Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Penn State ($115) -17
Northwestern -12.5
Texas -18
Washington -12
Boston College -12.5
Nebraska ($105) -12.5
Florida -21.5
4-1 today so far...adding the later games now:
Texas Tech ($115) -16.5
Missouri ($105) -13
Boise State ($115) -21
Alabama ($105) -20.5
South Florida ($115) -13.5
|
GamblinIsMyLife | 2 |
|
|
Last year this system produced 32+ units, the year before 15+ units, and 9+ units before that.
Blind betting any team in the first half that is favored by 20+ points for the game. It was 7-2 last week (didn't post but you can check the scoreboard). Be cautious, as week 2 is the LEAST profitable week for this system.
Lots of games today for this sytem:
Penn State ($115) -17
Northwestern -12.5
Texas -18
Washington -12
Boston College -12.5
Nebraska ($105) -12.5
Florida -21.5
All games are risking $110 to win $100 unless noted.
Good luck !!!
|
GamblinIsMyLife | 2 |
|
|
Yep, it was a bad call. But it was not the sole reason they lost the game.
|
Boom_Boom | 17 |
|
|
hahaha unreal
|
MEaazy | 353 |
|
|
Can't really play the over/under...could go either way, in my opinion.
But best of luck to you!
|
GamblinIsMyLife | 9 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Zoot:
Ok although I do like GT tonight, this doesnt make sense. LSU spanked GT in the peach bowl last year 38-3 pretty much stopping their rushing attack. I think he was being sarcastic (for his sake I hope). |
MiGhT_Be_All_In | 26 |
|
|
Let's not forget one other important factor:
CJ Spiller was not in the game last year - correct
But who was virtually non-existent in the game last year? Roddy Jones.
He only had 2 carries and 1 reception. Coach Johnson continued to use him more and more into the offense (anyone remember Jones' 200+ yards against a decent UGA team?) as the season progressed.
Oh, and who had more rushing yards last season, Spiller or Jones? Jones -- even with 30 less carriies!
I have seen Jones play, and let me tell you, he could end up being even better than Dwyer.
Georgia Tech. Bet them.
|
GamblinIsMyLife | 9 |
|
|
I am reading about a lot of people taking Clemson and some are bringing up the point that Tech looked sloppy last week.
But let's look into that.
How many players had at least 1 rushing attempt for Tech? 13.
Who had the most rushing attempts? Nesbitt (QB) 14. Second most? Dwyer 7.
Is it hard to get into a rhythm with that many players getting touches? Yes.
This kind of reminds me of last season's opener when Georgia Tech won 41-14 against this same Jacksonville State team. 9 players had a rushing attempt, and it was a sloppy effort by Tech. They had five fumbles (two lost).
But how did they respond? By beating a solid Boston College team on the road. Nesbitt and Dwyer combined for 33 rushes and 158 yards in that game. They only had 3 others with rushing attempts (Jones with 3, 2 others with 1). I expect to see a whole lot of Nesbitt, Dwyer, and Jones.
Obviously, I will be backing Georgia Tech (-5.5).
|
GamblinIsMyLife | 9 |
|
|
MrHeadache, I am always intrigued by your write-ups and your picks, however, I respectfully disagree with your decision.
I don't think you can put any barring on last week's matchup. Granted, Georgia Tech didn't have a killer instinct. However, they were up 31-7 at half time. Jonathan Dwyer did not play in the entire second half. Roddy Jones was out for the entire game. Tech would have won by 30-40 points if both of these played and played the entire game.
As far as last year's game, right, CJ Spiller was out. But let's not forget about Roddy Jones. He was non-existent (only had 2 carries, 1 catch) and if I remember correctly, was partially injured. This might be surprising, but Jones rushed for more yards than Spiller last year on far less carries.
And let's not forget perhaps the biggest mismatch for the game tonight. Paul Johnson vs Dabo Swinney. One of the best coaches in the ACC vs perhaps the worst coach in the ACC.
Anyways, best of luck to you.
|
MrHeadache | 83 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by mcwarner1:
just out of curiosity how does your system work, i like almost all the games and am on many myself, just wonderin though
It's a complicated system. I'd rather not go into the details because it's almost impossible to explain fully. It involves a personal ranking system (by me) and it goes off of that into other intangibles (line, home/away, injuries, etc.) The first week or two is always the hardest, until it gets into conference play. But once conference play starts, the profit will (hopefully) start rolling in. |
GamblinIsMyLife | 11 |
|
|
Thanks mrmo and Mr_Hollywood
to you as well!
|
GamblinIsMyLife | 11 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by masterkush:
Would be careful of the 90-95% i have not done the numbers so wont speak out of my ars.... But BOL
Well, 90-95% might be a little off, but in the first couple of weeks (most non-conference games), the system will produce nearly all favorites. When conference games start, there will be more underdogs! |
GamblinIsMyLife | 11 |
|
|
to you D-Town, kittsd, nc1capper
|
GamblinIsMyLife | 11 |
|
|
Hello.
First post.
Always have looked at this forum to get some insight, predictions, laughs, etc.
I have used this system for the past couple of seasons and it has done extremely well...I use it for CFB and the NFL. It's riskier in CFB because of the amount of games that I have to play, but hell, if it wins money, then there is no problem...My goal, as always, is to win over 100+ units in college football! Good luck goes out to me and everyone else with their selections...
Each play listed below is risking $110 to win $100 (Starting low in week 2, then will go higher):
Virginia Tech -19
Georgia Tech -5.5 Texas - 33.5 North Carolina -4.5 Oklahoma State -14.5 Texas Tech -28 Nebraska -23.5 Washington U -20.5 Utah -13.5 Ohio -3 Memphis PK Alabama -34
LSU -14.5
Auburn -14
Yes, all favorites...and about 90-95% of my plays are going to be favorites.
|
GamblinIsMyLife | 11 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.