Even if the Lions have been playing reasonably well against good teams I just have a hard time seeing them covering even by 7 points. The Packers have a superb passing attack and indoor it'll be even sharper. Parred with a resurgent rushing offense and a Lions defense which can be run against look for a 60/40 pass/run ratio by the Packers. Last week both Jennings and Driver looked good and with poor depth of the Lions at cornerback those two plus Jones should make the passing attack very potent. Rodgers is on fire and playing extremely well.
The Pack cover by +7 at least and their good defense keeps the Stanton-led Lions under 14 points and probably stay under. 31-14 Packers.
0
Even if the Lions have been playing reasonably well against good teams I just have a hard time seeing them covering even by 7 points. The Packers have a superb passing attack and indoor it'll be even sharper. Parred with a resurgent rushing offense and a Lions defense which can be run against look for a 60/40 pass/run ratio by the Packers. Last week both Jennings and Driver looked good and with poor depth of the Lions at cornerback those two plus Jones should make the passing attack very potent. Rodgers is on fire and playing extremely well.
The Pack cover by +7 at least and their good defense keeps the Stanton-led Lions under 14 points and probably stay under. 31-14 Packers.
The Pack has the tools to get the job done. They know if they do their part and the Patriots handle their rivals - Da Bears- they'll be in a tie for 1st place in the division. It's that time of the season again,boys and girls!
GREEN BAY -6.5 (EXTRALARGE!)
0
The Pack has the tools to get the job done. They know if they do their part and the Patriots handle their rivals - Da Bears- they'll be in a tie for 1st place in the division. It's that time of the season again,boys and girls!
Just to add to the Packers ATS, Vanden Bosch and Smith on IR. Less pass rush, worse secondary and look how Brady torched them on Thanksgiving. Rodgers and company will do the same, Packers look even better
0
Just to add to the Packers ATS, Vanden Bosch and Smith on IR. Less pass rush, worse secondary and look how Brady torched them on Thanksgiving. Rodgers and company will do the same, Packers look even better
Packers own the Lions. 10-0 SU and 7-3 ATS last 10 meetings. Last 4 at Detroit, Pack is 4-0 SU and ATS. Lions now have a starting corner out for this one. They already matched up poorly with the Packers passing game. The real difference and the reason GB will cover 7 will be the mistakes made by Stanton. The 3rd string QB has a history of turnovers when pressured. And this week he will be attacked by the Pack. With Stafford or Shaun Hill in this game I'd say Lions stay close. But the inexperienced QB will help this be a 10+ points Packers win.
Don't look for a GB trap or letdown here. They lost just two games ago and have a great opportunity to catch the Bears this week, with Chicago most likely losing to NE. Also, this is a division game. With the Bears sitting at 4-0 in the NFC North and playing a game this week that won't change that...the Packers cannot afford to lose this division game and fall to 3-2 in the North. So yes, this game is very important to GB.
0
Packers own the Lions. 10-0 SU and 7-3 ATS last 10 meetings. Last 4 at Detroit, Pack is 4-0 SU and ATS. Lions now have a starting corner out for this one. They already matched up poorly with the Packers passing game. The real difference and the reason GB will cover 7 will be the mistakes made by Stanton. The 3rd string QB has a history of turnovers when pressured. And this week he will be attacked by the Pack. With Stafford or Shaun Hill in this game I'd say Lions stay close. But the inexperienced QB will help this be a 10+ points Packers win.
Don't look for a GB trap or letdown here. They lost just two games ago and have a great opportunity to catch the Bears this week, with Chicago most likely losing to NE. Also, this is a division game. With the Bears sitting at 4-0 in the NFC North and playing a game this week that won't change that...the Packers cannot afford to lose this division game and fall to 3-2 in the North. So yes, this game is very important to GB.
It's the time of the year when bad teams -- even the improved and spirited Lions, Bills, &tc. -- start to fold it in.
The biggest factor for me that would take this from a pretty good bet to a really excellent one is the Packer running game... an unknown.
They've been weak without Grant, seemingly not committed to the run the way serious offenses, even the smarter passing offenses, usually are.
Last week, they not only added newguy James Starks, but started throwing to Jackson and the other backs more.
