Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
Anyone have any player prop bets that jump out at them in Week 1?
C Newton Throws 25 or More Pass Completions +500 is one I like. Also, does anyone know a online sportsbook that allows parlaying prop bets. It's near impossible to find one.
|
demapples | 1 |
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
demapples | 29 |
|
|||
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by CanadaCup: BOL demapples Hope you and you're family are fine and you get power on soon. Thanks Canada, the power just came back on and what a great feeling after 4 days without. |
demapples | 45 |
|
|||
![]() |
![]() Post Script: To those effected by Hurricane Sandy (like me, we still have no power at our home)...hang it there. Thanks to those helping anyway you can! |
demapples | 45 |
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
demapples | 33 |
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
demapples | 41 |
|
|||
![]() |
"A
pleasant good afternoon to everyone and welcome to Week 6's SUCKER BET
brought to you by the fine folks at Tootsie Pop! For
those of you who are unfamiliar
with the SUCKER BET, each week I identify the games where the public
seems to be heavily favoring one side. Typically there are 3 or 4
choices each week. From those games, I choose one unpopular pick as
the SUCKER BET. Last week was another great week for the SUCKER BET as the Colts beating the Packers was this year's 4th outright win bringing our season tally to 4-1 ATS. This week I'm on another home
dog. The Bengals are favored by 3 in Cleveland this Sunday and many seem to be heavily favoring Cincinnati. Initially, it looks like Joe Public is on the right side as CIN has won
5 of their last 7 against CLE and are slightly better at each offensive
and defensive category. But we need to remember that these are 2 bad
football teams. Cincinnati struggles against divisional opponents
(0-5-2 ATS in their last 7 vs. AFC North). Conversely, the Browns have
recently taken care of the divisional opponent (Browns are 4-0-1 ATS in
their last 5 vs. AFC North). The Bengals are relying on Green-Ellis
this week, but he can't get it going. He's averaging just 3.3 YPC this
season and rushed for only 14 yards last week. Brown's d-back Joe Haden
in returning from suspension just in time to cover AJ Green. If you're hesitant to put a couple shekels on a winless team, I don't blame
you. Just keep in mind that they are as motivated to win their first game as ATL is motivated to not lose their first game. It's not going to be a pretty game, but I think it will be a close one that hopefully lands on the side of the home dog and perhaps another SUCKER BET outright win! There you have it, Browns +3 this week. Good luck to everyone this week and see you next week for WEEK 7's SUCKER BET brought to you by Tootsie Pop!"
|
demapples | 42 |
|
|||
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by choiOi: I thought 9ers/Vikings and Atl/Car were trapped games...I don't think Packers are it this week. Look at the Saints w/out a HC this season.....the sucker should be Skins +3 but you've done well so I would hate to bet against you this week. GL bud. The Redskins weren't an option. I can only chose from the 3 or 4 most lopsided consensus picks. Simply being an underdog doesn't qualify...I like to make it hard on myself. |
demapples | 29 |
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
demapples | 29 |
|
|||
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by kRaZeEpLaYa: Is that really u Demapples? Haven't seen u post in years. Yeah it's me. Damn life (wife, kids, business) got in the way of what's important; Cappin' games and $5 6-team parlays! I'll probably lose the next 3 weeks and you won't hear from me for a while....or I could have another year like the 2 or 3 I had years back. We'll see.... |
demapples | 42 |
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
demapples | 42 |
|
|||
![]() |
"A win is a win" doesn't even apply here. So many wrong doings in the final sequence of this game. Leading up to the final play, the roughing the passer call shouldn't have been called on that low tackle as the QB was out of the pocket. Then Jennings needs to just bat that ball down, the thought of making on catch on that play shouldn't even be in his head. Tough to be proud of the SUCKET BET this week.
