Profile | Entries | Thread Author | Posts | Activity |
---|---|---|---|---|
Achilles, all you do is make shit up and see what sticks, what happened to accusing me of making up fake betting slips when all I did was take screen shots from my account on my phone which clearly showed 4 digit parlay winners. You have yet to backup a single bet you make which is why I will continue to call you out making $5 bets, because until I see otherwise you ride the coattails of other posters on this site, try to take credit for the fake internet points that come along with it by posting your picks 5 minutes after the game started. How much of an overlay of bets for the first 10 weeks of the season will I see if I dig up your post history between you and LC? Do you even know what plagiarism is? If the search function wasn't a joke at covers I would spend the 5 minutes it should take to do the straight up comparison, because unlike you, I don't care to waste hours on end cherry picking posts to discredit you. Unlike you, I don't need to cry by spending an hour making these pathetic posts, I can bang them out in 5 minutes, I feel sorry for you, you are mentally deranged and should seek help from a professional. |
Goat_12 | 33 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:
Quote Originally Posted by Goat_12: What you put in a title is only part of the story, you are not considering alot of other info like for example Pats are 0-3 ATS as a favortite of a TD or more and 3-2 ATS when under a TD and 3-1 ATS when 3 point favorite or less which is what the line is this year. Every team covers the line less often when they are a larger favorites as there is more room to win but not cover, sports betting 101 right there.Why would the Pats be any different ? Your only pointing out the Pats are not any different.Your posting only what you want the info to say and leaving out any other conclusion can be reached with the info, I am just pointing that out.Yes when pats are 3 point favorites or less they are 3-1 ATS. The pats other ATS losses came with a bigger favorite then 4 points.okIf pats win they are 3-0 ATS with a line 3 favorite or less. The title of this thread has nothing to do with when the Patriots are under dogs so why even bother interjecting your retarded ideas? A team is either a favorite, an underdog, or even. I started a thread pointing out that the Patriots have only covered once in the Super Bowl as favorites. Which is TRUE. Some people took offense since they bet on the Patriots and skewed the comparison to include favorites of 3 points, even and underdogs, how is that my fault? The spread is not PK, the spread is not as an underdog, the spread is -2.5 or -3 depending on where you look. |
Goat_12 | 33 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by HappyKane:
$140 per seat for Super Bowl viewing party. SMH. That is chump change for a LV SB party. |
HappyKane | 20 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by tahoejoe2:
Should Rams even be in SB? This argument is the equivalent to everyone saying "Who have the Patriots beat this season?", as they enter the Super Bowl vs. the Falcons. |
Htowngoat | 94 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:
Goff's 78.7 is very ikerly one of the worst performances of any QB TO TAKE HIS TEAM TO THE SB SINCE 1978 WHEN LEAGUE WENT TO 16 GAME SCHEDULE AND CHANGE THE RULES TO OPEN UP THE PASSING GAME.GOFF WAS OUT-PLAYED BY BOTH QB'S HE FACED IN PLAYOFFS WITHOUT Kupp
Goff finished the season with a higher rating than Brady 101.1 vs. 97.7, last time Brady had a QB Rating that low was 2014, you high? |
don juan | 51 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw:
Since Kupp was lost for the season with the Rams Goffs passing numbers went down . 1 ppg difference? That is your big counter argument? I think you are blinded by the 8 super bowls The Pats gave up 2 additional 2 TD across 2 playoff games. |
don juan | 51 |
|
|
click a mouse win your wife |
Humblepie | 18 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by gutinstinctus:
Quote Originally Posted by Goat_12: I got this dont worry... GOAT, could you please tell me the rivals that the Rams faced with Talib and the rivals that they faced without Talib? Could you also please let me know how many points did the 49ers score against the Rams without Talib, and how many did they score with Talib? May your Talib argument rest in peace. This ain´t 2015. YOU´RE WELCOME! Quote Originally Posted by NinjaNight: IDGAF his argument is flawed. Quote Originally Posted by Goat_12: Wow sorry bud but this isn't the place for that kinda crap. Debate this stuff in appropriate areas. You're talking to a Covers legend who is 14-3 in Superbowls and he's sharing his play not looking for arguments.Goff 32 TD, 12 INT, 4688 yards, 101.1 rating Brady 29 TD, 11 INT, 4355 yards, 97.7 rating (lowest since 2014) Rams have given up 138 points in the 8 games Aqib Talib was healthy and played, extrapolate to a 16-game season yields 276 points, for best in the NFL Points Allowed / Game, all the while having the 5th hardest schedule compared to the Patriots 22nd. Perhaps you should pay attention a little more to statistics.
