Round 2 Picks are based off of Round 1s matchup scores.
Van Pelt (+4) vs Byrd (-3) Hadley (+5) vs Blixt (-4) Thompson (-5) vs Crane (+2) Kisner (-2) vs Stricker (-6) *won 3 consecutive years 2009, 2010, 2011.
S Stricker (2nd Round) ML (-102) M Thompson (2nd Round) ML (-156) J Blixt (2nd Round) ML (-140) J Byrd (2nd Round) ML (-130)
BOL!!
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Round 2 Picks are based off of Round 1s matchup scores.
Van Pelt (+4) vs Byrd (-3) Hadley (+5) vs Blixt (-4) Thompson (-5) vs Crane (+2) Kisner (-2) vs Stricker (-6) *won 3 consecutive years 2009, 2010, 2011.
S Stricker (2nd Round) ML (-102) M Thompson (2nd Round) ML (-156) J Blixt (2nd Round) ML (-140) J Byrd (2nd Round) ML (-130)
Well sh*t...Olesen was definitely a dumb pick...i dont even know who the kid is. I just figured if he had a great 1st day and leading the tournament, he would post -2ish? BUT nope...after 8 holes hes already +3, this pick doesnt look promising.
Hope my John Deere Classic picks will turn out to be better. Hoping for a 4 of 4 and finish golf today 4 of 5!
0
Well sh*t...Olesen was definitely a dumb pick...i dont even know who the kid is. I just figured if he had a great 1st day and leading the tournament, he would post -2ish? BUT nope...after 8 holes hes already +3, this pick doesnt look promising.
Hope my John Deere Classic picks will turn out to be better. Hoping for a 4 of 4 and finish golf today 4 of 5!
I will give you a little tip I have always followed, it's up to you if you want to take it. But looking at your picks, you seem to think the guys who won will continue to do so the next round. I always look for guys who may have not played well and expect them to make adjustments and at least play better the next round. I wouldn't expect someone who lost big, to continue to do so. A lot depends on the player and other stats also. GL
0
I will give you a little tip I have always followed, it's up to you if you want to take it. But looking at your picks, you seem to think the guys who won will continue to do so the next round. I always look for guys who may have not played well and expect them to make adjustments and at least play better the next round. I wouldn't expect someone who lost big, to continue to do so. A lot depends on the player and other stats also. GL
Hadley at +120 looks great. Blixt overachieved, Hadley will make adjustments he's much better than the +5. Of course all this is imo. I also like Kisner, but as I mentioned in your thread yesterday, Strick has a great history here. I took both futures. Already bet Hadley, debating Kisner. GL
0
Hadley at +120 looks great. Blixt overachieved, Hadley will make adjustments he's much better than the +5. Of course all this is imo. I also like Kisner, but as I mentioned in your thread yesterday, Strick has a great history here. I took both futures. Already bet Hadley, debating Kisner. GL
had a great morning with other sports, so went ahead with Kisner over Stricker to win 1 unit and Hadley over Blixt a unit to win 1.20 unit. GL on your other plays.
0
had a great morning with other sports, so went ahead with Kisner over Stricker to win 1 unit and Hadley over Blixt a unit to win 1.20 unit. GL on your other plays.
Jarret, thanks for the advice. I did choose the player who played better yesterday, but like i mentioned yesterday, i dont like this field, but won a good amount yesterday and laying it down hoping to get the same performance from the players i chose as they did yesterday. Honestly, if i break even or end up winning 3 of the 5, i am content. Also had a huge bet on Federer!!
BOL!
0
Jarret, thanks for the advice. I did choose the player who played better yesterday, but like i mentioned yesterday, i dont like this field, but won a good amount yesterday and laying it down hoping to get the same performance from the players i chose as they did yesterday. Honestly, if i break even or end up winning 3 of the 5, i am content. Also had a huge bet on Federer!!
I won bets on Fed match win, spread, 1st set and over 10.5 games 1st set and him winning the 3rd set. Also some good soccer and had McNeil over Goosen 2nd round. GL
0
I won bets on Fed match win, spread, 1st set and over 10.5 games 1st set and him winning the 3rd set. Also some good soccer and had McNeil over Goosen 2nd round. GL
sometimes the bet you don't make is the best win. I am usually a guy who figures you can figure out which out of the two will win. I am trying to learn some discipline and money management. If you look at my past posts I was a win/win big but also lose, lose big. I talked to my book and had them limit me to $25 bets. Trying to build small/slow. Good luck
0
sometimes the bet you don't make is the best win. I am usually a guy who figures you can figure out which out of the two will win. I am trying to learn some discipline and money management. If you look at my past posts I was a win/win big but also lose, lose big. I talked to my book and had them limit me to $25 bets. Trying to build small/slow. Good luck
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.