blairaj

Rookie

Posts: 969

Member Since: December 2007

Status: Offline

About me:

Signature:

Filter Posts by:

WAGERING : 888-988-4678

Profile

Entries

Thread Author

Posts

Activity

replied to I just realized ......
in Pro Golf

Yup, then the dumbass came out and bogeyed 3 of the first 4 holes on Sunday - never even had a shot. He was right there thru 3 rounds though.

View Post | View Thread

blairaj

3

November 20, 2012

View Post | View Thread

created a topic I just realized ......
in Pro Golf

that I fucked up. The $20 bets that I made on Rollins(44:1) and Villegas(50:1) - I actually punched them in as $200 each.

Come on Camillo!!!!!!!

View Post | View Thread

blairaj

3

November 09, 2012

View Post | View Thread

replied to Can anyone make a case for the Bengals today?
in NFL Betting

I think you could definitely make a case for Bengals in 1H. Bengals coming off the bye, Denver started some road games notoriously slow, ....

But, I would not want to bank on them for the game. They will, as always, get outcoached at half time and Manning will make the right adjustments to walk away with the second half pretty easily.

View Post | View Thread

Dominic20

22

November 04, 2012

View Post | View Thread

replied to WGN HSBC Championship
in Pro Golf

Quote Originally Posted by Nhenley:

Lefty's length gives him a hugh advantage on the 5 par 5's on this course as he was -5 on the par 5's in the 1st round. Westwood has some length too, but he's not as straight. Don't be surprised if Lefty duplicate his 66 in the 2nd round.

GL to all

While your pick to turn out to be a good one, your reasoning certainly is suspect. Westwood is one of, if not THE, best combination of length and accuracy on any tour. Now, if you were to value Mickleson's huge advantage in chipping and putting, that would certainly be some sound reasoning.

View Post | View Thread

Bluefin

15

November 01, 2012

View Post | View Thread

replied to CIMB Classic
in Pro Golf

Both Garrigus and Harman have the better overall H2H and rd2 H2H. Harman too has the current form advantage as Mattesson has missed his last 2 cuts and even threw an 80 in there. Garrigus is easily one of the top ball strikers on tour - for him it's all about putting. Usually if he gets it rolling, he can keep it rolling, at least through the first 3 rounds, he tends to pucker up a bit in the final round.

View Post | View Thread

MrBogey

22

October 25, 2012

View Post | View Thread

replied to CIMB
in Pro Golf

MU	STRAIGHT BET [7208] P PEREZ (2ND ROUND) +110 (K NA ( 2ND ROUND ) vrs P PEREZ (2ND ROUND))	200 / 220
MU	STRAIGHT BET [7211] D CHIA (2ND ROUND) +220 (D CHIA (2ND ROUND) vrs G CHALMERS (2ND ROUND))	200 / 440
MU	STRAIGHT BET [7218] R GARRIGUS ( 2ND ROUND ) +110 (J OVERTON ( 2ND ROUND ) vrs R GARRIGUS ( 2ND ROUND ))	200 / 220
MU	STRAIGHT BET [7220] B HARMAN (2ND ROUND) -125 (T MATTESON (2ND ROUND) vrs B HARMAN (2ND ROUND))	250 / 200

View Post | View Thread

blairaj

12

October 25, 2012

View Post | View Thread

replied to CIMB Classic
in Pro Golf

tailing the chia pick, looks like definitely some value there

View Post | View Thread

MrBogey

22

October 25, 2012

View Post | View Thread

replied to CIMB Classic
in Pro Golf

damn, I was just about to punch in Perez and Harman, now you've got me relooking. I also like garrigus over overton

