Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
It is a no play for me, however, if you take out Auburn, Ball State has played nobody.
|
QwackMD | 29 |
|
|
They played in game 1 of the season. I remember the game well. Ga. Tech ran off 24 straight points and the route was on. Then Clemson caught fire, ran off 27 straight points, and took the lead. Ga. Tech finally settled down, kicked two FG's and won 30-27. That was in Atlanta. So far, they have two common opponents, those being Wake Forest and Florida State. Both teams won both games, but Clemson was far more impressive. I think that this game may favor Ga.Tech by 3, but that would be the highest amount. A pick line would not suprise me.
|
djcfl1 | 7 |
|
|
Biggest play of the year? Certainly you jest. Was it my imagination or was it South Florida who just dispatched West Virginia in rather quick fashion in their last game? In the meantime, Rutgers has shown that they are not a serious contender in the Big East, by being beat at home by Pitt and Cincinnati. Just who has Rutgers played an defeated? No one with a record above .500 and TWO FCS schools. Now if you want to play on Rutgers, be my guest, but to say that this is the best play you can come up with all year indicates that you have some seroious work ahead of you if you want to be a successful capper.
|
bander16 | 13 |
|
|
Richardson and Safety Jackson both got a lot of playing time. However I must point out the the line has not moved significantly except at the samller offshore books, who can not take much money on any one team.
|
vanzack | 52 |
|
|
If the Greek were around today, he would say "I told you so" when discussing the racial make up of todays football, both college and pro, and the ever increasing porblems facing both sports. He was way ahead of his time, and told it like it was. I think that there is a huge difference between being a racist and not buying into all of this "political correctness" crap that has flooded the nation.
|
DaRaiders | 41 |
|
|
Perhaps a better question is why would anyone tail anyone else on any site? The fact is that you should be making your own wagers based on your own research. If you want to include other opinions on a game, that is fine, but to base a selection solely on the opinion of someone else is just begging for disaster. It is your money. You make the decision. You have no way of knowing how much others wager (if they wager at all), and how often they wager. You also must take into account all the various ways that people can pad their stats. If you are not good enough to make a decision on your own, you should not be wagering. Remember one thing. It is a well known fact that 85% or more of the people who wager on football end up losers for the season. Caviat Emptor.
|
shadygrady | 14 |
|
|
This game opened at -16 in Vegas and has now jumped to -20. A lot of this has to do with all the hype TCS is getting. While TCU should be an obvious winner, I shy away from lines that have been pumped up by players who read the polls and listen to all the hype on T.V. Pass.
|
koko11 | 27 |
|
|
That certainly seems to be the popular play.
|
txrocket69 | 19 |
|
|
I am also suprised at the line movement. What really is shocking is that Cal starts out at +115 on the ML, and now Arizona is +115 on the ML. I do not know why the Vegas books left themselves open for a middle like this, unless there simply is not that much action on the game.
|
shoogashane33 | 14 |
|
|
This post is worthless. No one givew a caca about how big TCU won. The fact is that they won, and will go to some BCS game (but NOT the BCS Championship Game) if they go undefeated. Hopefully Utah defeats them this Saturday so we can put an end to this nonsense.
|
Rickerbockers | 27 |
|
|
Just what is your total for this year, seeing as you wager on just about every game on the board? I was just wondering because it is impossible to keep up with you, and I notice that you do not give us any running totals. I'm hitting at over 67% since 10/9 and can prove it. 19-9-2 to be exact. I am 45-26-2 overall, for a 63% clip both college and pro. I know, not many games, but why bet a little on a bunch of games when you can do so well wagering a lot on a few selected games. You are a good capper with some knowledge, but you wager on way too many games for my likings.
|
DoubleUp4Life | 190 |
|
|
replied to
11/07 NCAAF: Texas A&M vs Colorado, Houston vs Tulsa - One is a sucker bet and one is not.
in College Football
This is the difference between winners and losers. Winners took Houston when the line was +1. Losers took them when the line was -1 (push) or -1.5 (loss). To win money in this game you have to be able to wager on games at any time, between Sunday afternoon, when the line first comes out, and seconds before game time.
|
HappyKane | 37 |
|
|
Anyone who wagered on Notre Dame should have his/her genes removed from the general pool. Irish fans are the biggest suckers on the planet. That huge write up was the biggest bunch of caca I have read in a long time. All it did was miss the entire point. Notre Dame stinks. I hope that those of you who wasted your money on that worthless team have finally learned your lesson. You can try to rationalize it any way you want, but the fact is that Notre Dame is the most over-rated team in American College Football History.
|
Whodeysb09 | 366 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Professortrades:
Actually I will school a few of you here on ivesting. Its what I do for a living. The ONLY question you should EVER ask yourself when investing is this.................. "What am I willing to risk to win what I am wanting to win?" When you pick an investment that you think is solid then that question is the ONLY matter remaining. Live and learn! B.S. Is that clear enough for you? I win 10 times as much as you do and do not have to have a perfect record or lay huge odds like you do. You do not get comped in any casino on Vegas playing those mickey mouse wagers. Give it a rest boy. Disappear. |
Professortrades | 358 |
|
|
replied to
guys just wanted to let you know that the wolf is not a rookie no more i just became a veteran..
in College Football
Veterans do not buy hooks. Amateurs do. And you bought a huge hook. What did you have to lay?
|
wolfhunter | 40 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by baskets4money:
correction 53 Nice try, but that does not cut it. Do not try to sell us on a better number after you stated what you wagered on. Stirctly an amateur move. And don't tell us you made a mistake. |
baskets4money | 24 |
|
|
replied to
BOBBY LOCK's FRIDAY NIGHT SPECIAL SERIOUS LOCKS FOR SERIOUS HANDICAPPERS
in College Football
I tend to agree with you on the side, but the total is a bit iffy, especially with all the injuries that Tech has.
|
Bobby_Lock | 7 |
|
|
I see a low scoring game. Alabama's offense has desintigrated into a one man show, and that man is RB Ingram. LSU's offense is certainly questionable at best. I see a low scoring game, very similar to the Florida-LSU game.
|
stakkibotris | 14 |
|
|
replied to
No. 5 Boise State (8-0) at Louisiana Tech (3-5) ..TOTAL ON THIS.. WILL NOT LOSE IM ON THE RIGHT SIDE
in College Football
With so many Tech players questionable or doubtful for the game, I would pass.
|
HEADHUNTER8383 | 20 |
|
|
One would think that Boise State has to win every game 50-0 to gain any ground on TCU. They have no one left to play that is any good at all, so the only way for Boise to close ground is to win impressively and play on the consciences of the voters.
|
pucku27 | 52 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.