Further review #4 Arizona is 17 - 10 ATS as a pre-season fav since 1983. They are 5-2 ATS in their last 7 game 1's. They are 9 - 4 ATS as a fav in their first home game. The Saints on the other hand are 1-6 SU&ATS in their last 7 game one's.
Arizona - 21 New Orleans - 13
Cardinals under 35.5
0
Further review #4 Arizona is 17 - 10 ATS as a pre-season fav since 1983. They are 5-2 ATS in their last 7 game 1's. They are 9 - 4 ATS as a fav in their first home game. The Saints on the other hand are 1-6 SU&ATS in their last 7 game one's.
Okay here we go. The Saints play on an artificial surface. They play at Arizona, a natural grass surface, and they are favored. You already know what to do. Cardinals moneyline. Forget about the points.
0
Okay here we go. The Saints play on an artificial surface. They play at Arizona, a natural grass surface, and they are favored. You already know what to do. Cardinals moneyline. Forget about the points.
Okay here we go. The Saints play on an artificial surface. They play at Arizona, a natural grass surface, and they are favored. You already know what to do. Cardinals moneyline. Forget about the points.
With you Watch, still not sold on the NO secondary even though made some offseason upgrades, and although preseason, AZ usually plays to win and Cards should move ball in air.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Watch:
Okay here we go. The Saints play on an artificial surface. They play at Arizona, a natural grass surface, and they are favored. You already know what to do. Cardinals moneyline. Forget about the points.
With you Watch, still not sold on the NO secondary even though made some offseason upgrades, and although preseason, AZ usually plays to win and Cards should move ball in air.
Hey Colonel Jim, how many times are you going to revise your picks on all these threads? Does that mean you're making your picks on a whim and then once you find some good info, you revise them?
Everyone knows Payton couldn't give a rat's ass about preseason and anyone found guilty of betting on the Saints preseason should be thrown in jail with all those betting on the Colts preseason as well.
Sure, the Saints do win preseason games, but coach always states he doesn't care about winning them.
I wouldn't put my money behind that.
Take the Cards here.
0
Hey Colonel Jim, how many times are you going to revise your picks on all these threads? Does that mean you're making your picks on a whim and then once you find some good info, you revise them?
Everyone knows Payton couldn't give a rat's ass about preseason and anyone found guilty of betting on the Saints preseason should be thrown in jail with all those betting on the Colts preseason as well.
Sure, the Saints do win preseason games, but coach always states he doesn't care about winning them.
Correct HOH they were on a whim looking at the dates they were posted. Then after the Sports annuals started coming out, yes I had to revise them. Guess what, I first posted Washington and changed it up and took the Colts. Looks like I should have kept my whim pick I have a feeling my whim plays will be better than my revised picks in week 1.
0
Correct HOH they were on a whim looking at the dates they were posted. Then after the Sports annuals started coming out, yes I had to revise them. Guess what, I first posted Washington and changed it up and took the Colts. Looks like I should have kept my whim pick I have a feeling my whim plays will be better than my revised picks in week 1.
Spender, all of the money will be on the Cowboys, and they aren't better at any position on the field than Cleveland. Pac Man may not even be on the roster.
Special teams (the nod goes to Cribbs over Dallas returner by committee), quarterback is a wash, because Derek Anderson is just as good as Romo without the big time girlfriend. The Cowboys have Owens and a player to be named later, but the Browns have Jurevicious, Donte Stallworth, Braylon Edwards, the Browns have Winslow at tight end against Witten another wash. Barber and Jamal Lewis. It goes on and on.
Dallas may have the better defense and all the money riding on them, but the only way to make money in NFL betting is to take home dogs that play on different surfaces than the team coming in that is favored.
I'm gonna buy my line to +3.5 and go to the counter.
If Steve Smith is out for the 1st game for Carolina, So it's off my board.
I like the Bucaneers as a +3.5 dog to New Orleans. New Orleans doesn't have the personnel to match up with the physical play of the Bucaneers, and Petitgout and coompany running counter gap for Warrick Dunn. And with Cato June and Talib Aquib. And Garcia at quarterback?
And I always take the Bills at home with a small number, especially against Seattle who will get all of the public money because it looks easy. Seattle db's and secondary as a whole get burnt to a crisp time and again and they didn't do a thing about it in the off season. They are suckers for play action. Buffalo has Marcus Stroud and Terrence McGee. They will make Hasselbeck's time in the pocket uncomfortable. And with no tight end of note on their roster, one of those quick slants will result in a Bills defensive touchdown. It's too easy to take Seattle in this game.
Also Jacksonville shouldn't be giving Tennesse any points at home. Whenever Jacksonville is favored going to play at Tennessee, the Titans cover. It's just that simple.
So my week one plays are reveised due to Steve Smith suspension.
