I like the play. Henrik is hitting his stride right now...it just all comes down to if he can putt this week. No surprise if he wins with the way he playing off the tee and with his irons right now.
0
I like the play. Henrik is hitting his stride right now...it just all comes down to if he can putt this week. No surprise if he wins with the way he playing off the tee and with his irons right now.
"The fact that Stenson dominates Schartzel at Augusta is the key to this tournament play".
Last I checked....Schwartzel has a green jacket...Stenson does not!
With all due respect, AJ, Schwartzel won the Masters in 2011, Since then, Stenson has beaten him every year. I would say Stenson has the edge at Augusta despite Schwartzel's green jacket 5 years ago. When we add "current form" into the equation, it makes the argument even more compelling.
------------------------------------
Augusta History
2015 Stenson 19th Schwartzel 38th
2014 Stenson 14th Schwartzel CUT
2013 Stenson 18th Schwartzel 25th
2012 Stenson 40th Schwartzel 50th
----------------------------------------
Current Form:
Stenson - 2016 March 3 - T28 March 10 - T11 March 17 - T3 March 31 - 2nd
Schwartzel - 2016 March 3 - T17 March 10 - 1st March 23 - T33 March 31 - T13
0
Quote Originally Posted by AJLightning:
I kind of have a problem with this statement.....
"The fact that Stenson dominates Schartzel at Augusta is the key to this tournament play".
Last I checked....Schwartzel has a green jacket...Stenson does not!
With all due respect, AJ, Schwartzel won the Masters in 2011, Since then, Stenson has beaten him every year. I would say Stenson has the edge at Augusta despite Schwartzel's green jacket 5 years ago. When we add "current form" into the equation, it makes the argument even more compelling.
------------------------------------
Augusta History
2015 Stenson 19th Schwartzel 38th
2014 Stenson 14th Schwartzel CUT
2013 Stenson 18th Schwartzel 25th
2012 Stenson 40th Schwartzel 50th
----------------------------------------
Current Form:
Stenson - 2016 March 3 - T28 March 10 - T11 March 17 - T3 March 31 - 2nd
Schwartzel - 2016 March 3 - T17 March 10 - 1st March 23 - T33 March 31 - T13
Agree to disagree....current form means little to nothing this week. Case in point: 2009 Cabrera won when missing the cut at the Palmer and The Shell the two weeks prior.
Good vibes and good history is what it takes THIS WEEK!
I'll take Schwartzel (+115) over Stenson
Good luck Boss!
0
Agree to disagree....current form means little to nothing this week. Case in point: 2009 Cabrera won when missing the cut at the Palmer and The Shell the two weeks prior.
Good vibes and good history is what it takes THIS WEEK!
Agree to disagree....current form means little to nothing this week. Case in point: 2009 Cabrera won when missing the cut at the Palmer and The Shell the two weeks prior.
Good vibes and good history is what it takes THIS WEEK!
I'll take Schwartzel (+115) over Stenson
Other than Augusta history and current form, both displayed in post #5, I'm not sure what's left. These are the main 2 factors I use when handicapping golf.
Not sure what "Good Vibes" are. The "Good History" is on the side of Stenson. I do place a lot of emphasis on current form, which also favors Stenson this week.
Good luck with your Charl play, AJ.... but not enough luck to win the wager.
0
Quote Originally Posted by AJLightning:
Agree to disagree....current form means little to nothing this week. Case in point: 2009 Cabrera won when missing the cut at the Palmer and The Shell the two weeks prior.
Good vibes and good history is what it takes THIS WEEK!
I'll take Schwartzel (+115) over Stenson
Other than Augusta history and current form, both displayed in post #5, I'm not sure what's left. These are the main 2 factors I use when handicapping golf.
Not sure what "Good Vibes" are. The "Good History" is on the side of Stenson. I do place a lot of emphasis on current form, which also favors Stenson this week.
Good luck with your Charl play, AJ.... but not enough luck to win the wager.
Henrik hit the ball so incredibly well last week, even better than usual and he is always one of the top ball strikers. If his putter is even remotely as good as it has been lately on these augusta greens he is a near lock for the top 10 this week IMO so decent bet. He seems to have a renewed focus on the greens and on his game in totality as well which is something that has always held him back.
0
Henrik hit the ball so incredibly well last week, even better than usual and he is always one of the top ball strikers. If his putter is even remotely as good as it has been lately on these augusta greens he is a near lock for the top 10 this week IMO so decent bet. He seems to have a renewed focus on the greens and on his game in totality as well which is something that has always held him back.
My last comment here is how can history favor Stenson when he hasn't won at Augusta?
Winning it all means more to me that a bunch of high finishes. You can have a million top 10 finishes, but it takes a special player to win at Augusta
Were are not talking about winning it all, AJ. This is simply about one golfer finishing higher than another, a matchup bet.
Stenson is 4-0 in the last 4 Masters vs Schwartzel, He also comes into the Masters with a 3rd place, 2nd place finishes in the past 2 weeks. I put a lot more stock into these numbers, over Schwartzel winning the jacket half a decade ago.
0
Quote Originally Posted by AJLightning:
My last comment here is how can history favor Stenson when he hasn't won at Augusta?
Winning it all means more to me that a bunch of high finishes. You can have a million top 10 finishes, but it takes a special player to win at Augusta
Were are not talking about winning it all, AJ. This is simply about one golfer finishing higher than another, a matchup bet.
Stenson is 4-0 in the last 4 Masters vs Schwartzel, He also comes into the Masters with a 3rd place, 2nd place finishes in the past 2 weeks. I put a lot more stock into these numbers, over Schwartzel winning the jacket half a decade ago.
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.