The number of times opp scored 27 or more points when Talib was playing = 2 games (25%) The number of times opp scored 27 or more points when Talib was NOT playing = 6 games (75%)
w/ Talib @ CHI 15 | NEP @ CHI 31 -- 16 Point differential @ DET 16 | NEP @ DET 26 -- 10 Point differential
49ers w/ Talib was week 17 |
don juan | 51 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by NinjaNight: IDGAF his argument is flawed.
Quote Originally Posted by Goat_12: Wow sorry bud but this isn't the place for that kinda crap. Debate this stuff in appropriate areas. You're talking to a Covers legend who is 14-3 in Superbowls and he's sharing his play not looking for arguments.Goff 32 TD, 12 INT, 4688 yards, 101.1 rating Brady 29 TD, 11 INT, 4355 yards, 97.7 rating (lowest since 2014) Rams have given up 138 points in the 8 games Aqib Talib was healthy and played, extrapolate to a 16-game season yields 276 points, for best in the NFL Points Allowed / Game, all the while having the 5th hardest schedule compared to the Patriots 22nd. Perhaps you should pay attention a little more to statistics. |
don juan | 51 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by don juan:
As you know, I’m not a big fan of statistics. the question is .. Can Goff win this game on the final drive, in a close game? I doubt it. The Rams certainly have great individual players on defense, but I just don’t trust them. Goff 32 TD, 12 INT, 4688 yards, 101.1 rating Brady 29 TD, 11 INT, 4355 yards, 97.7 rating (lowest since 2014) Rams have given up 138 points in the 8 games Aqib Talib was healthy and played, extrapolate to a 16-game season yields 276 points, for best in the NFL Points Allowed / Game, all the while having the 5th hardest schedule compared to the Patriots 22nd. Perhaps you should pay attention a little more to statistics. |
don juan | 51 |
|
|
So you are still denying plagiarizing picks? Carolina ML remember that pick you copied off of LC? How about when you bet against your Bears and lost that one too, just a coincidence that LC had the same exact bets (it was more than one, first half I believe too), I'd look it up, but I really don't care about you any more, it has already been proven exhaustively how much of a joke you are. |
Goat_12 | 33 |
|
|
Triggered, better watch your blood pressure boy. Keep thinking I "print fake tickets" talk about grasping at straws, LMFAO. |
Goat_12 | 33 |
|
|
The only clown in this thread is Achilles who cannot man up for plagiarizing picks. Once I pointed it out, your win rate went in the toilet < 46%, add in the vig for normal lines -110, and the vig for buying points and the vig for picking high leverage money lines and you came across as a complete joke and the entire community here knows it. Maybe next time you track units and ROI like a professional instead of some rookie making $5 bets to keep your wife happy. Keep embarrassing yourself by attacking me, I find it HIGHLY amusing. |
Goat_12 | 33 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by supermanbets:
Quote Originally Posted by Achilles1629: agreed.. such an irrelevant post .. who cares that they didn’t cover -6, -7, -7, -13 most irrelevant thing ever the spread everyone has is New England -1 to -2.5 ... they need to win by a fg.. they don’t need to cover a td.. a New England Super Bowl is typically 3 or 4 point wins for the side close hard fought games whoever executed and makes the game changing play wins..This thread is If you had half a brain you would realize when Rams lose they do not lose by < 2.5 points, so anyone backing the Patriots should not have to resort to paying the high premium on the Money Line unless they are notoriously bad cappers like Achilles who has shown he is a losing gambler when not plagiarizing picks off of League Capper's weekly threads. |
Goat_12 | 33 |
|
|
Butler sucks, he lacked disciplined and deserved to be bench, he is not the reason the Patriots lost last year. |
begginerboy | 39 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Achilles1629:
