Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
When they lined up in victory formation on first down I could not believe it. I still have no idea what they were thinking.
|
vanzack | 45 |
|
|
They did make them snap the extra point. Ucf took a knee...
|
the1andonly12 | 10 |
|
|
Even my sponsor is telling me to jump off the wagon and onto Nebraska this week...good luck
|
TRAIN69 | 57 |
|
|
Anyone that takes head to head matchups as the sole factor in ranking teams is mentally lazy. I think debate is healthy and despite all the frustration good for the sport. We wouldn't be here in this thread if we all did not on some level enjoy the debate. I happen to be one that has tcu ahead of Baylor right now and that is coming from an Oklahoma fan. That doesn't mean I can't understand and appreciate the other side of the debate. Having said that , I can make a better case for Baylor than the person that simply says they won head to head and all else is moot. It is a 12 game season that cannot be simplified into one game. It isnt fair to either team. And further, knowing the season is not over yet, it would be foolish for me to sit here and say there is no way as the season progresses that I won't change my mind on Baylor or tcu.
Everyone is entitled to their opinion and all opinions should be respected. I have no issues with the committee so long as they stay consistent. Nothing they have done so far cannot be explained by an intelligent person. That does not mean other intelligent people will always agree. When you boil it all down this is a gambling website. The best part about gambling is that when you disagree with something or someone regarding the strength of a team you have the ability to try and make money off that belief. With regard to arguing over fsu and Oregon, if they both win out there is a good chance you will all get to try and make money backing the team you are so strongly arguing for in this thread. Until then let's not all act like our own opinions and those that are like minded are the only valid opinions on this board. But at the same time, let's not be lazy and resort to name calling as opposed to further supporting that opinion in an intelligent manner. Keep up the healthy conversation and remember why we are all here. Many will disagree with my thoughts above and I am happy to discuss my opinions further with anyone who wants more healthy debate especially as it relates to certain teams and how I can support the committee on their current rankings. |
Boom_Boom | 176 |
|
|
Neb will be able to run the ball on Msu. They did it last year and matchup more favorably this year than last. On the flip side, Msu should be able to exploit a very weak lb'ing core for neb. If it were not for the weather concerns I would tell you to take the over and call it a day but because of weather issues it is likely a no play.
If I was forced to take a side I would lean neb but Tim beck is a huge concern. He has a tendency to panic and get away from neb's strengths on offense. That leads to Armstrong trying to do too much which leads to silly turnovers. Without the weather issues I would predict a 34-31 type game giving a slight edge to the home team. I should note I am a non husker fan living in Nebraska so I watch every game and feel like I have a pretty good handle on this neb team. I should also tell you that I generally wait and bet every husker game at half time depending on which team shows up. Good luck |
Super_Chicken | 28 |
|
|
Been at 2 most of the day...any chance it drops to 3. Starting to run out of time for guys around the cut line to drop some strokes
|
billieman | 1 |
|
|
I think payouts will be decent even with favorites coming in...we know the pot is over 6 million coming in and will likely be over 10 when all is said and done. Even if you have 10000 winning tickets the payout will be over 1000
|
Roused | 24 |
|
|
I think it will come down to the winner of the blues/hawks. I just can't see a team from the east winning a best of 7 this year...gl
|
Odds1_stinker | 47 |
|
|
Hawks -1/2
|
billieman | 3 |
|
|
Have not been able to get into hoops this year and have been following hockey more closely...figured I would post for a while to hold myself accountable. I generally bet hockey in open parlays of 3-5 teams. Like the rest win some lose some. For record keeping purposes will just assume all plays are 100 on dogs snd to win 100 on favs. For tonight...
Minny -1/2 +191 Minny/Pitt 1p under 1.5 -140 Pitt under 2.5 even Boston/buff 1p under 1.5 -160 Stl -1/2 +107 Nash/tamp 1p under 1.5 -120 Boston -1/2 -111 Gl all |
billieman | 1 |
|
|
In my experience people that complain about slow grading of winning wagers don't have enough money to be gambling anyway and likely lose a lot and bet more than they should.
Further 5d has mirror sites that have always worked for me regardless of when you are trying to get in and I play a lot of in game lines. As far as payouts, I have never had an issue in the past and in fact have received my money faster than other sites I have used in the past. My only frustration has been them limiting in game wager amounts for some games for me but aside from that if you are looking offshore I have not played with a better book in today's gambling environment. On a side note, if you know the rules about bad lines you are smart enough not to bet them regardless of what customer service tells you. Most of us have seen bad lines on the site and it's easy to just stay away from those games. I think both tony and the player have a valid argument with regard to the 40k however if you avoid the bad lines to begin with you never have to worry about that. |
ATLGettinPaper | 96 |
|
|
It's hard to explain if u did not watch. It was incredible that Dallas won that game. Chicago had at least 3 times the scoring chances. Like I said it has nothing to do with tonight but I would not use that game as an example of Dallas playing good hockey right now.
|
crazycdneh | 51 |
|
|
The two prior Chicago games were pretty even. They were outshot 50-18 in their last win. I am not sure I have seen that before in a win. I'm not saying Dallas is not a good pick...I just don't want people thinking they outplayed Chicago last time out. That was one of the oddest games I have seen. Although having the over I did not mind it haha
|
crazycdneh | 51 |
|
|
It should be noted that despite Dallas beating Chicago last time out they were utterly dominated in that game...but hey that is hockey for you. Good Luck
|
crazycdneh | 51 |
|
|
I couldn't agree more on osu/msu. I saved the last team of a decent parlay for that game. Msu defense is so overrated its laughable. Osu will score 30 plus because the do every game and the Msu offense will not be able to keep up. Gl
|
WahooS | 121 |
|
|
replied to
Where can I find historical odds and results? And a larger than normal play...
in College Football
Awesome...thank you bookie
|
billieman | 10 |
|
|
created a topic
Where can I find historical odds and results? And a larger than normal play...
in College Football
Trying to find historical odds and results to help a buddy out. Any help is appreciated.
Large play for me on OSU -5.5. I live in big 10 country and watch most games. A lot of people want to criticize the osu defense and they have a right to but what most are overlooking is how overrated this Msu team is in my opinion. The defense is good but has yet to be tested by an offense like osu. In fact Nebraska did whatever they wanted on offense with 4 starting olineman out but had some bad turnovers that were not even forced by the defense. A strong run game like osu will give this defense fits and open up the rest if the field. Spare me the talk about the press man corners. I have osu -5.5 to finish out a 5 teamer and have been waiting a couple weeks for this matchup. Gl |
billieman | 10 |
|
|
I have always requested a check and have never had a problem...only thing I don't line is the 3k limit.
|
bkcfunk | 8 |
|
|
If you really think rankings and record should be the primary factor in determining point spreads you are in the wrong business...should be a good game
|
slick15 | 77 |
|
|
Nice hit! Good luck with the rest of the card
|
atlasshrugged | 74 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.