A federal judge said Wednesday he may order Democratic presidential
front-runner Hillary Clinton to testify under oath about whether she
used a private email server as secretary of state to evade public
records disclosures.
U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan signed an
order granting a request from the conservative legal advocacy group
Judicial Watch to question six current and former State Department
staffers about the creation and purpose of the private email system.
Those on the list were some of Clinton's closest aides during her tenure
as the nation's top diplomat, including former chief of staff Cheryl D.
Mills, deputy chief of staff Huma Abedin and undersecretary Patrick F.
Kennedy.
Also set to testify is Bryan Pagliano, the agency
employee who was tasked with setting up the clintonemail.com server
located in the basement of the New York home Clinton shares with her
husband, former President Bill Clinton. Pagliano has previously refused
to testify before Congress, citing his Fifth Amendment right against
self-incrimination.
Based on what might be gleaned in those interviews,
which are to be conducted over the next eight weeks, Sullivan says in
his order a sworn deposition from Hillary Clinton "may be necessary."
That raises the possibility that Clinton could be
ordered to testify in the midst of the presidential race. A campaign
spokesman did not respond Wednesday to messages about whether Clinton
would oppose any order to testify.
Trump won't give Hillary a pass on the emails like Sanders did.
This could be very interesting!!!
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
A federal judge said Wednesday he may order Democratic presidential
front-runner Hillary Clinton to testify under oath about whether she
used a private email server as secretary of state to evade public
records disclosures.
U.S. District Court Judge Emmet G. Sullivan signed an
order granting a request from the conservative legal advocacy group
Judicial Watch to question six current and former State Department
staffers about the creation and purpose of the private email system.
Those on the list were some of Clinton's closest aides during her tenure
as the nation's top diplomat, including former chief of staff Cheryl D.
Mills, deputy chief of staff Huma Abedin and undersecretary Patrick F.
Kennedy.
Also set to testify is Bryan Pagliano, the agency
employee who was tasked with setting up the clintonemail.com server
located in the basement of the New York home Clinton shares with her
husband, former President Bill Clinton. Pagliano has previously refused
to testify before Congress, citing his Fifth Amendment right against
self-incrimination.
Based on what might be gleaned in those interviews,
which are to be conducted over the next eight weeks, Sullivan says in
his order a sworn deposition from Hillary Clinton "may be necessary."
That raises the possibility that Clinton could be
ordered to testify in the midst of the presidential race. A campaign
spokesman did not respond Wednesday to messages about whether Clinton
would oppose any order to testify.
Hillary's far left ideology goes
back to her college days. She was a follower of Saul Alinsky, a community
organizer and a self-proclaimed Marxist. Hillary did her college thesis on
Alinsky, and he was so impressed with her that he offered her a job as his
assistant. Instead, she married Bill Clinton and they went into politics.
However, she maintained her friendship with Alinsky for years until he died.
Hillary's comment about companies not creating jobs is a direct reflection of her Marxist ideology.
By the way, Alinksky wrote 'Rules for
Radicals,' a book on community organizing. Obama also is an admirer of Alinsky, and
taught his methods back in Chicago before becoming a state senator. Obama
and Hillary are cut from the same political cloth.
Hillary's far left ideology goes
back to her college days. She was a follower of Saul Alinsky, a community
organizer and a self-proclaimed Marxist. Hillary did her college thesis on
Alinsky, and he was so impressed with her that he offered her a job as his
assistant. Instead, she married Bill Clinton and they went into politics.
However, she maintained her friendship with Alinsky for years until he died.
Hillary's comment about companies not creating jobs is a direct reflection of her Marxist ideology.
By the way, Alinksky wrote 'Rules for
Radicals,' a book on community organizing. Obama also is an admirer of Alinsky, and
taught his methods back in Chicago before becoming a state senator. Obama
and Hillary are cut from the same political cloth.
In this case, the key is that the FBI found zero evidence that Clinton broke the law or jeopardized national security according to Washington Post and PoliticusUSA. Eventually, Clinton is likely to be cleared of criminal wrongdoing. Besides, public doesn't seem to care much about this phony scandal.
0
In this case, the key is that the FBI found zero evidence that Clinton broke the law or jeopardized national security according to Washington Post and PoliticusUSA. Eventually, Clinton is likely to be cleared of criminal wrongdoing. Besides, public doesn't seem to care much about this phony scandal.