View Post | View Thread

MrBogey

22

October 25, 2012

View Post | View Thread

replied to CIMB
in Pro Golf

MU	STRAIGHT BET [7102] A LAHIRI (1ST ROUND) +155 (K STANLEY (1ST ROUND) vrs A LAHIRI (1ST ROUND))	200 / 310
MU	STRAIGHT BET [7104] S HEND (1ST ROUND) +210 (J SENDEN (1ST ROUND) vrs S HEND (1ST ROUND))	200 / 420
MU	STRAIGHT BET [7106] S RAHMAN (1ST ROUND) +155 (J HUH (1ST ROUND) vrs S RAHMAN (1ST ROUND))	200 / 310
MU	STRAIGHT BET [7108] P MEESAWAT (1ST ROUND) +175 (S PIERCY (1ST ROUND) vrs P MEESAWAT (1ST ROUND))	200 / 350
MU	STRAIGHT BET [7110] D LIPSKY (1ST ROUND) +210 (C PETTERSSON (1ST ROUND) vrs D LIPSKY (1ST ROUND))	200 / 420
MU	STRAIGHT BET [7112] G BHULLAR (1ST ROUND) +190 (R GARRIGUS (1ST ROUND) vrs G BHULLAR (1ST ROUND))	200 / 380
MU	STRAIGHT BET [7114] T WIRATCHANT (1ST ROUND) +200 (B VAN PELT (1ST ROUND) vrs T WIRATCHANT (1ST ROUND))	200 / 400
MU	STRAIGHT BET [7116] M KOBAYASHI (1ST ROUND) +285 (J DUFNER (1ST ROUND) vrs M KOBAYASHI (1ST ROUND))	200 / 570
MU	STRAIGHT BET [7118] J KRUGER (1ST ROUND) +170 (N WATNEY (1ST ROUND) vrs J KRUGER (1ST ROUND))	200 / 340
MU	STRAIGHT BET [7120] M FRASER (1ST ROUND) +230 (T WOODS (1ST ROUND) vrs M FRASER (1ST ROUND))	200 / 460

View Post | View Thread

blairaj 12 October 24, 2012

View Post | View Thread

replied to CIMB
in Pro Golf

I did it. I'm getting a lot better lines than you are to boot. I've got an agreement with my local to adjust from a 30 cent line down to a dime line. He just set up with a new website, and instead of taking a dime of each the fav and dog, he's got them setting it up to bump the dog by 20c. So, I get a little screwed on the favs, but it sure plays into my hands for doing something like this.

View Post | View Thread

blairaj 12 October 24, 2012

View Post | View Thread

replied to CIMB
in Pro Golf

I just looked, I have 10 matches available. The smallest dog is +155. If 4 of the 10 hit I'd make money. Hell, it only takes 3 of the biggest to hit to break even. You've got me considering it .......

View Post | View Thread

blairaj 12 October 24, 2012

View Post | View Thread

replied to CIMB
in Pro Golf

Yeah I can see that. It's just so hard to know anything about any of them. If I was gonna do anything, I'd just blindly play all the dogs for the same amount.

View Post | View Thread

blairaj 12 October 24, 2012

View Post | View Thread

replied to CIMB
in Pro Golf

My first round matchups suck a dick, most of them around 200. I'll pass on that crap.

View Post | View Thread

blairaj 12 October 24, 2012

View Post | View Thread

created a topic CIMB
in Pro Golf

FT, 1u unless noted

Noh+125 o Watney 2u

Crane+115 o Haas

Walker+115 o Pettersson

Garrigus-125 o Piercy

View Post | View Thread

blairaj 12 October 24, 2012

View Post | View Thread

replied to Key stats CIMB?
in Pro Golf

tour-tips doesn't have them for this one either

View Post | View Thread

MrBogey 7 October 24, 2012

View Post | View Thread

replied to McGladrey - time to get back at this
in Pro Golf

addiing:

Howell+115 o Cauley (1.5u)

View Post | View Thread

blairaj 29 October 21, 2012

View Post | View Thread

replied to McGladrey - time to get back at this
in Pro Golf

Rd3: 1-1, 0.0
Duke-130 o Sabbatini
Trahan+130 o Gay

Rd4: all 1.5u
Stenson-135 o Villegas
Curtis-120 o English
Wilson+130 o Horschel
Crane+125 o Singh

View Post | View Thread

blairaj 29 October 20, 2012

View Post | View Thread

replied to QUICK QUESTION
in Pro Golf

yes, just like the first cut

View Post | View Thread

MrBogey 3 October 20, 2012

View Post | View Thread

replied to McGladrey - time to get back at this
in Pro Golf

Rd3: 1u
Duke-130 o Sabbatini
Trahan+130 o Gay

View Post | View Thread

blairaj 29 October 20, 2012

View Post | View Thread

replied to Distracted players
in Pro Golf

Fowler also played with Tiger that day right? And, Tiger definitely had that old Tiger aura about him that day.

View Post | View Thread

MrBogey 10 October 20, 2012

View Post | View Thread

About Us

Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials

Betting Guides

Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming

Sports Betting

US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps

Contests

Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools

The Covers community has

618,670

lifetime members worldwide

Join our community today

Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.

Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service

Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.

blairaj Follow Follow Unfollow

blairaj