This offers hope not only of making Rogers more effective in Detroit (where he's been solid the last 3 years), but of helping the Packers hold a lead if they get one (unlike their first matchup with the Lions this year in Lambeau.)
Green Bay leads the league in point differential. The only trap is, they seem weakest against "teams they should bet" -- Miami, the Redskins, and even, I'd argue, the Bears earlier. (Packer record for penalties.) Are the Packers the best team ATS this year? Must be close.
But for the reasons others site above, the motivation is there too in this game. Like the Pack minus the 6.5; if it's still that, it's probably a bargain.
Cheers, and in the spirit of Bechmann, "let's analyze."
/ la /
0
It's the time of the year when bad teams -- even the improved and spirited Lions, Bills, &tc. -- start to fold it in.
The biggest factor for me that would take this from a pretty good bet to a really excellent one is the Packer running game... an unknown.
They've been weak without Grant, seemingly not committed to the run the way serious offenses, even the smarter passing offenses, usually are.
Last week, they not only added newguy James Starks, but started throwing to Jackson and the other backs more.
This offers hope not only of making Rogers more effective in Detroit (where he's been solid the last 3 years), but of helping the Packers hold a lead if they get one (unlike their first matchup with the Lions this year in Lambeau.)
Green Bay leads the league in point differential. The only trap is, they seem weakest against "teams they should bet" -- Miami, the Redskins, and even, I'd argue, the Bears earlier. (Packer record for penalties.) Are the Packers the best team ATS this year? Must be close.
But for the reasons others site above, the motivation is there too in this game. Like the Pack minus the 6.5; if it's still that, it's probably a bargain.
Cheers, and in the spirit of Bechmann, "let's analyze."
Lets keep it civilized gentlemen. If the man wants to put Lions on the ML, let it be. I've seen stranger things happen.
GB will separate from the Lions in the first quarter. It will be something like 21-3 by the half. In the second half, GB will more than likely run more than they throw. It is just simple common sense to think that from experience in watching good teams and how they think.
Green Bay 33
Lions 6
0
Lets keep it civilized gentlemen. If the man wants to put Lions on the ML, let it be. I've seen stranger things happen.
GB will separate from the Lions in the first quarter. It will be something like 21-3 by the half. In the second half, GB will more than likely run more than they throw. It is just simple common sense to think that from experience in watching good teams and how they think.
green bay 34 - lions 24. rogers is on fire. lets not forget what brady did to this lions def. in just one half. rogers may not be brady but he has mad game. i am a packer fan so dont listen unless you like the pick. does seem low if its gonna be a beat down. packers are pretty well rounded in all facets
0
green bay 34 - lions 24. rogers is on fire. lets not forget what brady did to this lions def. in just one half. rogers may not be brady but he has mad game. i am a packer fan so dont listen unless you like the pick. does seem low if its gonna be a beat down. packers are pretty well rounded in all facets
Packer homer. The Pack almost lost to Detroit at home. I like the Pakers, but only when teased by 7, to bring the line to a pick. May not play that though. The Over is the play here.
GLTA
0
Packer homer. The Pack almost lost to Detroit at home. I like the Pakers, but only when teased by 7, to bring the line to a pick. May not play that though. The Over is the play here.
Detroit can only backdoor cover so many times this season. Look for a Thanksgiving type game. They dont win and now they pack it in and get ready for next year. Packers and over for the large! Trust me Im a doctor
0
Detroit can only backdoor cover so many times this season. Look for a Thanksgiving type game. They dont win and now they pack it in and get ready for next year. Packers and over for the large! Trust me Im a doctor
So yea I just got up and haven't checked in on this one yet making sure my Falcons are attempting to TCB but I know the Peckers think its cute to go with the no RB thing but they do have some WR's in there today don't they?? I mean I see the the score in the 4th and I see 3-0 against the Lions?? C'mon Peckers I thought u were better than that.
0
So yea I just got up and haven't checked in on this one yet making sure my Falcons are attempting to TCB but I know the Peckers think its cute to go with the no RB thing but they do have some WR's in there today don't they?? I mean I see the the score in the 4th and I see 3-0 against the Lions?? C'mon Peckers I thought u were better than that.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.