Quote Originally Posted by Goat_12: So sad you continue to scrounge. Tell me....are you the type when shaking someone’s hand, you look down? You fail to make eye contact? Let’s try this: Where’s your spreadsheet? How bout the units you are down? Mr. Transparency...remember? That was short lived huh? Have you even reached double digit wins this year? It’s a serious question. At 48 years, with a room mate, how much does your tout service pay you? Is it salary or commission? When you post your fake tickets, do you feel guilty? Whatever it takes to pay your share of the bunk bed huh? It is sooooooo sad that you TRY so hard to make believe on here. I’ve never said this but I feel it’s necessary: I truly feel sorry for you. I mean that. In my time in this site, I don’t think I’ve ever come across such a fake, lost soul who tries so hard to be relevant. You will never take ownership nor will you come clean about what you are all about but hey, some things just don’t register for some. That’s ok. You fill the quota. I should ask coverscap to put out a thread of LEAST SUCCESSFUL on this site. They’ve already put out the top 5 in each category.....have you checked that out? Feel free to pudding pants. CheersSays the guy that can't even break even after getting outted for stealing LC's picks every week of the season. I stopped reading at "fake tickets", it really kills you that I am more successful at this then you are after all that work you put in plagiarizing other people's picks to take credit. I bet your wife doesn't even let you have a gambling account since your meager paycheck has to go towards paying for junior's education and you only do it for the fake internet points.
|
Goat_12 | 33 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by pdouble:
Quote Originally Posted by Goat_12: last year you lost you behind on the pats ... now when you could actually get paid , youre going with the rams ..., that’s why clowns like you only come out a couple weeks a year Quote Originally Posted by Achilles1629: Says the guy that can't even break even after getting outted for stealing LC's picks every week of the season.This thread is "only come out a couple weeks a year " I am guessing you have been asleep the entire season. |
Goat_12 | 33 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by theclaw: The title of this thread has nothing to do with when the Patriots are under dogs so why even bother interjecting your retarded ideas?
Quote Originally Posted by Goat_12: Yes when pats are 3 point favorites or less they are 3-1 ATS. The pats other ATS losses came with a bigger favorite then 4 points.okIf pats win they are 3-0 ATS with a line 3 favorite or less.NO. These are the 8 Super Bowls, they only covered once when favorites. 2001 LAR -14 Cover 20-17 2003 NEP -7 No Cover 32-29 2004 NEP -7 No Cover 24-21 2007 NEP -12.5 No Cover 14-17 2011 NEP -3 No Cover 17-21 2014 PK Cover 28-24 2016 NEP -3 Cover 34-28 2017 NEP -4.5 No Cover 33-41 |
Goat_12 | 33 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Achilles1629:
This thread is Says the guy that can't even break even after getting outted for stealing LC's picks every week of the season. |
Goat_12 | 33 |
|
|
Quote Originally Posted by Achilles1629:
“If you are betting ML, you are betting scared”.... Glad you chimed in, yes that quote was directed at your incompetence. Glad you solved that riddle, not responding to the rest of your wall as trash, because as usual it is worthless. |
Goat_12 | 33 |
|
If you choose to make use of any information on this website including online sports betting services from any websites that may be featured on this website, we strongly recommend that you carefully check your local laws before doing so.It is your sole responsibility to understand your local laws and observe them strictly.Covers does not provide any advice or guidance as to the legality of online sports betting or other online gambling activities within your jurisdiction and you are responsible for complying with laws that are applicable to you in your relevant locality.Covers disclaims all liability associated with your use of this website and use of any information contained on it.As a condition of using this website, you agree to hold the owner of this website harmless from any claims arising from your use of any services on any third party website that may be featured by Covers.