Don't all you Repubs go gloating. Only in America can a legislative majority boost it's campaign by eliminating the eligibility of Native Americans to vote. The South did it to blacks with poll taxes, North Dakota has done it with slight of hand "address confirmation" requirements. Residency of Native Americans in North Dakota? How about 14,000 years. Do they (and you idiots) really think they can sneak in unqualified voters disguised as Sioux Indians? Gimme a break. Morality (and respect for the Constitution) is dead in the Republican Party, winning is the only thing that counts. They will follow Trump over any cliff he chosoes. They used to have some class, but if they do now it is all LOW class.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Don't all you Repubs go gloating. Only in America can a legislative majority boost it's campaign by eliminating the eligibility of Native Americans to vote. The South did it to blacks with poll taxes, North Dakota has done it with slight of hand "address confirmation" requirements. Residency of Native Americans in North Dakota? How about 14,000 years. Do they (and you idiots) really think they can sneak in unqualified voters disguised as Sioux Indians? Gimme a break. Morality (and respect for the Constitution) is dead in the Republican Party, winning is the only thing that counts. They will follow Trump over any cliff he chosoes. They used to have some class, but if they do now it is all LOW class.
Since you seemed so interested in the Mueller investigation I'll pose a question to you: "How many people were indicted or resigned because of scandal in the Obama administration as opposed to the 2years of the trump administration? "
0
Quote Originally Posted by Killer_B:
Only need 1 reason - Barack Hussein Obama
Since you seemed so interested in the Mueller investigation I'll pose a question to you: "How many people were indicted or resigned because of scandal in the Obama administration as opposed to the 2years of the trump administration? "
Well let's see, I believe it's 1. General Michael Flynn who hasn't been sentenced yet for lying over some bs contact with the Russians - AFTER THE ELECTION. NO other administration official has been even charged with anything. Manafort, Gates & Papadopoulos were never part of the administration. The Mueller investigation is a big dud and YOU know it.
Certainly the Obama Administration covered for each other very well. Authorized 2,000 assault rifles to be sent to a foreign country and no one was held responsible. The IRS scandal, again no one held responsible. Democrats rarely resign, they just plead the 5th...
0
Well let's see, I believe it's 1. General Michael Flynn who hasn't been sentenced yet for lying over some bs contact with the Russians - AFTER THE ELECTION. NO other administration official has been even charged with anything. Manafort, Gates & Papadopoulos were never part of the administration. The Mueller investigation is a big dud and YOU know it.
Certainly the Obama Administration covered for each other very well. Authorized 2,000 assault rifles to be sent to a foreign country and no one was held responsible. The IRS scandal, again no one held responsible. Democrats rarely resign, they just plead the 5th...
Well let's see, I believe it's 1. General Michael Flynn who hasn't been sentenced yet for lying over some bs contact with the Russians - AFTER THE ELECTION. NO other administration official has been even charged with anything. Manafort, Gates & Papadopoulos were never part of the administration. The Mueller investigation is a big dud and YOU know it.
Certainly the Obama Administration covered for each other very well. Authorized 2,000 assault rifles to be sent to a foreign country and no one was held responsible. The IRS scandal, again no one held responsible. Democrats rarely resign, they just plead the 5th...
If you say so.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Killer_B:
Well let's see, I believe it's 1. General Michael Flynn who hasn't been sentenced yet for lying over some bs contact with the Russians - AFTER THE ELECTION. NO other administration official has been even charged with anything. Manafort, Gates & Papadopoulos were never part of the administration. The Mueller investigation is a big dud and YOU know it.
Certainly the Obama Administration covered for each other very well. Authorized 2,000 assault rifles to be sent to a foreign country and no one was held responsible. The IRS scandal, again no one held responsible. Democrats rarely resign, they just plead the 5th...
Obama himself recently concluded of his eight-year tenure, "I didn't have scandals."
Those were puzzling assertions, given nearly nonstop scandals during Obama's eight years in office involving the IRS; General Services Administration; Peace Corps; Secret Service; Veterans Affairs; and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, not to mention the Clinton email server scandal, the Benghazi scandal and the 2016 Democratic National Committee email scandal.
For nearly eight years, the Obama administration sought to cover up serial wrongdoing by waging a veritable war against the watchdog inspectors general of various federal agencies.
