Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
@tjones1270 Thanks for pointing that out. It is about as close to the Bator Rule as can be while falling 1 pt short. Call it a 3/4 Bator Rule to be most accurate but it's up to each bettor to decide if it's going to be a factor in their choice for the game. But it is worthy of mention, not just fitting "a narrative" |
tjones1270 | 4 |
|
|
There is a positive statistic for taking a team that scores less than 10 pts in each of the last 2 games but I cant find it for tonight. The Giants scored 7 and 3 the past two weeks.
Similarly, going against a team that scores 30+ two weeks in arow and PITT has scored 32 and 37 past two weeks. Anyone have the records on either of these two angles?? |
vanzack | 114 |
|
|
|
Erik48 | 8 |
|
|
@Yanasaur
@yeghia
|
Erik48 | 8 |
|
|
@TJZags598
@NorCalKid27
Thank you for taking time to comment - Much appreciated! |
Erik48 | 8 |
|
|
I'm a commissioner in a CBS Fantasy League. Lineups LOCK 5 minutes before each players' game. As a commissioner: If a player gets Locked out from making a lineup change, do you allow him to text/call you so you can use your commissioner powers to make the change as long as the game hasn't started? As a player: do you expect your commish to do this for you if you get locked out?
I think missing the deadline is your own fault and the commissh should not step in. Why is it called a deadline if it isn't? It also opens the door to miscommunications with the opponent, or what if the commish is not even reachable before the game starts? If a player was incapacitated and asked me in advance to swap out a player that was announced active/inactive for example, I'd be ok with it. But the move would be done before any deadlines were violated. I'm being called the bad guy in this situation and don't think I deserve it. Interested to hear what others think. Thanks!
|
Erik48 | 8 |
|
|
I’m a commissioner in a 12- team CBS fantasy football league. Our rules state that Any changes made to your lineup will lock five minutes prior to the start of that players game. |
Erik48 | 1 |
|
|
NO +3 JAX -5.5 DET +1.5 SEA +3 BUF -9.5 SF -1 BAL -3.5 WAS -8 mnf 41 |
tammy296 | 61 |
|
|
@theclaw
Do the Bucs fall into a partial or 3/4 Bator Rule? (Scoring 30+ and allowing less than 10 in two consecutive games) It's not complete but I believe you've given consideration to a partial Bator Rule in the past. Last 2 games: TB 32 PHI 9 TB 9 CAR 0 |
theclaw | 151 |
|
|
Thanks again Joe! |
syracusejoe | 37 |
|
|
@syracusejoe Thanks again for the winner Joe!
Erik (SU alum 1982) |
syracusejoe | 13 |
|
|
Thanks for the winner Joe! |
syracusejoe | 42 |
|
|
I like TEN when getting points and ATL as a road favorite for first time since last year is a stretch. Tennessee for mee. |
Digitalkarma | 30 |
|
|
The Bills just lost 2 of their last 3 games to JAX and N.E... And were one play away from losing to the NYG. They've had 2 weeks to bounce back with a big game after losing to JAX and haven't done so yet. To expect them to turn it around in a short week is asking alot imo. Bucs come in well-rested with few road games so far, but have defeated both MIN and SAINTS on the road already. They play Under games that keep them IN GAMES. TB is 4th in blitz rate and we know what happened to Josh Allen against the Patriots blitz last week (On non-blitz plays, Allen was 17-22 163 yards 7.4 y/a; When blitzing, Allen was only 10-19 102 yards 5.4 y/a). Bucs will be blitzing! Lastly, the BIlls may also be looking ahead to their next game vs the Bengals. They'll have a more reasonable 10 days to get their act together for that one. TB + 8.5 |
professor53 | 15 |
|
|
@haymo https://www.footballzebras.com/2023/10/week-8-referee-assignments-2023/
|
begginerboy | 48 |
|
|
@begginerboy In support of your Giants play, the referee for the game is John Hussey- he's the #1 ref for Home teams. Home teams are 65-46 ats when Hussey is the official and, even better, the home team in division games is 34-13! I'm a Commanders fan and my pools this week say Giants.
There are two angles to this game. The ‘Let ‘Em Play” component is immense. It has the makings of a grind it out contest, something along the lines of a 19-17 type game. So it goes without saying the under is worth serious consideration. The home team angle with Hussey in these games is astounding. If the Giants are to have a chance, it will be on the back of their defense. The less penalties the better here. |
begginerboy | 48 |
|
|
Every single one of SF’s opponents in 2022 lost its next game, if they’ve played the following week. 0-15. (The only footnote is that after the Chiefs defeated the 49ers in Week 7, Kansas City had a bye week in Week 8 before beating the Titans in Week 9.) In 2023, the record is 1-3. In week 2, Pittsburgh WON defeating Cleveland 26-22 after playing the 49ers. (Pitt was actually losing the game before a late TJ Watt fumble return for a TD.)
The next 3 opponents, Rams, NYG and AZ all lost the following week. So record is now 1-18 and DALLAS is the next scheduled loser. |
eddiegray | 8 |
|
|
Goedert Over 4.5 receptions |
Mayor | 12 |
|
|
replied to
NFL PLAYOFFS .............................................................................2022 season
in NFL Betting @theclaw Thanks and agree. Always look forward to your analyses and thanks again for helping me make the move to KC on gameday. I was on Cincy all week
|
theclaw | 258 |
|
|
replied to
NFL PLAYOFFS .............................................................................2022 season
in NFL Betting @soup-can Thanks for the input. I think the Bator Rule has already been proven to be a successful system during regular season. I suppose one could find the games in which a bye week interrupted the schedule between the second and third game (similar to the bye week before the SB), but as you say, it was difficult to find such a situation and I'm sure it is not a significant sample size. And frankly the playoff examples do not represent a good sample size either. However, I think there is a difference in the Bator Rule "regular season vs playoffs". During regular season, any team that achieves 30+ pts on offense while holding opponents to 10 pts or less on defense for two consecutive games, will create overconfidence by either the offense/defense or both in the 3rd game. Additioinally, linesmakers will need to inflate the lines as most bettors will use 'recency bias', expecting the trend to continue (which it usually does not). Move onto the playoff scenario ... a second season of 3 (or4) games leading to the ultimate SB win. Each game comes with greater motivation and knowledge that more effort will be needed at each level. Any emotional regression far less likely than regular season imo. And more likely to see a continuance of superior play - and that is how 3 of the last 4 similar situations played out.
|
theclaw | 258 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.