C-NART

C-NART
Veteran
Participation Meter
Posts: 1773
Member Since: July 2007
Last Activity: 03 January 2023
Status: Offline
About me:
Signature:
Profile Entries Thread Author Posts Activity
replied to BK @ ATL
in NBA Betting

coolNice hit brother!

View Post | View Thread
Medieval 5
View Post | View Thread
replied to Bowl Money ~ Wahoo/Train Collab Bets ~ Part 8
in Penalty Box

@lajohn

 He posted clearly. Not only did he mention Minnesota’s coach by name and record, he also referenced Cuse as the team he is betting against.

 

If you aren’t bright enough or can’t take the time to figure it out when betting “real money” as you state, then you should probably quit and/or stop being a f*cking douchebag.

View Post | View Thread
WahooS 148
View Post | View Thread
replied to DEVIN BOOKER SITTING OUT TODAY
in NBA Betting

@MrBator

 

With all due respect, are not the Suns your team (as a fan when gambling isn’t involved). I understand last season you were heavily invested and convinced it was their year to win it all, but did them not achieving that goal turn into “hatred”?

 

Closest I came to that scenario if true was with the 1998 Vikings. Still cannot fathom how old reliable Gary was able to choke that chip shot field goal for a berth the Super Bowl. Especially since he was the first place kicker in NFL history to covert 100% of his regular season FG and XPT attempts. 

I was completely sick to my stomach. That evening I became  part of an even larger community of Vikings fans today, believing their must be a franchise curse preventing us from attaining the coveted Vince Lombardi trophy. Still don’t think it ever come to fruition.

 

Anyway, please explain your relationship with the Suns and how it has evolved to this point in time.

View Post | View Thread
HarDix 14
View Post | View Thread
replied to Worse beat of my life
in MLB Betting

@HabsHater88

 Misery loves company, so if it makes you feel any better I lost the U7.5 in the Twins/Astros game yesterday in similar moose fashion.

 

Glad I took the F5 U3.5 in the AZ/KC game, should done same in Twins/Astros I guess.

 

Let’s get back on the horse ?? today and ride!

View Post | View Thread
HabsHater88 11
View Post | View Thread
created a topic Va Tech Live ML +260
in College Basketball
Go Hokies,great price.
View Post | View Thread
C-NART 3
View Post | View Thread
replied to Anyone have advice? Need feedback
in NBA Betting
I had similar issues and ended up changing books to Betonline.com. They have been excellent with quick payments, low fees and maximum one time withdrawal of $9,000.00.
View Post | View Thread
MushKing 8
View Post | View Thread
replied to NCAA Picks 12/13/17
in College Basketball
Are you sure about Wisconsin and the over? 
View Post | View Thread
Gamebreaker23 2
View Post | View Thread
replied to These are my plays today...
in College Basketball
Mich/Tex total is now at 127.5 at my book, FYI.
View Post | View Thread
Gamebreaker23 9
View Post | View Thread
replied to Tuesday's play...
in NBA Betting
I also lean Kings -4.5, rejuvenated Zach Randolph leading team.
View Post | View Thread
placeholder 16
View Post | View Thread
replied to **** Tuesday College Hoops ****
in College Basketball
My book has Texas -6, leaning strong that way as well. 
View Post | View Thread
ByrdMane612 8
View Post | View Thread
created a topic 2nd half Por/GS
in NBA Betting
Blazers pk -110
View Post | View Thread
C-NART 1
View Post | View Thread
replied to How to Double my 50$ ?
in NFL Betting
Vikings
View Post | View Thread
al3betting 9
View Post | View Thread
replied to Redskins +2
in NFL Betting
The Vikings win and cover the measly spread. This defense is legit and will dominate the line of scrimmage. Cousins best have some extra padding on this afternoon as he will be on his a** quite a bit.
View Post | View Thread
Mancity 18
View Post | View Thread
replied to Bye Bye legal recreational marijuana
in Politics
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:

cd,

If you had or have kids, my argument is not weak at all..parents responsibility has nothing to do with my comments. I mentioned in very specific detail what my concerns were, I think you are so mad at the administration that you missed my points.

I only speak about social benefit vs social cost..not taxpayer cost or political cost or religious beliefs, none of that. In fact if you have any ability to analyze you would know I am never about mixing personal or religious opinions with politics, I support the laws as they exist even if I do not agree with some things personally. If I am so against a law that I need to try and make a change and I feel I can, I and everyone should try to do so INSIDE the laws as they exist.

From only a social perspective, I do not see the benefits worth the social cost. Kids are faced with social challenges which have nothing to do with parents and everything to do with peer pressure and choice. If I had my way (which I dont) I would remove all and any addiction influences on kids and teens, the damage it causes and lives it changes are like no other. When kids face pressures from cigs, alkie, pot, vaping, etc etc it stops the ability for them to learn, explore and develop in ways we will never know. Kids that alter their lives due to these influences could have experienced completely different outcomes and developed into much greater social contributors and stronger people.

Social cost vs social benefit...that is the only point I am forwarding. I dont know what anyone could argue against my point, there is nothing to argue.

https://m.ranker.com/list/13-ways-important-historical-figures-used-marijuana/sarakate




View Post | View Thread
cd329 59
View Post | View Thread
replied to Bye Bye legal recreational marijuana
in Politics
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:

Of course that is the argument used (and will in this thread many times I am sure) but there are lines drawn in any civilized society and I guess I am of the opinion that pot deserves to be inside the boundaries that keeps it away from recreational users.

