COVID-19 and this treatment — including its possible benefits and side effects. Together, you and your healthcare provider can decide if this treatment is an option for you.
Bamlanivimab and etesevimab are investigational medicines used together to treat mild to moderate symptoms of COVID-19 in adults and adolescents (12 years of age or older who weigh at least 88 pounds [40 kg]), and who are at high risk for developing severe COVID-19 symptoms or the need for hospitalization
What drug The traitor got right and what he personally used when he was infected.
Immune-based therapy. Researchers study the use of a type of immune-based therapy called convalescent plasma. The has granted emergency use authorization for convalescent plasma therapy to treat . Convalescent plasma is blood donated by people who've recovered from . Convalescent plasma with high antibodies may be used to treat some hospitalized people ill with who are either early in their illness or who have weakened immune systems.
Researchers also study other immune-based therapies, including mesenchymal stem cells and monoclonal antibodies. Monoclonal antibodies are proteins created in a lab that can help the immune system fight off viruses. Several monoclonal antibody medications are available. These include a combination of bamlanivimab and etesevimab, a combination of two antibodies called casirivimab and imdevimab, and sotrovimab. These drugs are used to treat mild to moderate in people who have a higher risk of developing serious illness due to . Treatment consists of a single intravenous infusion given in an outpatient setting. To be most effective, these medications need to be given soon after symptoms start and prior to hospitalization.
This pushes antibodies from a recovery patients plasma into an infected patient to boost immunity and fight off the infection.
0
What drug The traitor got right and what he personally used when he was infected.
Immune-based therapy. Researchers study the use of a type of immune-based therapy called convalescent plasma. The has granted emergency use authorization for convalescent plasma therapy to treat . Convalescent plasma is blood donated by people who've recovered from . Convalescent plasma with high antibodies may be used to treat some hospitalized people ill with who are either early in their illness or who have weakened immune systems.
Researchers also study other immune-based therapies, including mesenchymal stem cells and monoclonal antibodies. Monoclonal antibodies are proteins created in a lab that can help the immune system fight off viruses. Several monoclonal antibody medications are available. These include a combination of bamlanivimab and etesevimab, a combination of two antibodies called casirivimab and imdevimab, and sotrovimab. These drugs are used to treat mild to moderate in people who have a higher risk of developing serious illness due to . Treatment consists of a single intravenous infusion given in an outpatient setting. To be most effective, these medications need to be given soon after symptoms start and prior to hospitalization.
This pushes antibodies from a recovery patients plasma into an infected patient to boost immunity and fight off the infection.
Scientific consensus rejects hydroxychloroquine as covid treatment. In 2020, many countries experimented with different drugs that have proven to be ineffective in treating coronavirus. According to lancet, reports from large clinical trials conclude hydroxychloroquine isn't beneficial for covid patients requiring hospitalization. Prevention effectiveness is uncertain but unlikely since drug isn't therapeutic. Cochrane review found that hydroxychloroquine doesn't reduce covid death rate or number of patients who need mechanical ventilation. Food drug administration revokes emergency authorization of hydroxychloroquine. No longer reasonable to believe that the drug is effective against coronavirus or that benefits outweigh risks. Also National institute of health recommends against use of hydroxychloroquine.
Quoting the OP; "... if those who tested positive for covid had been immediately treated before they fell ill enough to be hospitalized. "
And then you submit statements that talk only of hospitalized and on ventilators. Off topic my friend. We all know that Europe experimented with the already dying in hospitals and gave them massive doses.
From Lupus.org; "Given the drug’s many and varied beneficial effects and its excellent long-standing safety profile, most rheumatologists believe that hydroxychloroquine should be taken by people with lupus throughout their lifetime."
Scientific consensus rejects hydroxychloroquine as covid treatment. In 2020, many countries experimented with different drugs that have proven to be ineffective in treating coronavirus. According to lancet, reports from large clinical trials conclude hydroxychloroquine isn't beneficial for covid patients requiring hospitalization. Prevention effectiveness is uncertain but unlikely since drug isn't therapeutic. Cochrane review found that hydroxychloroquine doesn't reduce covid death rate or number of patients who need mechanical ventilation. Food drug administration revokes emergency authorization of hydroxychloroquine. No longer reasonable to believe that the drug is effective against coronavirus or that benefits outweigh risks. Also National institute of health recommends against use of hydroxychloroquine.