|
demapples | 28 |
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
demapples | 28 |
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
demapples | 49 |
|
|||
![]() |
Quote Originally Posted by gcwrestling08: you mean colts, not bears. and you typed it twice Correct Colts + 9.5 Giants -4 Bills +4 ATL/KC Under 41.5 CARDINALS +3 |
demapples | 36 |
|
|||
![]() |
2012 NFL
ATS 0-0 SU: 0-0 O/U: 0-0 It's been a super long time since I've posted on these boards. 3-5 years ago I'd recognize almost everyone, but the usernames I see now don't look so familiar. Nobody's fault but my own. That's what happens when wife, kids, house, business, and so on enter into the picture. Nonetheless I'm sure the content and opinions are as rich as ever! GL to everyone this upcoming 2012 season and let's combine our heads to make some extra spending money this year. I typically don't like betting the NFL in week one, or at least betting the "normal" amount. I try to not let the excitement take over my game plan. If you can find a nice opening day trend, by all means, play it (and post it to this thread!), but it's tough to get a solid handle on things until 2-3 weeks go buy. One practice I always do, without fail, and I'm sure I'm not alone, is print out all the game without looking at the lines. I then try to guess and write down what the lines would be and see where the biggest difference is. This doesn't necessarily determine my plays, but it's a good starting point. On that note, the only game that had a somewhat large differential was the BEARS hosting the Colts. I pegged this at Bears -5.5, but looks like the lines makers are not buying into the Andrew Luck hype like perhaps I am. But that's not why I like the Colts in this game. I like the Colts because they finished relatively strong in 2011 (4-1 ATS) and the Bears couldn't put it together on grass down the stretch (1-4 ATS L5). The under is hitting a combined 13-1 with these 2 teams. Under often translate to underdog. I expect a slow start and a somewhat tight game. CHI 20 IND 16 Bears + 9.5 Other plays include: Giants -4 Giants just have their number especially in New York. Though I tend to like dogs more within a divisional rival. But not here. Bills +4 Now a team that doesn't mind traveling the Big Apple is the Bills (5-1 ATS L6). Road team in (8-1 ATS L9). Have I mentioned that I tend to like dogs within a division rivalry? ATL/KC Under 41.5 Neither teams have a great familiarity with each other. The under trends for KC are too prolific to ignore. The under is 6-2 in the Falcons L8 openers. Joe Public is all over that ATL offense. For Old Times Sake..... SUCKER BET OF THE WEEK CARDINALS +3 (and counting) Can't take ARI? Then let me be in the minority. After all, that's what the SUCKER BET is all about!!!! SEA is 1-5 ATS L6 in Arizona. If you're taking SEA, just don't get carried away. Bears + 9.5 Giants -4 Bills +4 ATL/KC Under 41.5 CARDINALS +3 |
demapples | 36 |
|
|||
![]() |
It's been very long since I've posted on these boards, but I figured I'd document these great games coming up on Sunday.
GB (-3.5) @ CHI (43) Of all the statistics and trends I've read regarding this game, none other seems to have more weight than: In his last 9 starts, Aaron Rodgers has thrown 22 TD passes and just 2 INTs in 269 pass attempts, with a .729 completion percentage and a 125.0 passer rating. Speaking of passer ratings, in his 5 starts vs. the Packers, Jay Cutler has a passer rating on 65.0. Additionally, Packers are 9-3 ATS in their last 12 meetings in Chicago. Therefor it's no surprise that I like the favorite in this match-up. As for the total, I won't side with Joe Public on this one. I'll take the over. In the L5 Packer playoff games, the over has hit 4x. In the L6 Bears playoff games the over has hit 5x. I keep hearing about the weather and the field condition and all that stuff and it only solidifies my feelings more. PREDITCION: GB 27, CHI 17 NYJ @ PIT (-3.5) 38.5 I like the fact that Mark Sanchez has played relatively well in his couple playoff games. I think there is value on the other side as last week's performance was just the 4th time all year that he has had multiple TD with no INTs, his last was week 4. But one of the most powerful statistics has to be; The Steelers haven't allowed a 100 yard rusher in their last 50 regular season games. I can't believe this line isn't closer to 5 or 6. Which makes me feel like I falling into a SUCKER trap. But I can't take the other side, so I'll take the chalk. As for the total, I think this game goes over as well. Pittsburgh's young receivers are going to be able to make a significant impact. I think the Steelers can put 24 points on the board. In Pittsburgh's last 5 Conference Championship games, ALL have gone over. In thier last 11 home playoff games, 10 have gone over. In the Jets last 11 road games, 10 have gone over. PREDICTION: NYJ 17, PIT 24 Good Luck Everyone! |
demapples | 25 |
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
demapples | 34 |
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
demapples | 77 |
|
|||
![]() |
![]() |
demapples | 24 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.