In this case, the key is that the FBI found zero evidence that Clinton broke the law or jeopardized national security according to Washington Post and PoliticusUSA. Eventually, Clinton is likely to be cleared of criminal wrongdoing. Besides, public doesn't seem to care much about this phony scandal.
The sheep will not care one bit as you say.
Those that are informed should care with every fiber....
Which are you?
Do you really believe that HRC didn't purposely set up the account so that she could avoid scrutiny?
Of course she did. She was ultra naive for thinking she could get away with it and ultra naive for thinking that Secret Service could protect the servers by standing guard at the front and back gate.
You don't care if your secretary of state handles sensitive information on an unsecured server?
Baaa baaaa baaaaa!
0
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
In this case, the key is that the FBI found zero evidence that Clinton broke the law or jeopardized national security according to Washington Post and PoliticusUSA. Eventually, Clinton is likely to be cleared of criminal wrongdoing. Besides, public doesn't seem to care much about this phony scandal.
The sheep will not care one bit as you say.
Those that are informed should care with every fiber....
Which are you?
Do you really believe that HRC didn't purposely set up the account so that she could avoid scrutiny?
Of course she did. She was ultra naive for thinking she could get away with it and ultra naive for thinking that Secret Service could protect the servers by standing guard at the front and back gate.
You don't care if your secretary of state handles sensitive information on an unsecured server?
"Here's what I know," Obama told Chris Wallace. "Hillary Clinton was an
outstanding Secretary of State. She would never intentionally put
America in any kind of jeopardy."
Ignorantia juris non excusat..............a person who is unaware of a law may not escape liability for violating that law merely because he or she was unaware of its content.
Ignorance of the law/rules is no defense..
It does not matter if Hillary intended to break the law or not, the only question is, did she break the law?
...Yes !!!!
0
"Here's what I know," Obama told Chris Wallace. "Hillary Clinton was an
outstanding Secretary of State. She would never intentionally put
America in any kind of jeopardy."
Ignorantia juris non excusat..............a person who is unaware of a law may not escape liability for violating that law merely because he or she was unaware of its content.
Ignorance of the law/rules is no defense..
It does not matter if Hillary intended to break the law or not, the only question is, did she break the law?
...Yes !!!!
In this case, the key is that the FBI found zero evidence that Clinton broke the law or jeopardized national security according to Washington Post and PoliticusUSA. Eventually, Clinton is likely to be cleared of criminal wrongdoing. Besides, public doesn't seem to care much about this phony scandal.
Bud if this were you and did what Hillary did you would be in jail !!
0
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
In this case, the key is that the FBI found zero evidence that Clinton broke the law or jeopardized national security according to Washington Post and PoliticusUSA. Eventually, Clinton is likely to be cleared of criminal wrongdoing. Besides, public doesn't seem to care much about this phony scandal.
Bud if this were you and did what Hillary did you would be in jail !!
Claims that Clinton violated the law have been consistently debunked by legal experts such as Richard Lampert, Stephen Vladeck and Laurie Levenson. Probably attorney general will decide charges aren't warranted in the future.
0
Claims that Clinton violated the law have been consistently debunked by legal experts such as Richard Lampert, Stephen Vladeck and Laurie Levenson. Probably attorney general will decide charges aren't warranted in the future.
Claims that Clinton violated the law have been consistently debunked by legal experts such as Richard Lampert, Stephen Vladeck and Laurie Levenson. Probably attorney general will decide charges aren't warranted in the future.
Open your own eyes, surely they aren't painted on.
How is it possible that Hillary never received ANY ( not even one )
classified or top secret document on that server?
You don't need a legal expert to influence you one way or the other if you have half a brain.
Omg!
0
Quote Originally Posted by thirdperson:
Claims that Clinton violated the law have been consistently debunked by legal experts such as Richard Lampert, Stephen Vladeck and Laurie Levenson. Probably attorney general will decide charges aren't warranted in the future.
Open your own eyes, surely they aren't painted on.
How is it possible that Hillary never received ANY ( not even one )
classified or top secret document on that server?
You don't need a legal expert to influence you one way or the other if you have half a brain.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
Trump won't give Hillary a pass on the emails like Sanders did.
This could be very interesting!!!