Looking for some help from my fellow degenerates. I was hoping the issue would already be settled but I can't find solid evidence to back up my claim.
Valero Texas Open round 4: Hoffman vs Woo Kim H2H. My betting site had the start time listed as 3:30EST, so at 3:15EST I placed a max bet $2k on Woo Kim. Then as I turned to watch the match immediately after the bet was placed, I found out the match had already begun and they were through the 3rd hole. (There was a rain delay and times weren't accurate starting back)
According to my sites rules: 26. Dates and kick-off times of events shown are for guidance purposes only. Bets will be accepted up to the advertised kick-off time. For any reason a bet is inadvertently accepted after an event or match has started, the selection(s) affected will be made void. This applies to both sports wagering and horse wagering.
So I tried to just bet opposite and risk juicing out if the bets wasn't void because I was afraid of what ended up happening. However, I didn't have enough available credits to back the bet the opposite way so I had to let it ride.
So of course the bet loses and after about 30mins post match when I was expecting the bet to void itself, it decides to count my bet as a loss..
One of my bookies partners is willing to void my bet but only if I can find proof the match had already started when I placed my bet. So my question is, does anyone have proof of when these players actually teed off? Live blog, twitter update, etc?
0
To remove first post, remove entire topic.
Looking for some help from my fellow degenerates. I was hoping the issue would already be settled but I can't find solid evidence to back up my claim.
Valero Texas Open round 4: Hoffman vs Woo Kim H2H. My betting site had the start time listed as 3:30EST, so at 3:15EST I placed a max bet $2k on Woo Kim. Then as I turned to watch the match immediately after the bet was placed, I found out the match had already begun and they were through the 3rd hole. (There was a rain delay and times weren't accurate starting back)
According to my sites rules: 26. Dates and kick-off times of events shown are for guidance purposes only. Bets will be accepted up to the advertised kick-off time. For any reason a bet is inadvertently accepted after an event or match has started, the selection(s) affected will be made void. This applies to both sports wagering and horse wagering.
So I tried to just bet opposite and risk juicing out if the bets wasn't void because I was afraid of what ended up happening. However, I didn't have enough available credits to back the bet the opposite way so I had to let it ride.
So of course the bet loses and after about 30mins post match when I was expecting the bet to void itself, it decides to count my bet as a loss..
One of my bookies partners is willing to void my bet but only if I can find proof the match had already started when I placed my bet. So my question is, does anyone have proof of when these players actually teed off? Live blog, twitter update, etc?
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on
this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide
any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in
your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner
of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.