Bucaneers +3.5
Browns +3.5 (which is how i will play it)
Bills-1
Titans+3.5
0
Spender, all of the money will be on the Cowboys, and they aren't better at any position on the field than Cleveland. Pac Man may not even be on the roster.
Special teams (the nod goes to Cribbs over Dallas returner by committee), quarterback is a wash, because Derek Anderson is just as good as Romo without the big time girlfriend. The Cowboys have Owens and a player to be named later, but the Browns have Jurevicious, Donte Stallworth, Braylon Edwards, the Browns have Winslow at tight end against Witten another wash. Barber and Jamal Lewis. It goes on and on.
Dallas may have the better defense and all the money riding on them, but the only way to make money in NFL betting is to take home dogs that play on different surfaces than the team coming in that is favored.
I'm gonna buy my line to +3.5 and go to the counter.
If Steve Smith is out for the 1st game for Carolina, So it's off my board.
I like the Bucaneers as a +3.5 dog to New Orleans. New Orleans doesn't have the personnel to match up with the physical play of the Bucaneers, and Petitgout and coompany running counter gap for Warrick Dunn. And with Cato June and Talib Aquib. And Garcia at quarterback?
And I always take the Bills at home with a small number, especially against Seattle who will get all of the public money because it looks easy. Seattle db's and secondary as a whole get burnt to a crisp time and again and they didn't do a thing about it in the off season. They are suckers for play action. Buffalo has Marcus Stroud and Terrence McGee. They will make Hasselbeck's time in the pocket uncomfortable. And with no tight end of note on their roster, one of those quick slants will result in a Bills defensive touchdown. It's too easy to take Seattle in this game.
Also Jacksonville shouldn't be giving Tennesse any points at home. Whenever Jacksonville is favored going to play at Tennessee, the Titans cover. It's just that simple.
So my week one plays are reveised due to Steve Smith suspension.
Spender, all of the money will be on the Cowboys, and they aren't better at any position on the field than Cleveland. Pac Man may not even be on the roster.
Special teams (the nod goes to Cribbs over Dallas returner by committee), quarterback is a wash, because Derek Anderson is just as good as Romo without the big time girlfriend. The Cowboys have Owens and a player to be named later, but the Browns have Jurevicious, Donte Stallworth, Braylon Edwards, the Browns have Winslow at tight end against Witten another wash. Barber and Jamal Lewis. It goes on and on.
Dallas may have the better defense and all the money riding on them, but the only way to make money in NFL betting is to take home dogs that play on different surfaces than the team coming in that is favored.
I'm gonna buy my line to +3.5 and go to the counter.
If Steve Smith is out for the 1st game for Carolina, So it's off my board.
I like the Bucaneers as a +3.5 dog to New Orleans. New Orleans doesn't have the personnel to match up with the physical play of the Bucaneers, and Petitgout and coompany running counter gap for Warrick Dunn. And with Cato June and Talib Aquib. And Garcia at quarterback?
And I always take the Bills at home with a small number, especially against Seattle who will get all of the public money because it looks easy. Seattle db's and secondary as a whole get burnt to a crisp time and again and they didn't do a thing about it in the off season. They are suckers for play action. Buffalo has Marcus Stroud and Terrence McGee. They will make Hasselbeck's time in the pocket uncomfortable. And with no tight end of note on their roster, one of those quick slants will result in a Bills defensive touchdown. It's too easy to take Seattle in this game.
Also Jacksonville shouldn't be giving Tennesse any points at home. Whenever Jacksonville is favored going to play at Tennessee, the Titans cover. It's just that simple.
So my week one plays are reveised due to Steve Smith suspension.
Bucaneers +3.5
Browns +3.5 (which is how i will play it)
Bills-1
Titans+3.5
The Bills play is a sharp play, but taking the Bucs will get you burned. The Saints will have all the answers in that game if their personnel are healthy and ready to go. No way Payton drops that game.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Watch:
Spender, all of the money will be on the Cowboys, and they aren't better at any position on the field than Cleveland. Pac Man may not even be on the roster.
Special teams (the nod goes to Cribbs over Dallas returner by committee), quarterback is a wash, because Derek Anderson is just as good as Romo without the big time girlfriend. The Cowboys have Owens and a player to be named later, but the Browns have Jurevicious, Donte Stallworth, Braylon Edwards, the Browns have Winslow at tight end against Witten another wash. Barber and Jamal Lewis. It goes on and on.
Dallas may have the better defense and all the money riding on them, but the only way to make money in NFL betting is to take home dogs that play on different surfaces than the team coming in that is favored.
I'm gonna buy my line to +3.5 and go to the counter.
If Steve Smith is out for the 1st game for Carolina, So it's off my board.
I like the Bucaneers as a +3.5 dog to New Orleans. New Orleans doesn't have the personnel to match up with the physical play of the Bucaneers, and Petitgout and coompany running counter gap for Warrick Dunn. And with Cato June and Talib Aquib. And Garcia at quarterback?
