Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo:
Quote Originally Posted by jowchoo: season=2024 and AD and week>16 and 51>total>41.5 and day=Sunday (8-2) Here is an 80% trend to the over with games this weekend in play. These games avg 54 pts scored, so a teaser to the under should have potential 1. KC over 41/ PHIL over 41 -119 (2%) 2. KC over 47.5 (1%) 3. PHIL over 47.5 (1%) Good luck. |
Indigo999 | 78 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by doogie43:
Indigo do you ever look at totals? I like a food total bet lol Yeah, one you can sink your teeth into. |
Indigo999 | 78 |
|
|
For those of you having trouble copying and pasting queries into the Reply field, I suggest trying this: Copy the query, then enter the Reply field. Type a few characters and, without moving your browser, right click and choose "Paste as plain text" and then delete those few added characters. I uses Chrome and that nearly always works for me. Good luck. |
Indigo999 | 78 |
|
|
I was able to post that query from Comment #32 using my preferred SDQL at GTD: PO = 1 and p:PY < 150 and A and -4.2 < line < 4.2 ATS: 15-5-0 (3.1, 75.0%) Good luck everybody.
|
Indigo999 | 78 |
|
|
[Quote: Originally Posted by Indigo999]18) A playoff away dog that passed for less than 150 yards the previous game.....29-17 ATS (+1.9), 19-27 straight up (-2.9).....if instead the line is between -4 and +4 this moves to 15-4 ATS (+3.4), 12-7 straight up (+2.4).......Bills query text.......playoffs=1 and p:passing yards<150 and A and -4 Great query. I strongly favor BUF and appreciate the extra support. |
Indigo999 | 78 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Indigo999:
15) Teams off playing the Lions the last two seasons have gone 11-22-1 ATS (-4.5) 14-20 straight up (-2.8). Away dogs after playing the Lions the past two years.....1-5-1 ATS (-6.4), 1-6 straight up (-11.4) 16) Home favorites after playing the Rams the past two seasons 9-2 ATS (+5.2), 10-1 straight up (+12.6) Dan Campbell became the DET coach in the 2021 season. season > 2020 and po:team = Lions and p:WAD (SU 3-2) (ATS 2-3). No decisive edge there. season > 2020 and po:team = Lions and p:WAD and AD (SU and ATS 0-1). One result is meaningless, so I don't think WAS is hopeless. season > 2020 and po:team = Lions and p:WAD and p:margin > 6.5 (SU and ATS 1-0). One result is meaningless, so I don't think WAS is a lock. WAD teams probably did not get physically manhandled. Of course 5 takeaways may have made WAS look stronger than they really were; DET outgained WAS by 40 total yards. I haven't found anything yet worth acting on. The way this season has been going that's probably a good thing. |
Indigo999 | 78 |
|
|
Good luck. |
vanzack | 102 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Boisestateand8:
Quote Originally Posted by DogbiteWilliams: Quote Originally Posted by Boisestateand8: @theclaw Not trying to be contrary, but dome teams or warm weather teams don't do well in cold temps. Supposed to be around 25° in KC Saturday. That's a HUGE advantage for the Chiefs. Not supposed to be quite that cold in Philly, but again, the Rams aren't used to it. With you on the Eagles, not so sure about the Texans. HOU is 3-1 SU and ATS as a road dog when the temperature is under 28F degrees. Small sample size. The loss was a year ago in Baltimore. True. I would never place any wagers based on query results of just 4 games, but it does show that dome teams are not doomed in frigid conditions. |
theclaw | 152 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Boisestateand8:
@theclaw Not trying to be contrary, but dome teams or warm weather teams don't do well in cold temps. Supposed to be around 25° in KC Saturday. That's a HUGE advantage for the Chiefs. Not supposed to be quite that cold in Philly, but again, the Rams aren't used to it. With you on the Eagles, not so sure about the Texans. HOU is 3-1 SU and ATS as a road dog when the temperature is under 28F degrees.