In 2014, 47 of the nation's 73 inspectors general signed a letter alleging that Obama had stonewalled their "ability to conduct our work thoroughly, independently, and in a timely manner."
0
Obama himself recently concluded of his eight-year tenure, "I didn't have scandals."
Those were puzzling assertions, given nearly nonstop scandals during Obama's eight years in office involving the IRS; General Services Administration; Peace Corps; Secret Service; Veterans Affairs; and Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, not to mention the Clinton email server scandal, the Benghazi scandal and the 2016 Democratic National Committee email scandal.
For nearly eight years, the Obama administration sought to cover up serial wrongdoing by waging a veritable war against the watchdog inspectors general of various federal agencies.
In 2014, 47 of the nation's 73 inspectors general signed a letter alleging that Obama had stonewalled their "ability to conduct our work thoroughly, independently, and in a timely manner."
Don't all you Repubs go gloating. Only in America can a legislative majority boost it's campaign by eliminating the eligibility of Native Americans to vote. The South did it to blacks with poll taxes, North Dakota has done it with slight of hand "address confirmation" requirements. Residency of Native Americans in North Dakota? How about 14,000 years. Do they (and you idiots) really think they can sneak in unqualified voters disguised as Sioux Indians? Gimme a break. Morality (and respect for the Constitution) is dead in the Republican Party, winning is the only thing that counts. They will follow Trump over any cliff he chosoes. They used to have some class, but if they do now it is all LOW class.
check out the polling history of the race, there was a huge jump in support for Kramer after she made an epic mistake, namely, outing sexual abuse and domestic violence victims without their permission for use in a campaign ad.
0
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:
Don't all you Repubs go gloating. Only in America can a legislative majority boost it's campaign by eliminating the eligibility of Native Americans to vote. The South did it to blacks with poll taxes, North Dakota has done it with slight of hand "address confirmation" requirements. Residency of Native Americans in North Dakota? How about 14,000 years. Do they (and you idiots) really think they can sneak in unqualified voters disguised as Sioux Indians? Gimme a break. Morality (and respect for the Constitution) is dead in the Republican Party, winning is the only thing that counts. They will follow Trump over any cliff he chosoes. They used to have some class, but if they do now it is all LOW class.
check out the polling history of the race, there was a huge jump in support for Kramer after she made an epic mistake, namely, outing sexual abuse and domestic violence victims without their permission for use in a campaign ad.
Don't all you Repubs go gloating. Only in America can a legislative majority boost it's campaign by eliminating the eligibility of Native Americans to vote. The South did it to blacks with poll taxes, North Dakota has done it with slight of hand "address confirmation" requirements. Residency of Native Americans in North Dakota? How about 14,000 years. Do they (and you idiots) really think they can sneak in unqualified voters disguised as Sioux Indians? Gimme a break. Morality (and respect for the Constitution) is dead in the Republican Party, winning is the only thing that counts. They will follow Trump over any cliff he chosoes. They used to have some class, but if they do now it is all LOW class.
check out the polling history of the race, there was a huge jump in support for Kramer after she made an epic mistake, namely, outing sexual abuse and domestic violence victims without their permission for use in a campaign ad.
OK, quite possible; but how does that relate to voter suppression? If you think you have a viable candidate let them run against ALL the voters.
Now and then even a BLIND squirrel can find an acorn
0
Quote Originally Posted by TILTOLOGIC:
Quote Originally Posted by KeyElement:
Don't all you Repubs go gloating. Only in America can a legislative majority boost it's campaign by eliminating the eligibility of Native Americans to vote. The South did it to blacks with poll taxes, North Dakota has done it with slight of hand "address confirmation" requirements. Residency of Native Americans in North Dakota? How about 14,000 years. Do they (and you idiots) really think they can sneak in unqualified voters disguised as Sioux Indians? Gimme a break. Morality (and respect for the Constitution) is dead in the Republican Party, winning is the only thing that counts. They will follow Trump over any cliff he chosoes. They used to have some class, but if they do now it is all LOW class.
check out the polling history of the race, there was a huge jump in support for Kramer after she made an epic mistake, namely, outing sexual abuse and domestic violence victims without their permission for use in a campaign ad.
OK, quite possible; but how does that relate to voter suppression? If you think you have a viable candidate let them run against ALL the voters.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.