Quoting the OP; "... if those who tested positive for covid had been immediately treated before they fell ill enough to be hospitalized. "
And then you submit statements that talk only of hospitalized and on ventilators. Off topic my friend. We all know that Europe experimented with the already dying in hospitals and gave them massive doses.
From Lupus.org; "Given the drug’s many and varied beneficial effects and its excellent long-standing safety profile, most rheumatologists believe that hydroxychloroquine should be taken by people with lupus throughout their lifetime."
So last year, if you publicly questioned the origin of the virus, whether or not it might be airborne, whether or not six foot spacing was any more effective than three, whether or not the virus actually spread through contact with surfaces, or even if it was less likely to be spread outside, media platforms like twitter and facebook would turn off your accounts, unilaterally silence you, all in the name of 'speaking with one voice'. Well, as it's turned out, that one voice they claimed to be preserving, was a false voice. Wrong on just about everything. Yet the marionettes of censorship paid no price for their actions. They go on as before, if anything more emboldened iwhen it comes to silencing voices that question their orthidoxy.
This is not the America any of us should want.
0
So last year, if you publicly questioned the origin of the virus, whether or not it might be airborne, whether or not six foot spacing was any more effective than three, whether or not the virus actually spread through contact with surfaces, or even if it was less likely to be spread outside, media platforms like twitter and facebook would turn off your accounts, unilaterally silence you, all in the name of 'speaking with one voice'. Well, as it's turned out, that one voice they claimed to be preserving, was a false voice. Wrong on just about everything. Yet the marionettes of censorship paid no price for their actions. They go on as before, if anything more emboldened iwhen it comes to silencing voices that question their orthidoxy.
Yes raiders, sir anyone who questioned the official white house statement is under investigation, gaetz they got a past to now lie under the witness stand margerie green is ostrizized rand Paul is a rube from lection,
To be honest been waiting for you to chime in... raiders22.
Deep state being what they are.... sooo....
Isn't that the official statement from intelligence...
0
Yes raiders, sir anyone who questioned the official white house statement is under investigation, gaetz they got a past to now lie under the witness stand margerie green is ostrizized rand Paul is a rube from lection,
To be honest been waiting for you to chime in... raiders22.
Deep state being what they are.... sooo....
Isn't that the official statement from intelligence...
That like Ebola originated from bats who eat fruit? So one turned carnivorous bitten a few humans and surprise surprise sarge (best gomer i got ) they worked for the wuhan viral institutes.
3 wuhan viral techs were among the first known group of covid positive cases. In November of 2019,
The timeline is that after these workers fell ill the wuhan viral institutes of health and human services found the genome pattern and with the help of Microsoft came up with a vaccine.
Meantime moderna launching mrna technology from an Amazon platform to disrupt viral infections was given the genome sequence in December and FAUCCI gave a speech admitting if they had quarantined before the first cluster mutant variants emerged they could of prevented a world out break.
Mrna technology went to Chicago university study and Pfizer began to assemble it's own vaccine. The competing firms found themselves in court and court ruled no Patten was needed to assimilate this, simplistic terms Pfizer does not have to pay moderna in royalties.
It's quite a paradox.
0
That like Ebola originated from bats who eat fruit? So one turned carnivorous bitten a few humans and surprise surprise sarge (best gomer i got ) they worked for the wuhan viral institutes.
3 wuhan viral techs were among the first known group of covid positive cases. In November of 2019,
The timeline is that after these workers fell ill the wuhan viral institutes of health and human services found the genome pattern and with the help of Microsoft came up with a vaccine.
Meantime moderna launching mrna technology from an Amazon platform to disrupt viral infections was given the genome sequence in December and FAUCCI gave a speech admitting if they had quarantined before the first cluster mutant variants emerged they could of prevented a world out break.
Mrna technology went to Chicago university study and Pfizer began to assemble it's own vaccine. The competing firms found themselves in court and court ruled no Patten was needed to assimilate this, simplistic terms Pfizer does not have to pay moderna in royalties.
Not much reason to chime in really — folks gonna believe what they want to believe.
But amazing to me when there is evidence for something else or doubt on what they have been led to believe — people are still not open minded enough. Simply follow the narrative.
0
Nature —
Happy late Birthday to you.
Not much reason to chime in really — folks gonna believe what they want to believe.
But amazing to me when there is evidence for something else or doubt on what they have been led to believe — people are still not open minded enough. Simply follow the narrative.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.