|
theclaw | 152 |
|
|
I think that sounded better in the original Martian. |
tjones1270 | 24 |
|
|
I've got HOU and LAR, but good luck to you and your many tailers. You are having a MUCH better season than I am. |
theclaw | 152 |
|
|
Good luck tonight. |
theclaw | 152 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by vanzack:
Adjusting my Vikings line to -2.5, same bet on Minny -2.5 for 2 units. I just happened to be at Circa the past several days, and they are the only book I know of that honored any wagers before the venue change announcement. So I actually lucked out and have the Vikings -1, but for our purposes here my posted # is -2.5.. Haters, suck it. I salute your personal integrity in this forum. Good luck to you and your many tailers even though I have the LAR tonight. |
vanzack | 110 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by grobari-pz:
3 of his ints bounced off receivers hands or chest. Dissley dropped a long pass early on and had one bounce off his chest to a Texan. Crazy. I like the guy, his receivers let him down bigtime. That was certainly informative. Thanks. The LAC went from 5 regular-season wins to 11 in Harbaugh's first season. While they might continue to improve, they will be saddled with a much-tougher schedule next season. |
DogbiteWilliams | 14 |
|
|
From ESPN: "Herbert threw a league-low three interceptions during the regular season but had four against the Texans, making him the first player in NFL history to throw more picks in a playoff game than in the regular season (minimum 200 attempts)." https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/43378121/herbert-4-ints-critical-play-chargers-season-ends I did not watch that game, so I have no idea if he stunk, the receivers played as if drunk on junk, or HOU's DEF made Herbert look like a punk. |
DogbiteWilliams | 14 |
|
|
@theclaw
Yes, "W" = SU win and "ATSW" = against the spread win. BAL won SU but did not cover, so that query was a mixed bag. The other query that said to fade PIT ATS did work.
|
theclaw | 152 |
|
|
@theclaw
From Comment #52 - We can make a case the hottest is also Ravens, off 4 wins and 4 ATS wins You have a good point, TC. This query for PlayOff Home Favorites is fairly easy to compose or understand: PO = 1 and HF and p:W and pp:W and ppp:W and pppp:W and p:ATSW and pp:ATSW and ppp:ATSW and pppp:ATSW (Lower case "p" stands for "previous".) SU: 14-7-1 (2.6,66.7%) ATS: 7-15 (-4.5,31.8%) I did not take PIT because I have another query that says fade PIT (it is 2-9 ATS) based on the difference in team wins and # of weak DEF efforts the last five games. |
theclaw | 152 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:
Total yards margin 2cd half of season improvement or decline................................... Most SB Winners peak in total yards margin in the 2cd half of the season. KC did both of past 2 years. Keep in mind, a team only needs to improve, the amount does not matter as far as winning the SB. A half yard is good to go. Improved teams ................ Bucs +55.3............. largest improvement Lions +54.6. .. with injured defensive players Bills +10.7 Ravens +9.8 Vikings +7.13 Rams +4.9 ......... but outgained in 2cd half by 27 per game Eagles +3.3 SB Winner likely comes from this list.......... Team declined 2cd half of season .................. Packers -10.1 LAC -11.23 Broncos -17.15 Wash -17.8 Steelers -25.2 KC -27.7 .........yikkers and bringing up the rear. ...... Texans -69.9 .........wowser Great research. Thanks for the time and effort. |
theclaw | 152 |
|
|
Good luck. |
jowchoo | 13 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by kcblitzkrieg:
@DogbiteWilliams Be careful if it is the Chargers they face.... 4th straight road game in playoffs (Division or Conference Title game) after winning 3 roadies in a row is recipe for disaster
Excellent point. For the fourth straight road (Away) playoff games the query is very simple: PO = 1 and A and p:A and pp:A and ppp:A SU: 0-7 (-10.1, 0.0%) ATS: 1-5-1 (-5.9, 16.7%) This includes all fourth straight road games regardless of wins and losses. Off 3 straight road wins road playoff teams are 0-4 SU and 1-3 ATS. |
theclaw | 152 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.