I think the medicinal value is worth having it controlled and administered, but not to smoke and for sure not recreationally. I think its uses can be extracted and administered without the need to smoke and especially not where there are thousands of variations, that to me is quite telling about those users and their intentions.

I dont like knowing that there is yet another substance out there which our youth can be influenced by and can negatively impact how kids are socially challenged.

So for sure let the extraction value stick, the rest I could do without and I do not see the intrinsic social VALUE in allowing recreational use...notice I did not reference the prison/police angle at all in my analysis..only social value and social cost as to influence.

I don't think the "boundaries that keep it away from recreational users" are working as you wrote previously, since those that to to use will still use as also stated previously in your quotes.

Furthermore, the "lines drawn in any civilized society" do not need to be drawn based a person of your opinion deciding what I am allowed to put in my body in the privacy of my own home.  

You also wrote you would ban alcohol and tobacco, I suppose guns are also on your list? You believe the triggers squeeze themselves?

Glad to see you acknowledge the medicinal benefit, but if you are agreeing it is beneficial to society in a medical capacity, then why would you want to keep those benefits illegal?

"That to me, is quite telling about those users and their intentions", as you also wrote above, sounds very judgmental for someone who has supposedly never even tried the herb.

Unfortunately, according to many of your statements on the topic up to this point, I am quite certain your garbage never stinks. "Legalize it, don't criticize it", as the great Peter Tosh once sang truly. 

Of course there are "thousands of variations" and illegal dealers when it is not taxed and regulated market.

Not sure about your whole "knowing there is yet another substance out there which our youth can be influenced by" statement comes from. Cannibus Has been around for a very long time if you know the history, and thiugh it had been illegal for a long time as well, as yourself admit, continues to be part of society despite unsuccessful efforts to criminalize it's use.

If you were to use the prison/police angle what would it consist of? The fact that the prisons are full of non-violent drug users and police could use time spent pursuing and arresting these who for the greater percentage are otherwise upstanding, tax paying citizens who were contributing to society in a positive way.

It doesn't take long to Internet search all the stories of individual's and their families lives who have been wrongly incarcerated and for ever scarred due to current legislation. 

The total social cost to society for criminalizing the marijuana plant and it's use well beyond what legalization would bring. In fact, going from spending tax money to enforce the law to taxing the market to support society for a benefit to society obviously adds value as well.





View Post | View Thread
cd329 59
View Post | View Thread
replied to Bye Bye legal recreational marijuana
in Politics
Quote Originally Posted by wallstreetcappers:

I do not agree with recreational use, I think the risks outweigh the rewards to society...same goes for alkie and cigs (so I am cutting you pro-pot guys off at the pass)...

So I am fine if they kick it out, those guys who want it so badly and need it will keep using, just like they did before. 


So you would like prohibition of alcohol and tobacco along with marijuana?

As you wrote, "those guys that want it so badly and need it will keep using, just like they did before", why not make it legal so these citizens who are not a harm to otherss do not "need" to interact with "illegal dealers" who are willing to become "criminals" to make a profit on marijuana?

Would make more sense and cents to tax it legally to benefit society financially to fund schools, transportation, small business, etc., while allowing law enforcement and the judicial system (and tax payer $) to focus on crimes of violent nature against other citizens.(All comes against others).

Protect and Serve is a far cry from seek and destroy.

The war on drugs and marijuana in particular is not working as you stated above. If someone wants to use, they will find a way to use the risk to society enters when then user has to interact illegally with someone who is willing to risk selling illegally. 




View Post | View Thread
cd329 59
View Post | View Thread
replied to NO vs. Indiana
in NBA Betting
Quote Originally Posted by rod_steel:

Pelicans +4.5 

to the cover but a bit bitter about ML and 2nd half ML. 
View Post | View Thread
C-NART 17
View Post | View Thread
replied to NO vs. Indiana
in NBA Betting
Quote Originally Posted by NONEED4LUCK:

Why is Davis out of the game? 

Hard foul by Turner. Davis shot his free throws and left game with hip and wrist injuries. Was the difference in the outcome no doubt.
View Post | View Thread
C-NART 17
View Post | View Thread
replied to NO vs. Indiana
in NBA Betting
AD plays whole game and Pelicans get this one. 

Might still cover despite AD.
View Post | View Thread
C-NART 17
View Post | View Thread
replied to NO vs. Indiana
in NBA Betting
Solomon Hill and Dante Cunningham = 60+ min 2-12 FG 1-7 3PT ouch.
View Post | View Thread
C-NART 17
View Post | View Thread
About Us
Contact Us
Careers
Our Team
Brand
Testimonials
Betting Guides
Sportsbook Reviews
Sports Betting News
Podcasts
Responsible Gaming
Sports Betting
US Betting Sites
Canada Betting Sites
Canada Casinos
Best Betting Apps
Contests
Streak Survivor
King of Covers
Ultimate Race
Office Pools
The Covers community has
618,670
lifetime members worldwide
Covers 25 Years Logo Established in 1995,
Covers is the world
leader in sports
betting information.
Site Map Help Privacy Terms of Service youtube logo facebook logo twitter logo instagram logo linkedin logo google news logo
Covers is verified safe by: Evalon Logo GPWA Logo GDPR Logo GeoTrust Logo Evalon Logo
Copyright © 1995 - 2024 CS Media Limited All Rights Reserved.

If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.