And I always take the Bills at home with a small number, especially against Seattle who will get all of the public money because it looks easy. Seattle db's and secondary as a whole get burnt to a crisp time and again and they didn't do a thing about it in the off season. They are suckers for play action. Buffalo has Marcus Stroud and Terrence McGee. They will make Hasselbeck's time in the pocket uncomfortable. And with no tight end of note on their roster, one of those quick slants will result in a Bills defensive touchdown. It's too easy to take Seattle in this game.
Also Jacksonville shouldn't be giving Tennesse any points at home. Whenever Jacksonville is favored going to play at Tennessee, the Titans cover. It's just that simple.
So my week one plays are reveised due to Steve Smith suspension.
Bucaneers +3.5
Browns +3.5 (which is how i will play it)
Bills-1
Titans+3.5
The Bills play is a sharp play, but taking the Bucs will get you burned. The Saints will have all the answers in that game if their personnel are healthy and ready to go. No way Payton drops that game.
New Orleans is 1-4 ats against the Bucaneers over their last 5 games played. And get this 0-5 ats at home playing the Bucs. I'd hesistate to back the Saints with an ats record like that against the Bucs. All that they are going to get is more of the same. Do your homework, mate. I know I am. And I am going to take the Bucs week 1 as a 3.5 point underdog as indicated.
0
Head over Heart,
Here's some food for thought.
New Orleans is 1-4 ats against the Bucaneers over their last 5 games played. And get this 0-5 ats at home playing the Bucs. I'd hesistate to back the Saints with an ats record like that against the Bucs. All that they are going to get is more of the same. Do your homework, mate. I know I am. And I am going to take the Bucs week 1 as a 3.5 point underdog as indicated.
New Orleans is 1-4 ats against the Bucaneers over their last 5 games played. And get this 0-5 ats at home playing the Bucs. I'd hesistate to back the Saints with an ats record like that against the Bucs. All that they are going to get is more of the same. Do your homework, mate. I know I am. And I am going to take the Bucs week 1 as a 3.5 point underdog as indicated.
I understand that. There are a couple bogie teams for the Saints and the Bucs are one of them. I backed the Bucs both times last year going against my Saints. Head over heart for sure.
However, that is exactly why Payton will have his troops ready, if they are healthy, and being the very first game of the season, there will be no mental letdown or lack of aggression. Saints will be ready and they will beat the Bucs. Will they covers the 3.5? Yes, unless they win by a FG. I just don't think +3.5 is enough insurance, so I wouldn't bank on the FG SU loss but cover....
Good luck on your bet, but as a long-time Saints supporter, I know when they will be on and when they will be off. It's more than just the historical numbers for me when wagering on or against the Saints.
0
Quote Originally Posted by Watch:
Head over Heart,
Here's some food for thought.
New Orleans is 1-4 ats against the Bucaneers over their last 5 games played. And get this 0-5 ats at home playing the Bucs. I'd hesistate to back the Saints with an ats record like that against the Bucs. All that they are going to get is more of the same. Do your homework, mate. I know I am. And I am going to take the Bucs week 1 as a 3.5 point underdog as indicated.
I understand that. There are a couple bogie teams for the Saints and the Bucs are one of them. I backed the Bucs both times last year going against my Saints. Head over heart for sure.
However, that is exactly why Payton will have his troops ready, if they are healthy, and being the very first game of the season, there will be no mental letdown or lack of aggression. Saints will be ready and they will beat the Bucs. Will they covers the 3.5? Yes, unless they win by a FG. I just don't think +3.5 is enough insurance, so I wouldn't bank on the FG SU loss but cover....
Good luck on your bet, but as a long-time Saints supporter, I know when they will be on and when they will be off. It's more than just the historical numbers for me when wagering on or against the Saints.
Head over Heart, right on. And good luck to you over the season. As for this game, I am laying off a second half wager, as I feel that the Cardinals are right where they need to be, and there is no sense in taking them higher than that. I see a field goal win and that's about it. I don't anticipate that Warner will be getting in the game, so I'm cool.
0
Head over Heart, right on. And good luck to you over the season. As for this game, I am laying off a second half wager, as I feel that the Cardinals are right where they need to be, and there is no sense in taking them higher than that. I see a field goal win and that's about it. I don't anticipate that Warner will be getting in the game, so I'm cool.
Well obviously i have been fooled. i was under the impression that the Cardinals would be pitting Warner and Lienert against each other in this game all week, but Warner has been on the sideline with a clipboard, and has not come into the game. Oh well. what the hey!
0
Well obviously i have been fooled. i was under the impression that the Cardinals would be pitting Warner and Lienert against each other in this game all week, but Warner has been on the sideline with a clipboard, and has not come into the game. Oh well. what the hey!
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.
under 35.5
under 35.5
I have a feeling my whim plays will be better than my revised picks in week 1.
Saints by 4
Hot Forum Topics
