I agree , this might be cincy's superbowl and a shot for one of very few wins for that reason i think they come to play as they usually do in this Ohio rivalry ...Cleveland just does not do enough other than run the ball well i do like Colt Mccoy but just does not have the weapons to help him out , and with Benson out of the clink that only helps the bengals in the run game ...should be a tight one but 6.5 is to much for the browns to be laying to anyone.
0
I agree , this might be cincy's superbowl and a shot for one of very few wins for that reason i think they come to play as they usually do in this Ohio rivalry ...Cleveland just does not do enough other than run the ball well i do like Colt Mccoy but just does not have the weapons to help him out , and with Benson out of the clink that only helps the bengals in the run game ...should be a tight one but 6.5 is to much for the browns to be laying to anyone.
CLE -6 (.5u) - Andy Dalton will be making his first pro start coming from a very week college. I'm siding with Colt and will be remembering why we call them the bungholes. Browns 18- Bengals 9.
0
CLE -6 (.5u) - Andy Dalton will be making his first pro start coming from a very week college. I'm siding with Colt and will be remembering why we call them the bungholes. Browns 18- Bengals 9.
Wow, I'm shocked at the support Cinci is getting in here!!! Let's do a reality check real quick. Here's the top 3 reasons why the Bungles will not cover this week:
1. Andy Dalton?!?! Cam Newton, Andrew Luck, and Jake Locker he definitely is NOT!!!!!! You think he was the reason TCU was a great team last year?!?!? I've got 2 words for you my friend, Matt and Leinart........
2. What happened to the Bengals high profile high output receiving core? It's just a bunch of no name dudes now..........
3. Cedric Benson is the one guy who should've jumped ship too, but didn't - but he can't play every single down. Who backs him up? Does anybody even know?
Not to mention Marvin Lewis - at least with the personalities and Carson Palmer he had a chance, but not now.........
Browns 20 Bengals 3 - - and that's only if they're lucky enough to get close enough to attempt a field goal......
Browns -5.5
0
Wow, I'm shocked at the support Cinci is getting in here!!! Let's do a reality check real quick. Here's the top 3 reasons why the Bungles will not cover this week:
1. Andy Dalton?!?! Cam Newton, Andrew Luck, and Jake Locker he definitely is NOT!!!!!! You think he was the reason TCU was a great team last year?!?!? I've got 2 words for you my friend, Matt and Leinart........
2. What happened to the Bengals high profile high output receiving core? It's just a bunch of no name dudes now..........
3. Cedric Benson is the one guy who should've jumped ship too, but didn't - but he can't play every single down. Who backs him up? Does anybody even know?
Not to mention Marvin Lewis - at least with the personalities and Carson Palmer he had a chance, but not now.........
Browns 20 Bengals 3 - - and that's only if they're lucky enough to get close enough to attempt a field goal......
Wow, I'm shocked at the support Cinci is getting in here!!!Let's do a reality check real quick. Here's the top 3 reasons why the Bungles will not cover this week:
1. Andy Dalton?!?! Cam Newton, Andrew Luck, and Jake Locker he definitely is NOT!!!!!! You think he was the reason TCU was a great team last year?!?!? I've got 2 words for you my friend, Matt and Leinart........
2. What happened to the Bengals high profile high output receiving core? It's just a bunch of no name dudes now..........
3. Cedric Benson is the one guy who should've jumped ship too, but didn't - but he can't play every single down. Who backs him up? Does anybody even know?
Not to mention Marvin Lewis - at least with the personalities and Carson Palmer he had a chance, but not now.........
Browns 20 Bengals 3 - - and that's only if they're lucky enough to get close enough to attempt a field goal......
Browns -5.5
Reality check. Most support is on Cleveland. Reality check. The Browns have some injuries to their offensive line, have probably the second or third worst starting receiving core in the NFL, have a QB who looked terrible in his last few games last year and mediocre in the preseason, have a d line with 3 new starters including 2 rookies, and have a first year coach. Does that warrant laying anything more than 4 points?
1. Andy Dalton played very well last year.
2. The Bengals receivers are better than Cleveland's receivers.
3. Bernard Scott. He's not bad either.
Carson Palmer is washed up.
0
Quote Originally Posted by TheQuadYeah:
Wow, I'm shocked at the support Cinci is getting in here!!!Let's do a reality check real quick. Here's the top 3 reasons why the Bungles will not cover this week:
1. Andy Dalton?!?! Cam Newton, Andrew Luck, and Jake Locker he definitely is NOT!!!!!! You think he was the reason TCU was a great team last year?!?!? I've got 2 words for you my friend, Matt and Leinart........
2. What happened to the Bengals high profile high output receiving core? It's just a bunch of no name dudes now..........
3. Cedric Benson is the one guy who should've jumped ship too, but didn't - but he can't play every single down. Who backs him up? Does anybody even know?
Not to mention Marvin Lewis - at least with the personalities and Carson Palmer he had a chance, but not now.........
Browns 20 Bengals 3 - - and that's only if they're lucky enough to get close enough to attempt a field goal......
Browns -5.5
Reality check. Most support is on Cleveland. Reality check. The Browns have some injuries to their offensive line, have probably the second or third worst starting receiving core in the NFL, have a QB who looked terrible in his last few games last year and mediocre in the preseason, have a d line with 3 new starters including 2 rookies, and have a first year coach. Does that warrant laying anything more than 4 points?
1. Andy Dalton played very well last year.
2. The Bengals receivers are better than Cleveland's receivers.
Reality check. Most support is on Cleveland. Reality check. The Browns have some injuries to their offensive line, have probably the second or third worst starting receiving core in the NFL, have a QB who looked terrible in his last few games last year and mediocre in the preseason, have a d line with 3 new starters including 2 rookies, and have a first year coach. Does that warrant laying anything more than 4 points?
1. Andy Dalton played very well last year. - In COLLEGE, this is the pros kid!!!!!!!!!!
2. The Bengals receivers are better than Cleveland's receivers. - Really?!?! Better than Cribbs & Massaquoi?? I don't think so, and I'll even give you Jordan Shipley out of pity.......... As your former best receiver would say, "Child, please"
3. Bernard Scott. He's not bad either. - Maybe, but he's definitely no Peyton HIllis
Carson Palmer is washed up. - and Dalton is an untested scared rookie unkonwn
0
Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Insight:
Reality check. Most support is on Cleveland. Reality check. The Browns have some injuries to their offensive line, have probably the second or third worst starting receiving core in the NFL, have a QB who looked terrible in his last few games last year and mediocre in the preseason, have a d line with 3 new starters including 2 rookies, and have a first year coach. Does that warrant laying anything more than 4 points?
1. Andy Dalton played very well last year. - In COLLEGE, this is the pros kid!!!!!!!!!!
2. The Bengals receivers are better than Cleveland's receivers. - Really?!?! Better than Cribbs & Massaquoi?? I don't think so, and I'll even give you Jordan Shipley out of pity.......... As your former best receiver would say, "Child, please"
3. Bernard Scott. He's not bad either. - Maybe, but he's definitely no Peyton HIllis
Carson Palmer is washed up. - and Dalton is an untested scared rookie unkonwn
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
most likely under
$$
Hot Forum Topics
